Elliott Kevin C
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2019;9(1):47-52. doi: 10.1353/nib.2019.0017.
The narratives in this issue suggest six themes that merit further exploration: (1) the complexity of citizen science as a concept; (2) the potential to incorporate insights from the literature on team science; (3) the role of power and privilege in citizen science; (4) tensions over standardization, regulation, and quality control; (5) the nature and importance of local knowledge; and (6) the role of funding sources in citizen science initiatives. Taken together, these narratives and themes provide an image of citizen science that is like a kaleidoscope. They portray citizen science as a jumble of different kinds of activities that are in a constant state of flux. One of the most important tasks for the citizen science community going forward is to find ways to harness this energy and innovation while providing appropriate guidelines and standards.
(1)公民科学作为一个概念的复杂性;(2)纳入团队科学文献见解的潜力;(3)权力和特权在公民科学中的作用;(4)标准化、监管和质量控制方面的紧张关系;(5)地方知识的性质和重要性;(6)资金来源在公民科学倡议中的作用。总体而言,这些叙述和主题描绘出一幅类似万花筒的公民科学图景。它们将公民科学描绘成一堆不断变化的不同类型活动的杂乱组合。公民科学社群未来最重要的任务之一,就是要找到方法来利用这种活力和创新,同时提供适当的指导方针和标准。