• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们的健康,我们的研究。在多民族人群中确定儿童和青少年公共卫生研究重点:基于社区的参与式健康研究优先调查方案。

Our health, our research. Identifying public health research priorities among children and youth in a multiethnic population: protocol for a community-based participatory health research priority survey.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Quality and Research, Finnmark Hospital Trust, Alta, Norway.

Department of Health and Care Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway Faculty of Health Sciences, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 19;13(7):e072567. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072567.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072567
PMID:37474191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10357779/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Emphasis on public involvement (PI) in health research has increased in the last 20 years. However, there is limited literature on PI in planning and conducting population-based health research. This study aims to identify child and adolescent health research priorities among children and stakeholder groups in Northern Norway by inviting PI groups to collaborate with researchers to develop and conduct a research priority survey.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a community-based participatory research project. The methods for research prioritisation are informed by those developed by the James Lind Alliance. In addition, the survey design and engagement plans are developed in extensive collaboration with child and youth stakeholder groups. Nine PI groups have met three times to develop an anonymous child and youth health research priority survey, as well as strategies for recruitment and dissemination of results. All 5th-10th grade pupils in the Finnmark region will be invited to participate in the survey, as well as caretakers and adults working for and with children and youth. The survey results will be analysed in collaboration with the PI groups, and research priorities checked with existing research literature.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is registered and approved by the Data Protection Authorities at the Finnmark Hospital Trust and the Expert Committee for Sami Health Research. Descriptions of methods applied and the survey results will be published in popular and scientific publications.

摘要

简介

在过去的 20 年中,公众参与(PI)在健康研究中的重要性日益增加。然而,关于规划和开展基于人群的健康研究中的 PI 的文献有限。本研究旨在通过邀请 PI 小组与研究人员合作,制定并开展研究优先级调查,确定挪威北部儿童和利益相关者群体的儿童和青少年健康研究重点。

方法和分析

这是一个基于社区的参与式研究项目。研究优先级的方法是受詹姆斯林德联盟(James Lind Alliance)制定的方法启发。此外,调查设计和参与计划是在与儿童和青年利益相关者团体的广泛合作中制定的。九个 PI 小组已经举行了三次会议,制定了一个匿名的儿童和青年健康研究重点调查,以及招募和传播结果的策略。邀请芬马克地区所有 5 至 10 年级的学生、看护人和为儿童和青年工作或与他们一起工作的成年人参加调查。将与 PI 小组合作分析调查结果,并将研究重点与现有研究文献进行核对。

伦理和传播

该研究已在芬马克医院信托基金和萨米健康研究专家委员会的数据保护局注册和批准。所应用方法的描述和调查结果将在通俗和科学出版物中发表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5964/10357779/c666f9065026/bmjopen-2023-072567f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5964/10357779/c666f9065026/bmjopen-2023-072567f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5964/10357779/c666f9065026/bmjopen-2023-072567f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Our health, our research. Identifying public health research priorities among children and youth in a multiethnic population: protocol for a community-based participatory health research priority survey.我们的健康,我们的研究。在多民族人群中确定儿童和青少年公共卫生研究重点:基于社区的参与式健康研究优先调查方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 19;13(7):e072567. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072567.
2
Study Protocol: Determining Research Priorities of Young Albertan Families (The Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting Project-FRAISE)-Participatory Action Research.研究方案:确定艾伯塔省年轻家庭的研究重点(家庭研究议程倡议设定项目 - FRAISE) - 参与式行动研究
Front Public Health. 2018 Aug 28;6:228. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00228. eCollection 2018.
3
What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership: the PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) study.在临床试验中,哪些是最重要的未解决的研究问题?一项詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系:PRioRiTy II(随机试验中优先考虑保留率)研究。
Trials. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3687-7.
4
Top 10 (plus 1) research priorities for expectant families and those with children to age 24 months in Alberta, Canada: results from the Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting (FRAISE) priority setting partnership project.加拿大艾伯塔省期待生育家庭和 24 个月以下儿童的十大(加一)研究重点:来自家庭研究议程倡议设定(FRAISE)优先事项设定伙伴关系项目的结果。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 9;11(12):e047919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047919.
5
Identifying Priorities for Physiotherapy Research in the UK: the James Lind Alliance Physiotherapy Priority Setting Partnership.确定英国物理治疗研究重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟物理治疗重点制定伙伴关系。
Physiotherapy. 2020 Jun;107:161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature.患者和公众参与优先事项设定:文献系统快速综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 2;13(3):e0193579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193579. eCollection 2018.
7
Using a participatory action research approach to explore, understand and evaluate well-being among children living in socially deprived areas in Southern Sweden: a study protocol.采用参与式行动研究方法探索、理解和评估瑞典南部社会贫困地区儿童的幸福感:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 3;14(8):e086406. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086406.
8
Identifying and prioritising unanswered research questions for people with hyperacusis: James Lind Alliance Hyperacusis Priority Setting Partnership.确定和优先考虑患有听觉过敏症人群的未解决研究问题:詹姆斯林德联盟听觉过敏优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032178.
9
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
10
Participatory research: a Priority Setting Partnership for chronic musculoskeletal pain in Denmark.参与式研究:丹麦慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
Scand J Pain. 2022 Aug 2;23(2):402-415. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2022-0019. Print 2023 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review.利用共同生产、共同设计和共同创作来调动健康状况管理中的知识:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):877. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y.
2
Changes in life expectancy and disease burden in Norway, 1990-2019: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.挪威 1990-2019 年预期寿命和疾病负担变化:2019 年全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Jul;7(7):e593-e605. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00092-5.
3
Patients participating as co-researchers in health research: A systematic review of outcomes and experiences.
作为共同研究者参与健康研究的患者:结局与体验的系统评价
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Aug;48(6):617-628. doi: 10.1177/1403494819863514. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
4
Facilitating non-tokenistic user involvement in research.促进用户非形式化地参与研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jun 4;5:18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0153-3. eCollection 2019.
5
Public Involvement in Global Genomics Research: A Scoping Review.公众参与全球基因组学研究:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2019 Apr 9;7:79. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00079. eCollection 2019.
6
Service user's actual involvement in mental health research practices: A scoping review.服务使用者实际参与精神健康研究实践:范围综述。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Aug;28(4):798-815. doi: 10.1111/inm.12594. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
7
Co-production with "vulnerable" groups: Balancing protection and participation.与“弱势群体”共同生产:平衡保护与参与。
Health Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 6;1(3):e19. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.19. eCollection 2018 Mar.
8
Involving patients and the public in medical and health care research studies: An exploratory survey on participant recruiting and representativeness from the perspective of study authors.参与医疗保健研究:从研究作者的角度出发,对参与者招募和代表性的探索性调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0204187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204187. eCollection 2019.
9
Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.患者和公众参与对临床试验入组和保留的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4738.
10
Geographic health inequalities in Norway: a Gini analysis of cross-county differences in mortality from 1980 to 2014.挪威的地理健康不平等:1980 年至 2014 年县际死亡率差异的基尼分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 24;17(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0771-7.