Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Center for Neuroprosthetics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Cortex. 2019 Aug;117:266-276. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
Previous single-site neurostimulation experiments have unsuccessfully attempted to shift decision-making away from habitual control, a fast, inflexible cognitive strategy, towards goal-directed control, a flexible, though computationally expensive strategy. We employed a dual-target neurostimulation approach in 30 healthy participants, using cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation (ccPAS) to target two key nodes: lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS), to test whether decision-making can be artificially shifted from habitual toward goal-directed control. Participants received three active stimulations, delivered at least six days apart (each involving 100 paired pulses over the IPS and LPFC, varying the interstimulus interval): two interventional, time-relevant ccPAS (10 msec interval) and one control, non-time-relevant ccPAS (100 msec interval). Following stimulation, participants completed a sequential learning task, measuring goal-directed/habitual control, and a working memory task. IPS→LPFC ccPAS (stimulating IPS, then LPFC with a 10 msec interval) shifted decision-making from habitual toward goal-directed control, compared to control ccPAS. There was no effect of LPFC→IPS ccPAS, nor an effect of any PAS condition on working memory. Previous studies have shown ccPAS effects outside the motor domain targeting prefrontal regions on response inhibition, attentional bias, and alpha asymmetry. The present study measures the behavioural effects of parietal-prefrontal PAS, focusing on a highly complex decision-making task and working memory. If confirmed in larger studies, this would be the first instance of neurostimulation successfully shifting decision-making from habitual to goal-directed control, putatively via inducing long-term potentiation between the IPS and LPFC. However, we found no effect in the other direction (LPFC→IPS ccPAS), and no effect on working memory overall. PAS is a relatively new neuromodulatory technique in the cognitive arsenal, and this study could help guide future approaches in healthy and disordered decision-making.
先前的单部位神经刺激实验未能成功地将决策从习惯控制(一种快速但不灵活的认知策略)转移到目标导向控制(一种灵活但计算成本较高的策略)。我们在 30 名健康参与者中采用了双靶点神经刺激方法,使用皮质-皮质联合刺激(ccPAS)来靶向两个关键节点:外侧前额叶皮层(LPFC)和顶内沟(IPS),以测试决策是否可以人为地从习惯控制转移到目标导向控制。参与者接受了三种主动刺激,至少相隔六天(每种刺激包括 IPS 和 LPFC 上的 100 个成对脉冲,刺激间隔不同):两种干预性、时间相关的 ccPAS(10 毫秒间隔)和一种对照、非时间相关的 ccPAS(100 毫秒间隔)。刺激后,参与者完成了一个序列学习任务,测量目标导向/习惯控制,以及一个工作记忆任务。与对照 ccPAS 相比,IPS→LPFC ccPAS(刺激 IPS 然后用 10 毫秒间隔刺激 LPFC)将决策从习惯控制转移到目标导向控制。LPFC→IPS ccPAS 没有效果,任何 PAS 条件对工作记忆都没有影响。先前的研究表明,针对前额叶区域的 ccPAS 效应不仅存在于运动领域,还存在于反应抑制、注意力偏向和 alpha 不对称等方面。本研究测量了顶叶-前额叶 PAS 的行为效应,重点是一项非常复杂的决策任务和工作记忆。如果在更大的研究中得到证实,这将是神经刺激首次成功地将决策从习惯控制转移到目标导向控制,推测是通过在 IPS 和 LPFC 之间诱导长时程增强。然而,我们在另一个方向(LPFC→IPS ccPAS)没有发现效果,总体上对工作记忆也没有影响。PAS 是认知武器库中的一种相对较新的神经调节技术,本研究可以帮助指导未来在健康和紊乱的决策中的方法。