• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

涉及年轻人的心理健康项目中的患者及公众参与(PPI)和负责任研究与创新(RRI)方法:一项范围综述方案

Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) approaches in mental health projects involving young people: a scoping review protocol.

作者信息

de Alcântara Mendes Josimar Antônio, Lucassen Mathijs, Adams Alex, Martin Lucy, Aicardi Christine, Woodcock Rebecca, Nielsen Emma, Townsend Ellen, Jirotka Marina

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, 39a St. Giles, Oxford, OX1 3LW, UK.

City, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 11;10(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00591-1.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-024-00591-1
PMID:38863035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11167781/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rather than being perceived as merely 'part of the problem', the perspectives and experiences of young people play a pivotal role in devising effective solutions for mental health challenges. Two distinct methodologies that aid in this endeavour are 'patient and public involvement' (PPI) and 'responsible research and innovation' (RRI). However, there is a tendency to conflate PPI and RRI practices, leading to ambiguity in their application. Moreover, the extent and nature of young people's involvement in mental health-related projects (namely: research, intervention, product development) employing these methodologies, and the subsequent implications thereof, remain unclear. Consequently, the proposed scoping review aims to identify and analyse literature pertaining to PPI and RRI approaches in mental health projects that engage young people in collaboration.

METHODS

The selected databases will be MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, Scopus, Web of Science, IBBS, CINAHL (EBSCO) and ASSIA. Comprehensive searches will span from the inception of each database. A pilot test will be conducted to assess the screening criteria and data extraction form, with two authors independently reviewing titles and abstracts. Full-text articles meeting the inclusion criteria will undergo narrative syntheses, with results presented in tabular format. Feedback on the findings from a youth perspective will be sought from young people within our broader research network, namely Sprouting Minds. The review will adhere to the guidelines outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and follow the PRISMA-ScR procedures. Inclusion criteria will comprise English-language, primary research peer-reviewed articles focused on Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) or Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), examining mental health-related research processes, interventions, and products developed in collaboration with young people. Studies employing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods approaches will be considered, while non-journal publications will be excluded.

DISCUSSION

The intended scoping review aims to map the literature concerning mental health-related projects that engage with young people through PPI or RRI approaches. The outcomes hold promise for enriching the participatory research domain, particularly in studies centred on young people and their mental well-being. Furthermore, by delineating potential overlaps and distinctions between PPI and RRI, the findings stand to aid mental health researchers and practitioners in making informed decisions about the most suitable approach for their projects when partnering with young individuals.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework (registration: DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/N4EDB ).

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c2c/11167781/619b6e06f5a6/40900_2024_591_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c2c/11167781/619b6e06f5a6/40900_2024_591_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c2c/11167781/619b6e06f5a6/40900_2024_591_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

年轻人的观点和经历并非仅仅被视为“问题的一部分”,而是在为心理健康挑战设计有效解决方案中发挥着关键作用。有助于这一努力的两种不同方法是“患者及公众参与”(PPI)和“负责任的研究与创新”(RRI)。然而,存在将PPI和RRI实践混为一谈的趋势,导致其应用中存在模糊性。此外,年轻人参与采用这些方法的心理健康相关项目(即研究、干预、产品开发)的程度和性质,以及由此产生的影响仍不明确。因此,拟进行的范围综述旨在识别和分析与通过合作让年轻人参与的心理健康项目中的PPI和RRI方法相关的文献。

方法

选定的数据库将包括MEDLINE、PsycINFO、PsycArticles、Scopus、Web of Science、IBBS、CINAHL(EBSCO)和ASSIA。全面检索将涵盖每个数据库的创建之初。将进行预试验以评估筛选标准和数据提取表,由两位作者独立审查标题和摘要。符合纳入标准的全文文章将进行叙述性综合分析,结果以表格形式呈现。将从我们更广泛的研究网络“萌芽心灵”中的年轻人那里寻求从青年视角对研究结果的反馈。该综述将遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)概述的指南并遵循PRISMA-ScR程序。纳入标准将包括以英语撰写的、经同行评审的初级研究文章,重点关注患者及公众参与(PPI)或负责任的研究与创新(RRI),研究与年轻人合作开展的心理健康相关研究过程、干预措施和产品。将考虑采用定量、定性和混合方法的研究,同时排除非期刊出版物。

讨论

拟进行的范围综述旨在梳理与通过PPI或RRI方法让年轻人参与的心理健康相关项目的文献。研究结果有望丰富参与式研究领域,特别是在以年轻人及其心理健康为中心的研究中。此外,通过描绘PPI和RRI之间潜在的重叠和区别,研究结果有助于心理健康研究人员和从业者在与年轻人合作开展项目时,就最适合其项目的方法做出明智决策。

系统综述注册

开放科学框架(注册:DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/N4EDB )

相似文献

1
Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) approaches in mental health projects involving young people: a scoping review protocol.涉及年轻人的心理健康项目中的患者及公众参与(PPI)和负责任研究与创新(RRI)方法:一项范围综述方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 11;10(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00591-1.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Synthesising the evidence for patient and public involvement in pressure ulcer research: A scoping review protocol.综合患者及公众参与压疮研究的证据:一项范围综述方案。
J Tissue Viability. 2025 May;34(2):100892. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100892. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
6
Involvement of Indigenous young people in the design and evaluation of digital mental health interventions: a scoping review protocol.原住民年轻人参与数字心理健康干预措施的设计与评估:一项范围综述方案
Syst Rev. 2021 May 5;10(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01685-7.
7
Effective approaches to public involvement in care home research: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.公众参与养老院研究的有效方法:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 2;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00453-2.
8
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in preclinical research: A scoping review protocol.患者及公众参与临床前研究:一项范围综述方案
HRB Open Res. 2021 Aug 31;4:61. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13303.2. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding adolescent girls' thoughts and opinions on having social media influencers deliver body image and mental health support: A mixed-methods study.了解青少年女孩对社交媒体有影响力的人提供身体形象和心理健康支持的想法和观点:一项混合方法研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 3;11:20552076251361340. doi: 10.1177/20552076251361340. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
A collective autoethnography of coproduction in mental health research by academic researchers and young people in Brazil.巴西的学术研究人员和年轻人共同进行的精神健康研究中的共同创作的民族志。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov;8(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012443.
2
Patient and Public Involvement in Youth Mental Health Research: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Practices and Impact.患者及公众参与青少年心理健康研究:实践与影响的系统评价方案
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 5;12:703624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703624. eCollection 2021.
3
Digital video interventions and mental health literacy among young people: a scoping review.
数字视频干预措施与年轻人心理健康素养:范围综述。
J Ment Health. 2022 Dec;31(6):873-883. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1922642. Epub 2021 May 19.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
5
Preventive digital mental health interventions for children and young people: a review of the design and reporting of research.针对儿童和青少年的预防性数字心理健康干预措施:研究设计与报告综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Oct 15;3:133. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00339-7. eCollection 2020.
6
Exploring patient and public involvement (PPI) and co-production approaches in mental health research: learning from the PARTNERS2 research programme.探索精神卫生研究中的患者及公众参与(PPI)和共同生产方法:借鉴PARTNERS2研究项目的经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Sep 21;6:56. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00224-3. eCollection 2020.
7
Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production.迷失在阴影中:关于共同生产阴暗面的思考
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 7;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00558-0.
8
The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?共同生产的阴暗面:对于健康研究来说,其成本是否超过了收益?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 28;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.
9
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
10
The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement.参与式时代精神:医疗保健改善中共同生产和共同设计时代变革的一种解释性理论模型。
Med Humanit. 2019 Sep;45(3):247-257. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011398. Epub 2018 Jun 28.