• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

道歉通过感知到的可信度和负面情绪修复信任。

Apologies Repair Trust via Perceived Trustworthiness and Negative Emotions.

作者信息

Ma Fengling, Wylie Breanne E, Luo Xianming, He Zhenfen, Jiang Rong, Zhang Yuling, Xu Fen, Evans Angela D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 3;10:758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00758. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00758
PMID:31001183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6457316/
Abstract

The present study examined whether perceptions of a transgressor's trustworthiness mediates the relationship between apologies and repaired trust, and the moderating role of negative emotions within this process. Chinese undergraduate students ( = 221) completed a trust game where they invested tokens in their counterpart, and either experienced no trust violation (i.e., half of the tokens returned), a trust violation (i.e., no tokens returned), or a trust violation followed by an apology. Participant's trust behavior was measured by the number of tokens they re-invested in their counterpart in a second round of the game. Participants also completed measures to assess perceptions of the transgressor's trustworthiness and emotional state. Results revealed that participants who received an apology were more likely to trust in their counterpart, compared to those who did not receive an apology, and this relationship was mediated by perceptions of the transgressor's trustworthiness. Further, the relationship between apologies and perceptions of the transgressors trustworthiness was moderated by negative emotions; apologies only improved perceptions of trustworthiness for participants who experienced less negative emotions.

摘要

本研究考察了对违规者可信赖性的认知是否介导了道歉与修复后的信任之间的关系,以及消极情绪在此过程中的调节作用。中国本科生(n = 221)完成了一个信任游戏,他们在游戏中向对方投入代币,有的没有经历信任违背(即对方返还一半代币),有的经历了信任违背(即对方没有返还代币),还有的经历了信任违背后得到了道歉。参与者的信任行为通过他们在第二轮游戏中再次投入给对方的代币数量来衡量。参与者还完成了评估对违规者可信赖性和情绪状态的测量。结果显示,与未收到道歉的参与者相比,收到道歉的参与者更有可能信任对方,并且这种关系是由对违规者可信赖性的认知介导的。此外,道歉与对违规者可信赖性的认知之间的关系受到消极情绪的调节;道歉仅对经历较少消极情绪的参与者改善了对可信赖性的认知。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/2b863a982661/fpsyg-10-00758-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/dfe48fea4544/fpsyg-10-00758-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/0b01cb622ea2/fpsyg-10-00758-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/5ad364909488/fpsyg-10-00758-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/94e964f29df7/fpsyg-10-00758-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/aaa6e586165d/fpsyg-10-00758-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/2b863a982661/fpsyg-10-00758-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/dfe48fea4544/fpsyg-10-00758-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/0b01cb622ea2/fpsyg-10-00758-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/5ad364909488/fpsyg-10-00758-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/94e964f29df7/fpsyg-10-00758-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/aaa6e586165d/fpsyg-10-00758-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/6457316/2b863a982661/fpsyg-10-00758-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Apologies Repair Trust via Perceived Trustworthiness and Negative Emotions.道歉通过感知到的可信度和负面情绪修复信任。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 3;10:758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00758. eCollection 2019.
2
Apologies repair children's trust: The mediating role of emotions.道歉修复儿童的信任:情绪的中介作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Dec;176:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
3
How transgressor's moral identity leads to high-quality apologies: The positive effects of guilt.违规者的道德身份如何促成高质量道歉:内疚的积极作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul;62(3):1486-1505. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12644. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
4
Verbal or Written? The Impact of Apology on the Repair of Trust: Based on Competence- vs. Integrity-Based Trust Violation.口头还是书面?道歉对信任修复的影响:基于能力型与诚信型信任违背
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:884867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884867. eCollection 2022.
5
Power as an emotional liability: Implications for perceived authenticity and trust after a transgression.权力是一种情感负债:侵犯后对感知真实性和信任的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Oct;146(10):1379-1401. doi: 10.1037/xge0000292.
6
Why group apologies succeed and fail: intergroup forgiveness and the role of primary and secondary emotions.为什么群体道歉会成功或失败:群体间的宽恕与主要和次要情绪的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Feb;102(2):306-22. doi: 10.1037/a0024838. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
7
The Social Consequences of Frequent Versus Infrequent Apologizing.频繁道歉与偶尔道歉的社会后果。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Mar;49(3):331-343. doi: 10.1177/01461672211065286. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
8
The mutuality of social emotions: How the victim's reactive attitude influences the transgressor's emotional responses.社会情绪的相互性:受害者的反应态度如何影响侵犯者的情绪反应。
Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 1;244:118631. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118631. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
9
Predictable and predictive emotions: explaining cheap signals and trust re-extension.可预测和具有预测性的情绪:解释廉价信号与信任重建。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Nov 20;8:401. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00401. eCollection 2014.
10
Perceiving the facial trustworthiness: Facial age, emotional expression, and attractiveness.感知面部可信度:面部年龄、表情和吸引力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 May;75(5):818-829. doi: 10.1177/17470218211047176. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Betrayal on Emotional Modulation of Executive Control: Evidence From ERPs.背叛对执行控制情绪调节的影响:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Dec 1;45(17):e70088. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70088.
2
From virility to virtue: the psychology of apology in honor cultures.从男子气概到美德:荣誉文化中的道歉心理学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 11;119(41):e2210324119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210324119. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
3
Verbal or Written? The Impact of Apology on the Repair of Trust: Based on Competence- vs. Integrity-Based Trust Violation.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lightweight fibreglass heel casts in the management of ulcers of the heel in diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.轻质玻璃纤维足跟支具治疗糖尿病足跟溃疡的有效性及成本效果评价:一项随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2017 May;21(34):1-92. doi: 10.3310/hta21340.
2
Trust, Punishment, and Cooperation Across 18 Societies: A Meta-Analysis.信任、惩罚与合作:跨越 18 个社会的综合分析。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul;8(4):363-79. doi: 10.1177/1745691613488533.
3
Predictable and predictive emotions: explaining cheap signals and trust re-extension.
口头还是书面?道歉对信任修复的影响:基于能力型与诚信型信任违背
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:884867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884867. eCollection 2022.
可预测和具有预测性的情绪:解释廉价信号与信任重建。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Nov 20;8:401. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00401. eCollection 2014.
4
Effect of relationship experience on trust recovery following a breach.关系经验对违背后信任恢复的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 17;110(38):15236-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314857110. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
5
How implicit beliefs influence trust recovery.内隐信念如何影响信任恢复。
Psychol Sci. 2010 May;21(5):645-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797610367752. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
6
Silence speaks volumes: the effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity- and competence-based trust violations.沉默胜过千言万语:相较于道歉和否认,沉默在应对基于正直和能力的信任侵犯时的有效性。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):893-908. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.893.
7
Target and observer differences in the acceptance of questionable apologies.在对可疑道歉的接受度上目标与观察者的差异
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(3):418-33. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.418.
8
Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust.感受与信任:情感对信任的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 May;88(5):736-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736.
9
Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions.组织中的信任与不信任:新出现的观点,持久的问题。
Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:569-98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569.
10
Altruistic punishment in humans.人类中的利他惩罚。
Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):137-40. doi: 10.1038/415137a.