Schonfeld Toby
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2019;9(1):41-45. doi: 10.1353/nib.2019.0016.
Citizen science, a diverse enterprise involving multiple processes, participants, and projects, challenges conventional approaches to thinking about science and the issues it raises. This commentary explores three key themes identified in the accompanying narratives. (1) Motivated volunteers may serve as novel resources for science, allowing projects to proceed in ways that are cheaper and more accessible than previously considered. (2) Traditional scientific approaches may be insufficient to even identify research questions, much less attempt to address issues. Citizen science may fill that gap. (3) Ethical concepts may have unique applications in this burgeoning field, both due to the emergence of novel ethical issues and to new categories of people, places, and things inherent in the conduct of citizen science. The commentary closes with suggestions for moving forward as citizen science becomes the norm rather than the exception.
公民科学是一项涉及多个过程、参与者和项目的多样化事业,它对思考科学及其引发的问题的传统方式提出了挑战。本评论探讨了随附叙述中确定的三个关键主题。(1)有积极性的志愿者可能成为科学的新型资源,使项目能够以比以前认为的更便宜、更容易获得的方式进行。(2)传统科学方法甚至可能不足以确定研究问题,更不用说试图解决问题了。公民科学可能会填补这一空白。(3)伦理概念在这个新兴领域可能有独特的应用,这既是由于新的伦理问题的出现,也是由于公民科学实践中固有的新的人群、地点和事物类别。评论最后提出了一些建议,以便在公民科学成为常态而非例外的情况下继续前进。