• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目的明确吗?医院工作场所的组织生产力和劳动力健康状况(FLOURISH):一项多方法定性研究方案。

Fit for purpose? OrganisationaL prOdUctivity and woRkforce wellbeIng in workSpaces in Hospital (FLOURISH): a multimethod qualitative study protocol.

机构信息

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e027636. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027636.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027636
PMID:31005940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6500262/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Workspaces are socially constructed environments where social relationships are produced, reproduced, challenged and transformed. Their primary function is to support high-quality service delivery to the benefit of 'patients'. They are also settings where employees can work effectively, in a safe and healthy environment, delivering a high-quality service according to a 'Work-As-Done' rather than a 'Work-As-Imagined' model. However, hospital design is currently based on a managerial understanding of work accomplishments, often falling short of understanding what is actually happening on the ground. Furthermore, the research landscape lacks rigorous assessment of these complex sociological and health research concepts, either within the Australian context where this protocol is set, or internationally.This paper describes an innovative protocol aimed at examining healthcare employees' and organisations' concerns and beliefs in workspace design. It outlines research investigating the effect of workspace use on productivity, health and safety and worker satisfaction, to clarify Work-As-Done, while creating healthy and more fulfilling environments.

METHODS

This is a proof-of-concept study, taking place between June 2018 and April 2019, employing a multimethod, qualitative approach for in-depth assessment of one Australian, private, university hospital environment, using as its 'case' the Gastroenterology Surgical Unit. It involves (1) observations and informal interviews (shadowing) with employees and patients as they traverse hospital spaces and (2) visual data of spatial use. Fieldnotes will be analysed thematically, and visual data analysed using a predefined schematic framework (a visual taxonomy). Overarching themes and categories will be considered corroboratively, mixing visual and textual data to build an iterative and dynamic picture.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical considerations will be discussed, while approval has been granted by the University's Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/5201800282), along with Governance approved by the Health Clinical Research Executive (CRG2018005). Study results will be disseminated through publications, research conferences and public reports.

摘要

简介

工作空间是社会构建的环境,在这里产生、再现、挑战和改变社会关系。其主要功能是支持高质量的服务交付,造福“患者”。它们也是员工可以在安全和健康的环境中有效工作的场所,根据“实际完成的工作”而不是“想象中的工作”模型提供高质量的服务。然而,医院设计目前基于对工作成果的管理理解,往往无法理解实际发生的情况。此外,研究领域缺乏对这些复杂的社会学和健康研究概念的严格评估,无论是在本协议设定的澳大利亚背景下,还是在国际范围内。本文描述了一种创新方案,旨在研究医疗保健员工和组织对工作空间设计的关注和信念。它概述了研究工作空间使用对生产力、健康和安全以及工人满意度的影响,以澄清实际完成的工作,同时创造健康和更有意义的环境。

方法

这是一项概念验证研究,于 2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 4 月进行,采用多方法、定性方法对澳大利亚一家私立大学医院环境进行深入评估,以胃肠外科单元为“案例”。它包括(1)对员工和患者在医院空间中穿行时的观察和非正式访谈(跟踪观察),以及(2)空间使用的视觉数据。实地记录将进行主题分析,视觉数据将使用预定义的示意框架(视觉分类法)进行分析。将综合考虑主题和类别,混合视觉和文本数据以构建迭代和动态的图片。

伦理和传播

将讨论伦理考虑因素,同时已获得大学人类研究伦理委员会(HREC/5201800282)的批准,以及健康临床研究执行委员会(CRG2018005)批准的治理。研究结果将通过出版物、研究会议和公开报告进行传播。

相似文献

1
Fit for purpose? OrganisationaL prOdUctivity and woRkforce wellbeIng in workSpaces in Hospital (FLOURISH): a multimethod qualitative study protocol.目的明确吗?医院工作场所的组织生产力和劳动力健康状况(FLOURISH):一项多方法定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e027636. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027636.
2
A mobile methods pilot study of surgical spaces: 'fit for purpose? Organisational productivity and workforce wellbeing in workspaces in hospital' (FLOURISH).移动方法在手术室中的试点研究:“适合目的吗?医院工作空间中的组织生产力和劳动力幸福感”(FLOURISH)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4938-8.
3
Communicating risk in active surveillance of localised prostate cancer: a protocol for a qualitative study.局部前列腺癌主动监测中的风险沟通:一项定性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 5;7(10):e017372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017372.
4
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Multilevel influences on resilient healthcare in six countries: an international comparative study protocol.多层次影响下六个国家的弹性医疗保健:一项国际比较研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 4;10(12):e039158. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039158.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Providing person-centred care for people with multiple chronic conditions: protocol for a qualitative study incorporating client and staff perspectives.为患有多种慢性疾病的人提供以患者为中心的护理:一项纳入患者和工作人员观点的定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e030581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030581.
9
Qualitative, multimethod study of behavioural and attitudinal responses to cochlear implantation from the patient and healthcare professional perspective in Australia and the UK: study protocol.从患者和医疗保健专业人员角度对澳大利亚和英国人工耳蜗植入行为和态度反应的定性多方法研究:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 May 29;8(5):e019623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019623.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of consensus-based perioperative care pathways to reduce clinical variation for elective surgery in an Australian private hospital: a mixed-methods pre-post study protocol.基于共识的围手术期护理路径在澳大利亚私立医院择期手术中减少临床变异性的实施:一项混合方法的前后研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 26;13(7):e075008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075008.
2
The rise of rapid implementation: a worked example of solving an existing problem with a new method by combining concept analysis with a systematic integrative review.快速实施的兴起:通过将概念分析与系统综合评价相结合,用新方法解决现有问题的实例分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 21;20(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05289-0.
3
A mobile methods pilot study of surgical spaces: 'fit for purpose? Organisational productivity and workforce wellbeing in workspaces in hospital' (FLOURISH).移动方法在手术室中的试点研究:“适合目的吗?医院工作空间中的组织生产力和劳动力幸福感”(FLOURISH)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4938-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing the Needs of an Aging Population in the Health System: The Australian Case.满足卫生系统中老龄人口的需求:以澳大利亚为例。
Health Syst Reform. 2017 Jul 3;3(3):236-247. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2017.1358796.
2
Burnout in the medical profession: not a rite of passage.医学职业倦怠:并非必经之路。
Med J Aust. 2018 Jun 18;208(11):471-472. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00891.
3
Quality of Health Care for Children in Australia, 2012-2013.2012 - 2013年澳大利亚儿童的医疗保健质量
JAMA. 2018 Mar 20;319(11):1113-1124. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0162.
4
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.医疗差错——美国第三大死因。
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
5
Eleven themes of patient-centred professionalism in community pharmacy: innovative approaches to consulting.社区药房以患者为中心的专业精神的 11 个主题:咨询的创新方法。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Oct;18(5):260-8. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00056.x.
6
Medical errors increasing because of complexity of care and breakdown in doctor-patient relationship, physician consultant says.医生顾问表示,由于医疗护理的复杂性以及医患关系的破裂,医疗差错正在增加。
CMAJ. 2010 Sep 21;182(13):E645-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3344. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
7
"Convenient space" or "a tight squeeze": insider views on the community pharmacy.“便利空间”还是“拥挤不堪”:社区药房的内部视角
Health Place. 2009 Mar;15(1):315-22. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
8
Understanding and representing 'place' in health research: a relational approach.理解并呈现健康研究中的“场所”:一种关系性方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(9):1825-38. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.036. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
9
Snapshots and snippets: general practitioners' reflections on professional space.快照与片段:全科医生对职业空间的反思
Health Place. 2007 Jun;13(2):532-44. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.07.005. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
10
From manila to monitor: biographies of general practitioner workspaces.从马尼拉到监视器:全科医生工作空间的传记。
Health (London). 2006 Apr;10(2):233-51. doi: 10.1177/1363459306061790.