• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波士顿诊断性失语症检查第三版的因子结构。

The Factor Structure of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, Third Edition.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Aug;25(7):772-776. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719000237.

DOI:10.1017/S1355617719000237
PMID:31030708
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) is one of the most commonly used aphasia batteries. The newest edition has undergone significant revisions since its original publication in 1972, but existing evidence for its validity is lacking. We examined the construct validity of BDAE-3 and identified the factor structure of this battery.

METHOD

A total of 355 people with aphasia of various types and severity completed neuropsychological evaluations to assess their patterns of language impairment. A principal component analysis with varimax rotation was conducted to examine the components of BDAE-3 subtests.

RESULTS

Five components accounting for over 70% of the BDAE-3 total variance were found. The five language factors identified were auditory comprehension/ideomotor praxis, naming and reading, articulation-repetition, grammatical comprehension, and phonological processing.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the BDAE-3 demonstrates good construct validity, and certain language functions remain primary, distinct language domains (i.e., receptive vs. expressive language) across severities of aphasia. Overall, our findings inform clinical practice by outlining the inherent structure of language abilities in people with aphasia. Clinicians can utilize the findings to select core BDAE-3 tests that are most representative of their respective functions, thereby reducing the total testing time while preserving diagnostic sensitivity. (JINS, 2019, 25, 772-776).

摘要

目的

波士顿诊断性失语症检查(BDAE)是最常用的失语症检查之一。自 1972 年首次出版以来,其最新版本经历了重大修订,但缺乏其有效性的现有证据。我们检验了 BDAE-3 的构念效度,并确定了该检查的因子结构。

方法

共有 355 名不同类型和严重程度的失语症患者完成了神经心理学评估,以评估他们的语言障碍模式。采用主轴因子分析和方差极大旋转进行检验,以检验 BDAE-3 测验的组成部分。

结果

发现了五个占 BDAE-3 总方差超过 70%的成分。确定的五个语言因子分别为听觉理解/意念运动操作、命名和阅读、发音重复、语法理解和语音处理。

结论

我们的结果表明,BDAE-3 具有良好的构念效度,并且某些语言功能在不同严重程度的失语症中仍然是主要的、独特的语言领域(即接受性语言与表达性语言)。总的来说,我们的发现通过概述失语症患者语言能力的内在结构为临床实践提供了信息。临床医生可以利用这些发现选择最能代表其各自功能的核心 BDAE-3 测试,从而在保持诊断敏感性的同时减少总测试时间。(JINS,2019,25,772-776)。

相似文献

1
The Factor Structure of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, Third Edition.波士顿诊断性失语症检查第三版的因子结构。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Aug;25(7):772-776. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719000237.
2
The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination-Spanish version: the influence of demographic variables.《波士顿失语症诊断检查-西班牙语版:人口统计学变量的影响》
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000 Nov;6(7):802-14. doi: 10.1017/s135561770067707x.
3
A comparison of the BAT and BDAE-SF batteries in determining the linguistic ability in Greek-speaking patients with Broca's aphasia.比较BAT和BDAE-SF电池在评估说希腊语的布罗卡失语症患者语言能力方面的作用。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Jun;25(6-7):464-79. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.560991. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
4
Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Serbian Aphasia Screening Test.塞尔维亚失语症筛查测试的信度和效度评估。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304565. eCollection 2024.
5
The Russian Aphasia Test: The first comprehensive, quantitative, standardized, and computerized aphasia language battery in Russian.俄罗斯失语症测试:俄罗斯第一个全面、定量、标准化和计算机化的失语症语言电池。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0258946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258946. eCollection 2021.
6
Subcortical aphasia: three different language disorder syndromes?皮质下失语症:三种不同的语言障碍综合征?
Eur J Neurol. 2003 Jul;10(4):445-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00604.x.
7
Assessing acquired language disorders in adults via the Internet.通过互联网评估成人后天性语言障碍。
Telemed J E Health. 2008 Aug;14(6):552-9. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0091.
8
The role of commonality, distinctiveness and importance of semantic features in persons with aphasia.
Brain Inj. 2013;27(4):399-407. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.750748. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
9
[Variability of the Boston test for the diagnosis of aphasia in active working adults].[波士顿测试在在职成年人失语症诊断中的变异性]
Rev Neurol. 1998 Jun;26(154):962-70.
10
Defining aphasia: Content analysis of six aphasia diagnostic batteries.定义失语症:六种失语症诊断工具的内容分析。
Cortex. 2023 Sep;166:19-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The mini-Oxford cognitive screen (Mini-OCS): A very brief cognitive screen for use in chronic stroke.迷你牛津认知筛查量表(Mini-OCS):一种用于慢性卒中的非常简短的认知筛查工具。
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Jul 27:23969873251358811. doi: 10.1177/23969873251358811.
2
Characteristics and prognosis of language impairment in subcortical aphasia of acute stroke patients.急性脑卒中患者皮质下失语症语言障碍的特征与预后
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1630365. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1630365. eCollection 2025.
3
Impact of motor symptom asymmetry on non-motor outcomes in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.
帕金森病中运动症状不对称对非运动结局的影响:一项系统综述
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2025 Jul 1;11(1):188. doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-01046-4.
4
Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review.失语症评估工具的质量:一项系统综述。
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):271. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030271.
5
Machine learning-based feature selection and classification for cerebral infarction screening: an experimental study.基于机器学习的脑梗死筛查特征选择与分类:一项实验研究
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Feb 21;11:e2704. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2704. eCollection 2025.
6
Automated Speech Analysis in Bipolar Disorder: The CALIBER Study Protocol and Preliminary Results.双相情感障碍中的自动语音分析:CALIBER研究方案及初步结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 23;13(17):4997. doi: 10.3390/jcm13174997.
7
Intraindividual variability in post-stroke cognition and its relationship with activities of daily living and social functioning: an ecological momentary assessment approach.中风后认知的个体内变异性及其与日常生活活动和社会功能的关系:一种生态瞬时评估方法。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2024 Sep;31(6):564-575. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2024.2307203. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
8
Effect of Acupuncture vs Sham Acupuncture on Patients With Poststroke Motor Aphasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针刺与假针刺治疗中风后运动性失语症患者的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2352580. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52580.
9
Melodic intonation therapy for non-fluent aphasia after stroke: A clinical pilot study on behavioral and DTI findings.旋律语调疗法治疗中风后非流畅性失语:一项关于行为和弥散张量成像结果的临床初步研究。
iScience. 2023 Aug 23;26(9):107453. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107453. eCollection 2023 Sep 15.
10
Neuropsychological Assessment in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comprehensive Review with Clinical Recommendations.创伤性脑损伤患者的神经心理学评估:综合综述及临床建议
Biomedicines. 2023 Jul 14;11(7):1991. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11071991.