Matner Richard R, Fox Terrance L, McIver Dawn E, Curiale Michael S
Medical-Surgical Division, 270-3N-04, 3M Center, St. Paul, MN 55144; Riker Laboratories, 270-3A-01 3M Center, St. Paul, MN 55144; Silliker Laboratories, Inc., 1304 Halsted Street, Chicago, Heights, Illinois 60411.
J Food Prot. 1990 Feb;53(2):145-150. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-53.2.145.
The Petrifilm E. coli Count plate (PEC) method was compared to the AOAC MPN method to determine the efficacy of the PEC method to detect E. coli and coliforms in 115 inoculated cheese samples, 94 vegetables samples, and in 100 naturally contaminated poultry samples. The PEC method was compared to two other coliform plate count methods. The 24 h PEC method is as good as or better than the AOAC MPN method for the detection of E. coli. In addition, qualitative results suggest that the PEC method may be more sensitive than the 9 tube MPN method for the detection of very low numbers of E. coli. Comparable coliform results were obtained.
将Petrifilm大肠杆菌计数平板(PEC)法与美国官方分析化学师协会(AOAC)的最大可能数(MPN)法进行比较,以确定PEC法检测115份接种奶酪样品、94份蔬菜样品和100份自然污染家禽样品中大肠杆菌和大肠菌群的效果。将PEC法与其他两种大肠菌群平板计数法进行比较。24小时PEC法在检测大肠杆菌方面与AOAC MPN法一样好或更好。此外,定性结果表明,在检测极少量大肠杆菌时,PEC法可能比9管MPN法更灵敏。两种方法获得的大肠菌群结果相当。