Suppr超能文献

心理治疗结果的纵向调查(LIPO):研究方案描述

Longitudinal Investigation of Psychotherapy Outcomes (LIPO): Description of the Study Protocol.

作者信息

Gonçalves Leonardo, Barbisan Guillherme Kirsten, Rebouças Cinthia Danielle Araújo Vasconcelos, da Rocha Neusa Sica

机构信息

Post-Graduation Program in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 8;10:212. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00212. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Despite extensive research in the field of psychotherapies, few studies have compared the primary psychotherapies of naturalistic design, which represents real-life situations. The objectives of this study were to evaluate three modalities of evidence-based psychotherapy for clinical, psychosocial, and biological outcomes and to identify the mediators and confounders of this process. Our primary hypothesis is that all psychotherapies will improve clinical and psychosocial outcomes and will increase BDNF levels. longitudinal, naturalistic. One hundred twenty-six patients who underwent one of three evidence-based modalities of individual psychotherapy [psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT), interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), and cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy (CBT)] were included. Primary outcomes are divided into three domains of variables: clinical (general psychiatric symptoms), biological (serum BDNF levels), and psychosocial (resilience, quality of life, coping strategies, social support, and quality of life-adjusted years of life). Confounding/mediator variables included clinical (personality traits, type of psychotherapy, number of sessions, concomitant use of pharmacological treatment, history of previous psychotherapeutic treatment, medical and psychiatric comorbidities, and psychiatric diagnosis), psychosocial (psychosocial stressors, therapeutic alliance, and defense mechanism style), and other (religiosity) factors. The follow-up period will be baseline and 6 months and 1 year after entering the study. The study will include 42 controls for biological variables only. Sample size calculation considered a significance level of 5% and a power of 80% to detect a difference of 0.22 with a standard deviation of 0.43, assuming losses of 20-30% of patients. The comparison between the modalities of psychotherapy will be by generalized estimating equations (GEE) model, the analysis of mediators by the Hayes method, and confounders by multivariate logistic regression. The findings of this study are intended to demonstrate the outcomes of evidence-based psychotherapies for clinical, psychosocial, and biological parameters and to understand the mediators and confounders of this process in a real-life setting for patients with severe mental illness, thus contributing to the establishment of evidence-based public health policies in the field of psychological interventions.

摘要

尽管心理治疗领域已有广泛研究,但很少有研究比较自然主义设计的主要心理治疗方法,而这种设计代表了现实生活情况。本研究的目的是评估三种循证心理治疗方式在临床、心理社会和生物学方面的疗效,并确定这一过程的中介因素和混杂因素。我们的主要假设是,所有心理治疗都将改善临床和心理社会疗效,并提高脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)水平。本研究为纵向、自然主义研究。纳入了126例接受三种循证个体心理治疗方式之一的患者[精神动力心理治疗(PDT)、人际心理治疗(IPT)和认知行为心理治疗(CBT)]。主要疗效分为三个变量领域:临床(一般精神症状)、生物学(血清BDNF水平)和心理社会(心理韧性、生活质量、应对策略、社会支持以及生活质量调整生命年)。混杂/中介变量包括临床(人格特质、心理治疗类型、治疗次数、药物治疗的同时使用、既往心理治疗史、医学和精神共病以及精神诊断)、心理社会(心理社会应激源、治疗联盟和防御机制风格)以及其他(宗教信仰)因素。随访期为基线期以及进入研究后的6个月和1年。该研究仅针对生物学变量纳入42例对照。样本量计算考虑了5%的显著性水平和80%的检验效能,以检测标准差为0.43时0.22的差异,假设患者流失率为20%-30%。心理治疗方式之间的比较将采用广义估计方程(GEE)模型,通过海斯方法分析中介因素,通过多变量逻辑回归分析混杂因素。本研究结果旨在展示循证心理治疗在临床、心理社会和生物学参数方面的疗效,并了解重度精神疾病患者在现实生活环境中这一过程的中介因素和混杂因素,从而有助于在心理干预领域制定循证公共卫生政策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验