• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

捕捉合作挑战:为跨部门伙伴关系设计对复杂性敏感的变革理论

Capturing Collaborative Challenges: Designing Complexity-Sensitive Theories of Change for Cross-Sector Partnerships.

作者信息

van Tulder Rob, Keen Nienke

机构信息

1Partnerships Resource Centre, RSM Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

AgriProFocus, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Bus Ethics. 2018;150(2):315-332. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7
PMID:30996500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6435202/
Abstract

Systems change requires complex interventions. Cross-sector partnerships (CSPs) face the daunting task of addressing complex societal problems by aligning different backgrounds, values, ideas and resources. A major challenge for CSPs is how to link the type of partnership to the intervention needed to drive change. Intervention strategies are thereby increasingly based on Theories of Change (ToCs). Applying ToCs is often a donor requirement, but it also reflects the ambition of a partnership to enhance its transformative potential. The current use of ToCs in partnering efforts varies greatly. There is a tendency for a linear and relatively simple use of ToCs that does limited justice to the complexity of the problems partnerships aim to address. Since partnership dynamics are already complex and challenging themselves, confusion and disagreement over the appropriate application of ToCs is likely to hamper rather than enhance the transformative potential of partnerships. We develop a complexity alignment framework and a diagnostic tool that enables partnerships to better appreciate the complexity of the context in which they operate, allowing them to adjust their learning strategy. This paper applies recent insights into how to deal with complexity from both the evaluation and theory of change fields to studies investigating the transformative capacity of partnerships. This can (1) serve as a check to define the challenges of partnering projects and (2) can help delineate the societal sources and layers of complexity that cross-sector partnerships deal with such as failure, insufficient responsibility taking and collective action problems at four phases of partnering.

摘要

系统变革需要复杂的干预措施。跨部门伙伴关系(CSP)面临着一项艰巨的任务,即通过整合不同的背景、价值观、理念和资源来解决复杂的社会问题。CSP面临的一个主要挑战是如何将伙伴关系的类型与推动变革所需的干预措施联系起来。因此,干预策略越来越多地基于变革理论(ToC)。应用ToC通常是捐助方的要求,但它也反映了伙伴关系增强其变革潜力的抱负。目前ToC在伙伴关系努力中的应用差异很大。存在一种对ToC进行线性且相对简单应用的趋势,这对伙伴关系旨在解决的问题的复杂性处理得不够充分。由于伙伴关系动态本身就已经复杂且具有挑战性,对ToC的适当应用产生的困惑和分歧很可能会阻碍而不是增强伙伴关系的变革潜力。我们开发了一个复杂性匹配框架和一种诊断工具,使伙伴关系能够更好地理解其运作背景的复杂性,从而调整其学习策略。本文将评估领域和变革理论领域中关于如何应对复杂性的最新见解应用于研究伙伴关系变革能力的研究中。这可以(1)作为界定伙伴关系项目挑战的一种检验,(2)有助于描绘跨部门伙伴关系在伙伴关系的四个阶段所应对的社会复杂性来源和层次,例如失败、责任承担不足和集体行动问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb84/6435202/9735a6b2171b/10551_2018_3857_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb84/6435202/e4ad7c9d2d66/10551_2018_3857_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb84/6435202/9735a6b2171b/10551_2018_3857_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb84/6435202/e4ad7c9d2d66/10551_2018_3857_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb84/6435202/9735a6b2171b/10551_2018_3857_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Capturing Collaborative Challenges: Designing Complexity-Sensitive Theories of Change for Cross-Sector Partnerships.捕捉合作挑战:为跨部门伙伴关系设计对复杂性敏感的变革理论
J Bus Ethics. 2018;150(2):315-332. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
2
Complexity in partnerships: A qualitative examination of collaborative depression care in primary care clinics and community-based organisations in California, United States.合作伙伴关系的复杂性:对美国加利福尼亚州初级保健诊所和社区组织中合作性抑郁症护理的定性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Jul;28(4):1199-1208. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12953. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
3
Cross-sector partnerships and public health: challenges and opportunities for addressing obesity and noncommunicable diseases through engagement with the private sector.跨部门伙伴关系与公共卫生:通过与私营部门合作应对肥胖和非传染性疾病的挑战与机遇。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:255-71. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122802. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
4
Leveraging the power of partnerships: spreading the vision for a population health care delivery model in western Kenya.利用伙伴关系的力量:在肯尼亚西部传播全民医疗保健提供模式的愿景。
Global Health. 2018 May 8;14(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0366-5.
5
A Framework for Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Childhood Adversity and Improve Life Course Health.跨部门合作框架,以应对儿童期逆境并改善生命全程健康。
Pediatrics. 2022 May 1;149(Suppl 5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-053509O.
6
Realising the transformative potential of healthcare partnerships: insights from divergent literatures and contrasting cases in high- and low-income country contexts.实现医疗保健伙伴关系的变革潜力:来自高收入和低收入国家背景下不同文献和对比案例的见解。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;92:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
7
Social Work Grand Challenges: Leaders' Perceptions of the Potential for Partnering with Business.
Soc Work. 2018 Jul 1;63(3):201-209. doi: 10.1093/sw/swy015.
8
Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda.运用变革理论指导卫生系统研究与创新的实施:孟加拉国、印度和乌干达未来卫生系统联盟合作伙伴的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Dec 28;15(Suppl 2):109. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y.
9
Community health outreach program of the Chad-Cameroon petroleum development and pipeline project.乍得-喀麦隆石油开发与管道项目的社区卫生外展计划。
Clin Occup Environ Med. 2004 Feb;4(1):9-26. doi: 10.1016/j.coem.2003.09.004.
10
How to and how not to develop a theory of change to evaluate a complex intervention: reflections on an experience in the Democratic Republic of Congo.如何构建以及如何避免构建用于评估复杂干预措施的变革理论:对刚果民主共和国一段经历的反思
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Jan 3;3(1):e000617. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000617. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-Sector Collaboration to Improve Access to Community Services for People Living With Diabetes: Contributions From Actor-Network Theory.跨部门合作以改善糖尿病患者获得社区服务的机会:行动者网络理论的贡献
Health Serv Insights. 2024 Jan 27;17:11786329231222408. doi: 10.1177/11786329231222408. eCollection 2024.
2
Understanding transformative capacity to boost urban climate adaptation: A Semi-Systematic Literature Review.理解提升城市气候适应能力的变革能力:半系统文献综述。
Ambio. 2024 Feb;53(2):276-291. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01940-2. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
Place and the Structuring of Cross-Sector Partnerships: The Moral and Material Conflicts Over Healthcare and Homelessness.

本文引用的文献

1
Transnational multistakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Conditions for success.促进可持续发展的跨国多方利益相关者伙伴关系:成功的条件
Ambio. 2016 Feb;45(1):42-51. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0684-2. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
2
Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme.干预措施是否基于理论?理论编码方案的制定。
Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;29(1):1-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016939.
3
Criteria of effectiveness in multiple cross-sectoral interorganizational relationships.多部门跨组织关系中的有效性标准。
跨部门伙伴关系的地点与构建:医疗保健与无家可归问题上的道德与物质冲突
J Bus Ethics. 2023;184(4):933-955. doi: 10.1007/s10551-023-05360-w. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
4
Rainbow Wash or Rainbow Revolution? Dynamic Stakeholder Engagement for SDG-Driven Responsible Innovation.彩虹清洗还是彩虹革命?由可持续发展目标驱动的负责任创新的动态利益相关者参与。
J Bus Ethics. 2022;180(4):1113-1136. doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05190-2. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
5
Eco-Efficiency and Private Firms' Relationships with Heterogeneous Public Stakeholders in China.生态效率与中国私营企业与异质公共利益相关者的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 24;17(19):6983. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17196983.
6
Developing a Theory of Change model of service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in primary health care in rural Ethiopia.构建一个关于埃塞俄比亚农村地区初级卫生保健中服务使用者和照护者参与精神卫生系统强化的变革理论模型。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Jul 23;14:51. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00383-6. eCollection 2020.
7
Cross-Sector Partnerships for Systemic Change: Systematized Literature Review and Agenda for Further Research.促进系统性变革的跨部门伙伴关系:系统化文献综述与进一步研究议程
J Bus Ethics. 2018;150(2):303-313. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3922-2. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
Eval Program Plann. 2009 Feb;32(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Oct 5.
4
Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility.战略与社会:竞争优势与企业社会责任之间的联系
Harv Bus Rev. 2006 Dec;84(12):78-92, 163.