• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Older Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 23;73(15):1890-1900. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.055.
2
Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Feb 27;71(8):844-856. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.028.
3
Revascularization Practices and Outcomes in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Who Presented With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock in the US, 2009-2018.2009-2018 年美国急性心肌梗死伴心原性休克多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建实践和结局。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1317-1327. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3276.
4
Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis.罪犯血管血运重建与多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心原性休克的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者:一项协作荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005582.
5
Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct-Related Artery-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死伴心原性休克患者行多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与梗死相关动脉血运重建的长期临床结局比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Dec 17;8(24):e013870. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013870. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
6
Implementation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation before primary percutaneous coronary intervention may improve the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and refractory cardiogenic shock.体外膜肺氧合在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前的实施可能会提高 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并难治性心原性休克患者的生存率。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 15;269:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
7
Prognostic significance of emergency department bypass in stable and unstable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.急诊分诊对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死稳定和不稳定患者的预后意义。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Mar;9(1_suppl):34-44. doi: 10.1177/2048872618813907. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
8
Trends of Incidence, Clinical Presentation, and In-Hospital Mortality Among Women With Acute Myocardial Infarction With or Without Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Population-Based Analysis.急性心肌梗死伴或不伴自发性冠状动脉夹层女性患者的发病率、临床表现和住院死亡率趋势:一项基于人群的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
9
Electrocardiographic patterns and clinical outcomes of acute coronary syndrome cardiogenic shock in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention - A propensity score analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中急性冠状动脉综合征心原性休克患者的心电图模式和临床结局 - 倾向评分分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Aug;65:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.02.022. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
10
Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset.英国经溶栓治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中穿刺部位操作对临床结局的影响:来自英国心血管介入学会数据集的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 27;10(22):2258-2265. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.049.

引用本文的文献

1
Synergistic effects of NF-κB1 and inflammatory pathway polymorphisms on hypertension and dyslipidemia susceptibility in type 2 diabetes.NF-κB1与炎症通路基因多态性对2型糖尿病患者高血压和血脂异常易感性的协同作用
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Jul 16;17(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13098-025-01861-y.
2
The Utility and Validation of SCAI-CSWG Stages in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock.SCAI-CSWG分期在急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克患者中的效用及验证
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Nov 19;4(1):102461. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102461. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Clinical Review of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction - Revascularization, Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Beyond.急性心肌梗死后心源性休克的临床综述——血运重建、机械循环支持及其他。
Circ Rep. 2024 Nov 29;7(1):6-14. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0141. eCollection 2025 Jan 10.
4
Clinical and Biological Markers of Frailty Syndrome in Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者衰弱综合征的临床和生物学标志物
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Nov 26;14(23):2663. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232663.
5
The Impact of Frailty on Patients With AF and HFrEF Undergoing Catheter Ablation: A Nationwide Population Study.衰弱对接受导管消融术的房颤合并射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的影响:一项全国性人群研究。
JACC Adv. 2024 Nov 7;3(11):101358. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101358. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Association Between Frailty and Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.衰弱与急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的管理及预后之间的关联
JACC Adv. 2024 May 17;3(6):100949. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100949. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Frailty and In-Hospital Outcomes for Management of Cardiogenic Shock without Acute Myocardial Infarction.非急性心肌梗死所致心源性休克管理中的衰弱与院内结局
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 3;13(7):2078. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072078.
8
Chronological vs Biological Age in Interventional Cardiology: A Comprehensive Approach to Care for Older Adults: JACC Family Series.介入心脏病学中的时间年龄与生物年龄:为老年患者提供全面关怀的综合方法:JACC 家族系列。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Apr 22;17(8):961-978. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.01.284. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
9
The prevalence and outcomes in STEMI patients aged ≥75 undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in China.中国年龄≥75岁的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患病率及预后。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024 Mar 3;21:200251. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200251. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults: A Focus on Age-Associated Risks and Approach to Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.老年人心源性休克:关注与年龄相关的风险和管理方法:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2024 Apr 2;149(14):e1051-e1065. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001214. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation.实用随机对照试验中的伦理问题:对近期文献的综述揭示了伦理论证方面的差距。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x.
2
Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.当代心源性休克管理:美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):e232-e268. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
3
Better-Not Just Bigger-Data Analytics.更好——而非仅仅是更多数据——的数据分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jul;10(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004019.
4
With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Big Data Research From the National Inpatient Sample.能力越大,责任越大:来自全国住院患者样本的大数据研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jul;10(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003846.
5
Knowledge Gaps in Cardiovascular Care of the Older Adult Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and American Geriatrics Society.老年人群心血管护理中的知识空白:美国心脏协会、美国心脏病学会和美国老年医学会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2016 May 24;133(21):2103-22. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000380. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
6
Executive Summary: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.执行摘要:《2016年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):447-54. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000366.
7
Changing Trends in, and Characteristics Associated with, Not Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization in Elderly Adults Hospitalized with ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死住院老年患者未接受心脏导管插入术的变化趋势及相关特征
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 May;63(5):925-31. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13399. Epub 2015 May 4.
8
The effect of hospital volume on mortality in patients admitted with severe sepsis.医院规模对严重脓毒症入院患者死亡率的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 29;9(9):e108754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108754. eCollection 2014.
9
Prognosis of elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 2001 to 2011: A report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) registry.2001 年至 2011 年行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的预后:来自瑞典冠状动脉造影及血管成形术登记处(SCAAR)登记的报告。
Am Heart J. 2014 May;167(5):666-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
10
Comparative effectiveness of early versus conventional timing of dialysis initiation in advanced CKD.晚期慢性肾脏病患者中早期与常规开始透析时机的比较效果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 May;63(5):806-15. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Older Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

机构信息

Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, LifeBridge Health Cardiovascular Institute, Baltimore, Maryland; Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 23;73(15):1890-1900. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.055.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.055
PMID:30999991
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7185801/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults ≥75 years of age carry an increased risk of mortality after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in older adults with STEMI and shock and its influence on in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

We used a large publicly available all-payer inpatient health care database sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality between 1999 and 2013. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The influence of PCI on in-hospital mortality was assessed by quintiles of propensity score (PS).

RESULTS

Of the 317,728 encounters with STEMI and shock in the United States, 111,901 (35%) were adults age ≥75 years. Of these, 53% were women and 83% were Caucasians. The median number of chronic conditions was 8 (interquartile range: 6 to 10). The diagnosis of STEMI and cardiogenic shock in older patients decreased significantly over time (proportion of older adults with STEMI and shock: 1999: 42% vs. 2013: 29%). Concomitantly, the rate of PCI utilization in older adults increased (1999: 27% vs. 2013: 56%, p < 0.001), with declining in-hospital mortality rates (1999: 64% vs. 2013: 46%; p < 0.001). Utilizing PS matching methods, PCI was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality across quintiles of propensity score (Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45 to 0.51). This reduction in hospital mortality risk was seen across the 4 different U.S. census bureau regions (adjusted odds ratio: Northeast: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.47; Midwest: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.57; South: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.56; West: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.53).

CONCLUSIONS

This large and contemporary analysis shows that utilization of PCI in older adults with STEMI and cardiogenic shock is increasing and paralleled by a substantial reduction in mortality. Although clinical judgment is critical, older adults should not be excluded from early revascularization based on age in the absence of absolute contraindications.

摘要

背景

年龄≥75 岁的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)合并心原性休克的患者死亡率较高。

目的

本研究旨在研究经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在 STEMI 合并休克的老年患者中的应用及其对院内死亡率的影响。

方法

我们使用了 1999 年至 2013 年期间由美国医疗保健研究与质量局赞助的一个大型公开的全支付住院医疗保健数据库。主要结局是院内死亡率。通过倾向评分(PS)五分位数评估 PCI 对院内死亡率的影响。

结果

在美国 317728 例 STEMI 合并休克的患者中,有 111901 例(35%)为年龄≥75 岁的成年人。其中,53%为女性,83%为白种人。中位慢性疾病数为 8 种(四分位间距:6 至 10)。老年患者的 STEMI 和心原性休克的诊断在过去的时间里明显减少(年龄≥75 岁的 STEMI 和休克患者的比例:1999 年:42% vs. 2013 年:29%)。同时,老年患者中 PCI 的使用率增加(1999 年:27% vs. 2013 年:56%,p<0.001),院内死亡率也随之下降(1999 年:64% vs. 2013 年:46%;p<0.001)。利用 PS 匹配方法,在倾向评分的五分位数中,PCI 与较低的院内死亡率风险相关(Mantel-Haenszel 优势比:0.48;95%置信区间[CI]:0.45 至 0.51)。这种降低院内死亡率的风险在 4 个不同的美国人口普查局区域都有体现(调整后的优势比:东北部:0.41;95%CI:0.36 至 0.47;中西部:0.49;95%CI:0.42 至 0.57;南部:0.51;95%CI:0.46 至 0.56;西部:0.46;95%CI:0.41 至 0.53)。

结论

这项大型的当代分析表明,在 STEMI 合并心原性休克的老年患者中,PCI 的应用正在增加,同时死亡率也大幅降低。尽管临床判断至关重要,但在没有绝对禁忌症的情况下,不应该因为年龄而将老年患者排除在早期血运重建之外。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/7185801/6a2d96e24690/nihms-1522511-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/7185801/31f2f68e1865/nihms-1522511-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/7185801/ad99e8ab89c6/nihms-1522511-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/7185801/85ca21c0c8ae/nihms-1522511-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/7185801/d261976b0a9d/nihms-1522511-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/7185801/6a2d96e24690/nihms-1522511-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/7185801/31f2f68e1865/nihms-1522511-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/7185801/ad99e8ab89c6/nihms-1522511-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/7185801/85ca21c0c8ae/nihms-1522511-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/7185801/d261976b0a9d/nihms-1522511-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/7185801/6a2d96e24690/nihms-1522511-f0005.jpg