Aminizadeh Mohsen, Rasouli Ghahfarokhi Seyedeh Moloud, Pourvakhshoori Negar, Beyramijam Mehdi, Majidi Nader, Shahabi Rabori Mohammad Ali
Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Emergency Operation Center, Disasters and Emergencies Management Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Mar 14;8:54. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_323_18. eCollection 2019.
Assessing the clinical skills of prehospital Intermediate technician is considered to be one of the priorities in dealing with diseases, which may provide an appropriate reflection of the training programs. The purpose of this study was to compare the two methods of clinical skills training of emergency intermediate technician.
This quasi-experiment was carried out on Kerman's emergency medical technicians in 2017. Operational and clinical skills, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), triage, familiarity with the equipment, and proper patient transportation methods, were taught in both electronic and traditional methods on two groups, each consisting of 30 intermediate technicians. Finally, the personnel's satisfaction level with the two teaching methods was compared and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
There was no significant difference between the theoretical test scores in both the electronic and traditional methods in all the participants (triage, pulmonary resuscitation, familiarity with equipment, and patient transportation). Furthermore, there were significant differences between the practical test scores in both the electronic and traditional methods, in all the participants except triage. There was a significant difference between learners' satisfaction in both electronic and traditional methods in two areas of teaching and course difficulty in CPR, equipment usage, and methods of transportation.
According to the results obtained by the present study, the electronic educational systems due to their inclusive and interactive nature are recommended to be employed in courses that have more theoretical aspects such as triage. The traditional method is suggested in teaching practical courses such as CPR that need more practical and clinical skills.
评估院前中级技术人员的临床技能被认为是疾病诊治中的重点之一,这可以适当反映培训项目的情况。本研究的目的是比较急诊中级技术人员临床技能培训的两种方法。
2017年对克尔曼的急诊医疗技术人员进行了这项准实验。对两组人员(每组30名中级技术人员)分别采用电子教学法和传统教学法教授操作和临床技能,如心肺复苏(CPR)、分诊、设备熟悉程度以及正确的患者转运方法。最后,使用IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 22.0版(纽约州阿蒙克:IBM公司)对人员对两种教学方法的满意度进行比较和分析。
在所有参与者中(分诊、肺部复苏、设备熟悉程度和患者转运),电子教学法和传统教学法的理论测试成绩没有显著差异。此外,除分诊外,在所有参与者中,电子教学法和传统教学法的实践测试成绩存在显著差异。在CPR、设备使用和转运方法的教学和课程难度这两个方面,学习者对电子教学法和传统教学法的满意度存在显著差异。
根据本研究获得的结果,由于电子教育系统具有包容性和交互性,建议在分诊等理论性更强的课程中使用。在CPR等需要更多实践和临床技能的实践课程教学中,建议采用传统教学法。