• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

记忆如何能持续数天、数年甚至一生?维持突触增强和记忆的提出机制。

How can memories last for days, years, or a lifetime? Proposed mechanisms for maintaining synaptic potentiation and memory.

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, W. M. Keck Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, McGovern Medical School of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Learn Mem. 2019 Apr 16;26(5):133-150. doi: 10.1101/lm.049395.119. Print 2019 May.

DOI:10.1101/lm.049395.119
PMID:30992383
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6478248/
Abstract

With memory encoding reliant on persistent changes in the properties of synapses, a key question is how can memories be maintained from days to months or a lifetime given molecular turnover? It is likely that positive feedback loops are necessary to persistently maintain the strength of synapses that participate in encoding. Such feedback may occur within signal-transduction cascades and/or the regulation of translation, and it may occur within specific subcellular compartments or within neuronal networks. Not surprisingly, numerous positive feedback loops have been proposed. Some posited loops operate at the level of biochemical signal-transduction cascades, such as persistent activation of Ca/calmodulin kinase II (CaMKII) or protein kinase Mζ. Another level consists of feedback loops involving transcriptional, epigenetic and translational pathways, and autocrine actions of growth factors such as BDNF. Finally, at the neuronal network level, recurrent reactivation of cell assemblies encoding memories is likely to be essential for late maintenance of memory. These levels are not isolated, but linked by shared components of feedback loops. Here, we review characteristics of some commonly discussed feedback loops proposed to underlie the maintenance of memory and long-term synaptic plasticity, assess evidence for and against their necessity, and suggest experiments that could further delineate the dynamics of these feedback loops. We also discuss crosstalk between proposed loops, and ways in which such interaction can facilitate the rapidity and robustness of memory formation and storage.

摘要

由于记忆的编码依赖于突触性质的持续变化,因此一个关键问题是,在分子周转率的情况下,如何将记忆从几天到几个月甚至一生都保持下来?很可能需要正反馈环来持续维持参与编码的突触的强度。这种反馈可能发生在信号转导级联和/或翻译调节内,也可能发生在特定的亚细胞隔室或神经元网络内。毫不奇怪,已经提出了许多正反馈环。一些假定的环在生化信号转导级联的水平上起作用,例如 Ca/calmodulin 激酶 II(CaMKII)或蛋白激酶 Mζ的持续激活。另一个层次包括涉及转录、表观遗传和翻译途径的反馈环,以及 BDNF 等生长因子的自分泌作用。最后,在神经元网络水平上,记忆编码细胞组件的反复再激活对于记忆的后期维持可能是必不可少的。这些水平不是孤立的,而是通过反馈环的共享组件连接起来的。在这里,我们回顾了一些常见的反馈环的特征,这些反馈环被认为是记忆和长时程突触可塑性维持的基础,评估了它们存在的证据以及它们存在的必要性,并提出了一些可能进一步阐明这些反馈环动态的实验。我们还讨论了提议的循环之间的串扰,以及这种相互作用如何促进记忆形成和存储的快速性和稳健性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a477/6478248/886e2e5992cc/LM049395Smo_F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a477/6478248/138f0bcf8741/LM049395Smo_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a477/6478248/dc1af48812ae/LM049395Smo_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a477/6478248/443f9ea1c4cf/LM049395Smo_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a477/6478248/89b5562068e8/LM049395Smo_F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a477/6478248/886e2e5992cc/LM049395Smo_F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a477/6478248/138f0bcf8741/LM049395Smo_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a477/6478248/dc1af48812ae/LM049395Smo_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a477/6478248/443f9ea1c4cf/LM049395Smo_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a477/6478248/89b5562068e8/LM049395Smo_F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a477/6478248/886e2e5992cc/LM049395Smo_F5.jpg

相似文献

1
How can memories last for days, years, or a lifetime? Proposed mechanisms for maintaining synaptic potentiation and memory.记忆如何能持续数天、数年甚至一生?维持突触增强和记忆的提出机制。
Learn Mem. 2019 Apr 16;26(5):133-150. doi: 10.1101/lm.049395.119. Print 2019 May.
2
Comparing Theories for the Maintenance of Late LTP and Long-Term Memory: Computational Analysis of the Roles of Kinase Feedback Pathways and Synaptic Reactivation.比较晚期长时程增强和长期记忆维持的理论:激酶反馈通路和突触再激活作用的计算分析
Front Comput Neurosci. 2020 Dec 16;14:569349. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2020.569349. eCollection 2020.
3
Atypical PKCs in memory maintenance: the roles of feedback and redundancy.记忆维持中的非典型蛋白激酶C:反馈和冗余的作用。
Learn Mem. 2015 Jun 15;22(7):344-53. doi: 10.1101/lm.038844.115. Print 2015 Jul.
4
Modeling maintenance of long-term potentiation in clustered synapses: long-term memory without bistability.模拟簇状突触中长时程增强的维持:无双稳态的长期记忆。
Neural Plast. 2015;2015:185410. doi: 10.1155/2015/185410. Epub 2015 Apr 5.
5
Bistable MAP kinase activity: a plausible mechanism contributing to maintenance of late long-term potentiation.双稳态丝裂原活化蛋白激酶活性:一种有助于维持晚期长时程增强的合理机制。
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008 Feb;294(2):C503-15. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00447.2007. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
6
Making synapses strong: metaplasticity prolongs associativity of long-term memory by switching synaptic tag mechanisms.增强突触连接:通过转换突触标签机制,形改变性延长长时记忆的关联性。
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Feb;24(2):353-63. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs315. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
7
Self-organized reactivation maintains and reinforces memories despite synaptic turnover.自组织再激活可维持和增强记忆,尽管存在突触更替。
Elife. 2019 May 10;8:e43717. doi: 10.7554/eLife.43717.
8
A model of late long-term potentiation simulates aspects of memory maintenance.长时程增强的晚期模型模拟了记忆维持的某些方面。
PLoS One. 2007 May 16;2(5):e445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000445.
9
Translational switch for long-term maintenance of synaptic plasticity.用于长期维持突触可塑性的翻译开关。
Mol Syst Biol. 2009;5:284. doi: 10.1038/msb.2009.38. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
10
Lifetime memories from persistently supple synapses.持久灵活的突触产生终生记忆。
Hippocampus. 2013 Mar;23(3):202-6. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22088. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the Papez circuit the location of the elusive episodic memory engram?帕佩兹环路是难以捉摸的情景记忆印迹的所在位置吗?
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2024 Feb 3;16:249-259. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.01.016. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Linking spontaneous and stimulated spine dynamics.连接自发和受刺激的脊柱动力学。
Commun Biol. 2023 Sep 11;6(1):930. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05303-1.
3
Dual Regulation of Spine-Specific and Synapse-to-Nucleus Signaling by PKCδ during Plasticity.蛋白激酶 Cδ在可塑性过程中对脊柱特异性和突触核信号的双重调节。

本文引用的文献

1
PKMζ Inhibition Disrupts Reconsolidation and Erases Object Recognition Memory.PKMζ 抑制破坏再巩固并消除物体识别记忆。
J Neurosci. 2019 Mar 6;39(10):1828-1841. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2270-18.2018. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
In memoriam: John Lisman - commentaries on CaMKII as a memory molecule.缅怀:约翰·利斯曼 - CaMKII 作为记忆分子的评论。
Mol Brain. 2018 Dec 28;11(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13041-018-0419-y.
3
Hippocampal Reactivation Extends for Several Hours Following Novel Experience.海马体在新体验后会重新活跃几个小时。
J Neurosci. 2023 Jul 26;43(30):5432-5447. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0208-22.2023. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
4
Strain-dependent regulation of hippocampal long-term potentiation by dopamine D1/D5 receptors in mice.多巴胺D1/D5受体对小鼠海马长时程增强的应变依赖性调节
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Dec 5;16:1023361. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1023361. eCollection 2022.
5
Neuromodulator-dependent synaptic tagging and capture retroactively controls neural coding in spiking neural networks.神经调质依赖性突触标记和捕获回溯性地控制尖峰神经网络中的神经编码。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 22;12(1):17772. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22430-7.
6
A computational model to explore how temporal stimulation patterns affect synapse plasticity.一种探索时间刺激模式如何影响突触可塑性的计算模型。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 23;17(9):e0275059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275059. eCollection 2022.
7
High Fat Diet Multigenerationally Affects Hippocampal Neural Stem Cell Proliferation via Epigenetic Mechanisms.高脂肪饮食通过表观遗传机制多代影响海马神经干细胞增殖。
Cells. 2022 Aug 27;11(17):2661. doi: 10.3390/cells11172661.
8
Computational analysis of memory consolidation following inhibitory avoidance (IA) training in adult and infant rats: Critical roles of CaMKIIα and MeCP2.成年和幼年大鼠抑制性回避(IA)训练后记忆巩固的计算分析:CaMKIIα 和 MeCP2 的关键作用。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jun 27;18(6):e1010239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010239. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Quantitative description of the interactions among kinase cascades underlying long-term plasticity of Aplysia sensory neurons.定量描述了 Aplysia 感觉神经元长时程可塑性的激酶级联反应之间的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 22;11(1):14931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94393-0.
10
Possible novel features of synaptic regulation during long-term facilitation in .在. 的长时程易化过程中突触调节的可能新特征。
Learn Mem. 2021 Jun 15;28(7):218-227. doi: 10.1101/lm.053124.120. Print 2021 Jul.
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 30;39(5):866-875. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1950-18.2018. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
4
Fast track to the neocortex: A memory engram in the posterior parietal cortex.快速进入新皮层:后顶叶皮层中的记忆印痕。
Science. 2018 Nov 30;362(6418):1045-1048. doi: 10.1126/science.aau2528.
5
Anterograde and retrograde signaling by an neurotrophin forms a transsynaptic functional unit.神经营养因子的顺行和逆行信号形成了一个突触功能性单元。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 13;115(46):E10951-E10960. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810650115. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
6
Bridging Synaptic and Epigenetic Maintenance Mechanisms of the Engram.桥接记忆印迹的突触和表观遗传维持机制
Front Mol Neurosci. 2018 Oct 5;11:369. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00369. eCollection 2018.
7
Human hippocampal replay during rest prioritizes weakly learned information and predicts memory performance.人类在休息时的海马体回放优先处理较弱学习到的信息,并预测记忆表现。
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 25;9(1):3920. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06213-1.
8
PKCα integrates spatiotemporally distinct Ca and autocrine BDNF signaling to facilitate synaptic plasticity.PKCα 整合时空上不同的 Ca 和自分泌 BDNF 信号,以促进突触可塑性。
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Aug;21(8):1027-1037. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0184-3. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
9
The role of engram cells in the systems consolidation of memory.记忆系统巩固中记忆痕迹细胞的作用。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Aug;19(8):485-498. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0031-2.
10
Calmodulin shuttling mediates cytonuclear signaling to trigger experience-dependent transcription and memory.钙调蛋白穿梭介导胞核信号转导,触发经验依赖性转录和记忆。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 22;9(1):2451. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04705-8.