Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍躁狂发作和混合发作患者全血细胞计数衍生炎症标志物的比较。

Comparison of the complete blood count-derived inflammatory markers in bipolar patients with manic and mixed episodes.

作者信息

Kirlioglu S S, Balcioglu Y H, Kalelioglu T, Erten E, Karamustafalioglu N

出版信息

Bratisl Lek Listy. 2019;120(3):195-199. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2019_051.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare altered inflammatory status between patients with bipolar manic and mixed episodes through neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) levels.

BACKGROUND

NLR, PLR, and MLR are systemic inflammation biomarkers that have recently studied in bipolar disorder (BD) manic and depressive episodes. Immunological biomarker signature of mixed episodes and MLR levels in BD have less been studied.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Our study included 48 bipolar patients in a mood episode (28 manic, 20 mixed) and 32 controls. Study-specific form including sociodemographic and clinical variables with laboratory findings were filled for all participants.

METHODS

Red cell distribution width (RDW), mean platelet volume (MPV) neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet count, NLR, PLR, and MLR were recorded.

RESULTS

PLR and MLR were found significantly higher in bipolar patients compared to controls while NLR and MLR were significantly higher in manic patients than in mixed patients. RDW was found higher in mixed episode compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

One can interpret these findings as MLR would be considered as a novel state biomarker for bipolar mood episodes and greater inflammatory activation may be involved in mania rather than mixed episode (Tab. 2, Fig. 1, Ref. 35).

摘要

目的

我们旨在通过中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)水平,比较双相躁狂发作和混合发作患者炎症状态的改变。

背景

NLR、PLR和MLR是全身炎症生物标志物,最近在双相情感障碍(BD)的躁狂和抑郁发作中进行了研究。BD中混合发作的免疫生物标志物特征和MLR水平的研究较少。

设计与背景

我们的研究纳入了48名处于情绪发作期的双相情感障碍患者(28名躁狂发作,20名混合发作)和32名对照者。为所有参与者填写了包括社会人口统计学和临床变量以及实验室检查结果的特定研究表格。

方法

记录红细胞分布宽度(RDW)、平均血小板体积(MPV)、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和血小板计数、NLR、PLR和MLR。

结果

与对照组相比,双相情感障碍患者的PLR和MLR显著更高,而躁狂发作患者的NLR和MLR显著高于混合发作患者。与对照组相比,混合发作患者的RDW更高。

结论

可以将这些发现解释为,MLR可被视为双相情感障碍情绪发作的一种新型状态生物标志物,且躁狂发作可能比混合发作涉及更大程度的炎症激活(表2,图1,参考文献35)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验