Department of Basic Sciences, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11021 Campus Street, 101 Alumni Hall, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019 Mar 12;2019:1279250. doi: 10.1155/2019/1279250. eCollection 2019.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are common by-products of normal aerobic cellular metabolism and play important physiological roles in intracellular cell signaling and homeostasis. The human body is equipped with antioxidant systems to regulate the levels of these free radicals and maintain proper physiological function. However, a condition known as oxidative stress (OS) occurs, when ROS overwhelm the body's ability to readily detoxify them. Excessive amounts of free radicals generated under OS conditions cause oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, severely compromising cell health and contributing to disease development, including cancer. Biomarkers of OS can therefore be exploited as important tools in the assessment of disease status in humans. In the present review, we discuss different approaches used for the evaluation of OS in clinical samples. The described methods are limited in their ability to reflect on OS only partially, revealing the need of more integrative approaches examining both pro- and antioxidant reactions with higher sensitivity to physiological/pathological alternations. We also provide an overview of recent findings of OS in patients with different types of cancer. Identification of OS biomarkers in clinical samples of cancer patients and defining their roles in carcinogenesis hold great promise in promoting the development of targeted therapeutic approaches and diagnostic strategies assessing disease status. However, considerable data variability across laboratories makes it difficult to draw general conclusions on the significance of these OS biomarkers. To our knowledge, no adequate comparison has yet been performed between different biomarkers and the methodologies used to measure them, making it difficult to conduct a meta-analysis of findings from different groups. A critical evaluation and adaptation of proposed methodologies available in the literature should therefore be undertaken, to enable the investigators to choose the most suitable procedure for each chosen biomarker.
活性氧(ROS)是正常需氧细胞代谢的常见副产物,在细胞内信号转导和内稳态中发挥着重要的生理作用。人体配备有抗氧化系统来调节这些自由基的水平,维持适当的生理功能。然而,当 ROS 超过身体清除它们的能力时,就会发生一种称为氧化应激(OS)的情况。在 OS 条件下产生的大量自由基会对蛋白质、脂质和核酸造成氧化损伤,严重损害细胞健康,并导致疾病的发展,包括癌症。因此,OS 的生物标志物可以作为评估人类疾病状态的重要工具。在本综述中,我们讨论了用于评估临床样本中 OS 的不同方法。所描述的方法在反映 OS 方面存在局限性,只能部分揭示需要更综合的方法,这些方法需要同时检查促氧化剂和抗氧化剂反应,并具有更高的灵敏度以适应生理/病理变化。我们还概述了最近在不同类型癌症患者中 OS 的发现。在癌症患者的临床样本中鉴定 OS 生物标志物并确定它们在致癌作用中的作用,有望促进开发针对治疗方法和评估疾病状态的诊断策略。然而,不同实验室之间的数据变异性很大,使得很难对这些 OS 生物标志物的意义得出一般性结论。据我们所知,目前还没有对不同的生物标志物及其测量方法进行充分的比较,因此很难对来自不同组的研究结果进行荟萃分析。因此,应该对文献中提出的方法进行批判性评估和调整,以使研究人员能够为每个选定的生物标志物选择最合适的程序。