Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience.
Boris Centre for Addictions Research.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Feb;28(1):55-64. doi: 10.1037/pha0000282.
Risk-taking behavior can result in a range of maladaptive behaviors such as illicit substance use, unsafe driving, and high-risk sexual behavior. Perception of risk and preference for engaging in risky behaviors have been measured using both self-report measures and a range of behavioral tasks designed for the purpose, and these may predict future risk-taking behavior. However, the interrelationships between these measures and the latent constructs underlying them are poorly understood. In the present study, we examined data from over 1,000 men and women who completed measures of risk-related behaviors, including self-reports of perception of risk, propensity to engage in risky behaviors, and incentivized performance on tasks that involve risk. We conducted principal component analyses (PCAs) to understand the underlying latent structure of these measures. A PCA with the full sample revealed 5 distinct components, corresponding to measures of (a) health/ethical risks, (b) discounting of uncertain rewards, (c) risk of personal finances, (d) preferences in recreational hobbies and social interactions that involve risk, and (e) behavior involving risks in interpersonal interactions. Although we found sex differences on several of the measures, the sex-adjusted PCA components were similar to those of the unadjusted full sample PCA. These findings add to a growing literature revealing different components of the broad category of risk perception and risk-taking behaviors. A better understanding of the multidimensionality of risk preference will help lay the foundation for more refined measures, develop better predictors of future risk-taking behavior, and ultimately to study the genetic or other biological basis of risk-taking. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
冒险行为可能导致一系列适应不良的行为,如非法药物使用、不安全驾驶和高风险性行为。风险感知和参与冒险行为的偏好已经通过自我报告测量和一系列专门设计的行为任务来测量,这些测量方法可能预测未来的冒险行为。然而,这些测量方法之间以及它们所依据的潜在结构之间的相互关系理解得还很差。在本研究中,我们检查了超过 1000 名男性和女性的数据,他们完成了与风险相关的行为的测量,包括对风险感知的自我报告、参与冒险行为的倾向以及涉及风险的奖励任务的激励表现。我们进行了主成分分析(PCA),以了解这些测量方法的潜在潜在结构。对全样本进行的 PCA 显示出 5 个不同的成分,对应于(a)健康/道德风险、(b)不确定奖励的折扣、(c)个人财务风险、(d)涉及风险的娱乐爱好和社会互动偏好,以及(e)涉及人际互动风险的行为。尽管我们在几个测量方法上发现了性别差异,但性别调整后的 PCA 成分与未调整的全样本 PCA 成分相似。这些发现增加了越来越多的文献,揭示了风险感知和冒险行为的广泛类别中的不同成分。更好地了解风险偏好的多维性将有助于为更精细的测量方法奠定基础,开发未来冒险行为的更好预测指标,并最终研究冒险行为的遗传或其他生物学基础。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。