• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分娩胎盘:女性的决策与体验。

Birthing the placenta: women's decisions and experiences.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore DC, Qld, 4558, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Apr 27;19(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2288-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-019-2288-5
PMID:31029115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6487060/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research examining the birth of the placenta has focussed on quantitative outcomes comparing active and expectant (physiological) management. However, it is also important to understand women's experiences of birthing the placenta.

METHODS

The participant group consisted of 11 women who had expectant management, eight who had active management and one who was unsure. Participants were interviewed in-depth and the data analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Seven themes were identified in the data relating to before, during and after the birth of the placenta. Before birth themes focused on making decisions and included 'doing the research' and 'natural birth'. During the birth of the placenta themes were 'boundaries of time', 'focusing on baby' and 'sensations'. After the birth themes consisted of 'looking' and 'keeping'.

CONCLUSION

Most of the women considered a physiological birth of the placenta to be an intrinsic element of natural birth. Active management was considered to be an intervention used if complications occurred. In contrast, women who chose active management did not consider the placenta to be an important element of natural birth, and chose active management in order to prevent complications. Decisions about birthing the placenta were informed by Internet sources and previous personal experiences rather than care providers. During the birth of the placenta care providers managed the boundaries of time whilst women focused on their baby. The sensations women described were consistent across both types of management. Women valued seeing their placenta and having the opportunity to keep it, and placenta encapsulation was popular. The findings of this study contribute the experiences of women to the body of knowledge informing practice during the birth of the placenta.

摘要

背景

既往研究多聚焦于对比活跃管理和期待管理(生理性管理)的胎盘娩出的量化结局,而理解产妇娩出胎盘的体验也同样重要。

方法

研究纳入 11 名接受期待管理、8 名接受活跃管理和 1 名不确定管理的产妇。对所有产妇进行深入访谈,采用主题分析法对资料进行分析。

结果

本研究共识别出 7 个主题,涉及胎盘娩出前、娩出中和娩出后的相关体验。胎盘娩出前的主题主要为决策制定,包括“做研究”和“自然分娩”;胎盘娩出期间的主题为“时间界限”“关注宝宝”和“感觉”;胎盘娩出后的主题为“观察”和“保留”。

结论

大多数产妇认为生理性胎盘娩出是自然分娩的固有组成部分。如果发生并发症,则会采取积极的管理措施。相比之下,选择积极管理的产妇不认为胎盘是自然分娩的重要组成部分,而是为了预防并发症而选择积极管理。关于胎盘娩出的决策受网络资源和个人既往经验的影响,而非医护人员。在胎盘娩出过程中,医护人员管理时间界限,而产妇专注于自己的宝宝。两种管理方式下,产妇描述的感觉是一致的。产妇非常重视观察胎盘并保留胎盘,胎盘封存技术也广受欢迎。本研究的结果丰富了产妇胎盘娩出体验的相关知识,为胎盘娩出的实践提供了依据。

相似文献

1
Birthing the placenta: women's decisions and experiences.分娩胎盘:女性的决策与体验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Apr 27;19(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2288-5.
2
Women's decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan: a qualitative study.台湾地区剖宫产后再次分娩时产妇决策过程及其影响因素的定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 17;18(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1661-0.
3
Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study.为什么一些英国女性选择在家中无医护人员协助分娩?一项诠释现象学研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Mar 21;16:59. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0847-6.
4
Women's experiences of their involvement around care decisions during a subsequent pregnancy after a previous caesarean birth in Western Australia.澳大利亚西部女性在前次剖宫产术后再次妊娠时对其参与照护决策的体验。
Women Birth. 2021 Sep;34(5):e442-e450. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Sources, responses and moderators of childbirth fear in Australian women: a qualitative investigation.澳大利亚女性分娩恐惧的来源、反应及调节因素:一项定性研究
Midwifery. 2015 Jan;31(1):239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
Women's motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis.荷兰女性违背医疗建议选择高危分娩环境的动机:定性分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 16;17(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1621-0.
7
Birthing outside the system: perceptions of risk amongst Australian women who have freebirths and high risk homebirths.在系统之外分娩:澳大利亚自由分娩和高风险居家分娩女性对风险的看法。
Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.11.002. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
8
The influence of childbirth expectations on Western Australian women's perceptions of their birth experience.分娩期望对西澳大利亚州女性分娩经历认知的影响。
Midwifery. 2007 Sep;23(3):235-47. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.02.002. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
9
Factors associated with women's birth beliefs and experiences of decision-making in the context of planned birth: A survey study.与计划分娩背景下妇女分娩信念和决策经验相关的因素:一项调查研究。
Midwifery. 2021 May;96:102944. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102944. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
10
The novice birthing: theorising first-time mothers' experiences of birth at home and in hospital in Australia.新手分娩:理论化澳大利亚初产妇在家和在医院分娩的体验。
Midwifery. 2010 Feb;26(1):53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.01.012. Epub 2008 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of context-specific components of obstetric violence: Experiences from the central zone of Tanzania.产科暴力特定情境因素的开发与验证:来自坦桑尼亚中部地区的经验
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0326362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326362. eCollection 2025.
2
Online scientific research on placentophagy: a bibliometric analysis.胎盘食入的在线科学研究:文献计量分析。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Mar 15;46. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024AR04. eCollection 2024.
3
The Disposal of Placenta among Indigenous Groups Globally: An Integrative Literature Review.全球原住民群体的胎盘处置:一项综合文献综述
Int J Reprod Med. 2023 Oct 26;2023:6676809. doi: 10.1155/2023/6676809. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour.分娩第三阶段女性的积极管理与期待管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 13;2(2):CD007412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007412.pub5.
2
Women's psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: a meta-synthesis.女性生理性分娩的心理体验:一项元整合研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 18;8(10):e020347. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020347.
3
Physiologic childbirth and active management of the third stage of labor: A latent class model of risk for postpartum hemorrhage.生理分娩和第三产程积极管理:产后出血风险的潜在类别模型。
Birth. 2019 Mar;46(1):69-79. doi: 10.1111/birt.12384. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
4
Does maternity care decision-making conform to shared decision- making standards for repeat cesarean and labor induction after suspected macrosomia?对于疑似巨大儿的再次剖宫产和引产,产科护理决策是否符合共同决策标准?
Birth. 2018 Sep;45(3):236-244. doi: 10.1111/birt.12365. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
5
What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review.分娩期间对女性重要的事项:系统定性综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 17;13(4):e0194906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194906. eCollection 2018.
6
Refusal of recommended maternity care: Time to make a pact with women?拒绝推荐的孕产妇保健服务:是时候与妇女达成协议了?
Women Birth. 2018 Dec;31(6):433-441. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
The Mothers on Respect (MOR) index: measuring quality, safety, and human rights in childbirth.尊重母亲指数(MOR):衡量分娩中的质量、安全和人权
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Jan 19;3:201-210. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.01.005. eCollection 2017 Dec.
8
How do informal information sources influence women's decision-making for birth? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.非正规信息来源如何影响女性的分娩决策?定性研究的元分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1648-2.
9
Informed consent and refusal in obstetrics: A practical ethical guide.产科中的知情同意与拒绝:实用伦理指南。
Birth. 2017 Sep;44(3):195-199. doi: 10.1111/birt.12281. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
10
Women's descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions.女性对与医护人员行为及互动相关的分娩创伤的描述。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 10;17(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1197-0.