Suppr超能文献

道歉通过感知到的可信度和负面情绪修复信任。

Apologies Repair Trust via Perceived Trustworthiness and Negative Emotions.

作者信息

Ma Fengling, Wylie Breanne E, Luo Xianming, He Zhenfen, Jiang Rong, Zhang Yuling, Xu Fen, Evans Angela D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 3;10:758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00758. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

The present study examined whether perceptions of a transgressor's trustworthiness mediates the relationship between apologies and repaired trust, and the moderating role of negative emotions within this process. Chinese undergraduate students ( = 221) completed a trust game where they invested tokens in their counterpart, and either experienced no trust violation (i.e., half of the tokens returned), a trust violation (i.e., no tokens returned), or a trust violation followed by an apology. Participant's trust behavior was measured by the number of tokens they re-invested in their counterpart in a second round of the game. Participants also completed measures to assess perceptions of the transgressor's trustworthiness and emotional state. Results revealed that participants who received an apology were more likely to trust in their counterpart, compared to those who did not receive an apology, and this relationship was mediated by perceptions of the transgressor's trustworthiness. Further, the relationship between apologies and perceptions of the transgressors trustworthiness was moderated by negative emotions; apologies only improved perceptions of trustworthiness for participants who experienced less negative emotions.

摘要

本研究考察了对违规者可信赖性的认知是否介导了道歉与修复后的信任之间的关系,以及消极情绪在此过程中的调节作用。中国本科生(n = 221)完成了一个信任游戏,他们在游戏中向对方投入代币,有的没有经历信任违背(即对方返还一半代币),有的经历了信任违背(即对方没有返还代币),还有的经历了信任违背后得到了道歉。参与者的信任行为通过他们在第二轮游戏中再次投入给对方的代币数量来衡量。参与者还完成了评估对违规者可信赖性和情绪状态的测量。结果显示,与未收到道歉的参与者相比,收到道歉的参与者更有可能信任对方,并且这种关系是由对违规者可信赖性的认知介导的。此外,道歉与对违规者可信赖性的认知之间的关系受到消极情绪的调节;道歉仅对经历较少消极情绪的参与者改善了对可信赖性的认知。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/dfe48fea4544/fpsyg-10-00758-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Apologies Repair Trust via Perceived Trustworthiness and Negative Emotions.
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 3;10:758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00758. eCollection 2019.
2
Apologies repair children's trust: The mediating role of emotions.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Dec;176:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
3
How transgressor's moral identity leads to high-quality apologies: The positive effects of guilt.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul;62(3):1486-1505. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12644. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
4
Verbal or Written? The Impact of Apology on the Repair of Trust: Based on Competence- vs. Integrity-Based Trust Violation.
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:884867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884867. eCollection 2022.
5
Power as an emotional liability: Implications for perceived authenticity and trust after a transgression.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Oct;146(10):1379-1401. doi: 10.1037/xge0000292.
6
Why group apologies succeed and fail: intergroup forgiveness and the role of primary and secondary emotions.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Feb;102(2):306-22. doi: 10.1037/a0024838. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
7
The Social Consequences of Frequent Versus Infrequent Apologizing.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Mar;49(3):331-343. doi: 10.1177/01461672211065286. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
8
The mutuality of social emotions: How the victim's reactive attitude influences the transgressor's emotional responses.
Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 1;244:118631. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118631. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
9
Predictable and predictive emotions: explaining cheap signals and trust re-extension.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Nov 20;8:401. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00401. eCollection 2014.
10
Perceiving the facial trustworthiness: Facial age, emotional expression, and attractiveness.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 May;75(5):818-829. doi: 10.1177/17470218211047176. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Betrayal on Emotional Modulation of Executive Control: Evidence From ERPs.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Dec 1;45(17):e70088. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70088.
2
From virility to virtue: the psychology of apology in honor cultures.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 11;119(41):e2210324119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210324119. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
3
Verbal or Written? The Impact of Apology on the Repair of Trust: Based on Competence- vs. Integrity-Based Trust Violation.
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:884867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884867. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Trust, Punishment, and Cooperation Across 18 Societies: A Meta-Analysis.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul;8(4):363-79. doi: 10.1177/1745691613488533.
3
Predictable and predictive emotions: explaining cheap signals and trust re-extension.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Nov 20;8:401. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00401. eCollection 2014.
4
Effect of relationship experience on trust recovery following a breach.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 17;110(38):15236-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314857110. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
5
How implicit beliefs influence trust recovery.
Psychol Sci. 2010 May;21(5):645-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797610367752. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
7
Target and observer differences in the acceptance of questionable apologies.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(3):418-33. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.418.
8
Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 May;88(5):736-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736.
9
Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions.
Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:569-98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569.
10
Altruistic punishment in humans.
Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):137-40. doi: 10.1038/415137a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验