• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项最佳-最差标度实验对公民科学中的伦理问题进行了优先排序,揭示了人们对数据层面问题的关注存在异质性。

A best-worst scaling experiment to prioritize concern about ethical issues in citizen science reveals heterogeneity on people-level v. data-level issues.

机构信息

Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 220N Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Drive, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 27;11(1):19119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96743-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-96743-4
PMID:34580327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8476613/
Abstract

"Citizen science" refers to the participation of lay individuals in scientific studies and other activities having scientific objectives. Citizen science gives rise to unique ethical issues that stem from the potentially multifaceted contributions of citizen scientists to the research process. We sought to explore the ethical issues that are most concerning to citizen scientist practitioners, participants, and scholars to support ethical practices in citizen science. We developed a best-worst scaling experiment using a balanced incomplete block design and fielded it with respondents recruited through the U.S.-based Citizen Science Association. Respondents were shown repeated subsets of 11 ethical issues and identified the most and least concerning issues in each subset. Latent class analysis revealed two respondent classes. The "Power to the People" class was most concerned about power imbalance between project leaders and participants, exploitation of participants, and lack of diverse participation. The "Show Me the Data" class was most concerned about the quality of data generated by citizen science projects and failure of projects to share data and other research outputs.

摘要

“公民科学”是指业余人士参与具有科学目标的科学研究和其他活动。公民科学引发了独特的伦理问题,这些问题源于公民科学家对研究过程的潜在多方面贡献。我们试图探讨公民科学实践者、参与者和学者最关心的伦理问题,以支持公民科学的伦理实践。我们使用平衡不完全区块设计开发了一个最佳最差标度实验,并通过美国公民科学协会招募的受访者进行了实地测试。受访者被展示了 11 个伦理问题的重复子集,并在每个子集中确定了最关心和最不关心的问题。潜在类别分析显示出两个受访者类别。“人民的力量”类最关心项目领导人和参与者之间的权力不平衡、参与者的剥削以及缺乏多样性参与。“给我看看数据”类最关心公民科学项目生成的数据质量以及项目未能共享数据和其他研究成果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc85/8476613/86343b0d4d18/41598_2021_96743_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc85/8476613/86343b0d4d18/41598_2021_96743_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc85/8476613/86343b0d4d18/41598_2021_96743_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A best-worst scaling experiment to prioritize concern about ethical issues in citizen science reveals heterogeneity on people-level v. data-level issues.一项最佳-最差标度实验对公民科学中的伦理问题进行了优先排序,揭示了人们对数据层面问题的关注存在异质性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 27;11(1):19119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96743-4.
2
The Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research.公民科学在健康和生物医学研究中的兴起。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Aug;19(8):3-14. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619859.
3
Finding Common Ground and Advancing Engagement in Citizen Science.寻找公民科学的共同点并推动参与度
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2019;9(1):41-45. doi: 10.1353/nib.2019.0016.
4
Ethics framework for citizen science and public and patient participation in research.公民科学和公众及患者参与研究的伦理框架。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 13;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00761-4.
5
Donors, authors, and owners: how is genomic citizen science addressing interests in research outputs?捐赠者、作者和所有者:基因组公民科学如何解决对研究成果的利益诉求?
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Nov 21;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0419-1.
6
How Biomedical Citizen Scientists Define What They Do: It's All in the Name.生物医学公民科学家如何定义自己的工作:全在名称中。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):63-70. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1825139. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
7
Citizen Science and Gamification.公民科学与游戏化。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 Mar;49(2):40-46. doi: 10.1002/hast.992.
8
Citizen Science Ethics: It's a Community Thing.公民科学伦理:这是一个社区事务。
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2019;9(1):35-40. doi: 10.1353/nib.2019.0015.
9
An Ethics Framework for Evaluating Ownership Practices in Biomedical Citizen Science.评估生物医学公民科学中所有权实践的伦理框架。
Citiz Sci. 2022;7(1). doi: 10.5334/cstp.537. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
10
Prioritization of ethical concerns regarding HIV molecular epidemiology by public health practitioners and researchers.公共卫生从业者和研究人员对 HIV 分子流行病学相关伦理问题的优先排序。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 29;24(1):1436. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18881-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Privacy in perspective: research participants' priorities and concerns related to sharing data generated in human neuroscience studies.透视隐私:研究参与者对于人类神经科学研究中产生的数据共享的优先事项和担忧。
Neuroethics. 2025 Aug;18(2). doi: 10.1007/s12152-025-09609-1. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
2
Diverse sources of normativity in open science and their implications for ethical governance.开放科学中规范性的多样来源及其对伦理治理的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jul 24;11(7):240480. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240480. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Prioritization of ethical concerns regarding HIV molecular epidemiology by public health practitioners and researchers.

本文引用的文献

1
Core values of genomic citizen science: results from a qualitative interview study.基因组公民科学的核心价值观:一项定性访谈研究的结果
Biosocieties. 2022 Jun;17(2):203-228. doi: 10.1057/s41292-020-00208-2. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
When Citizens Do Science.当公民从事科学活动时。
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2019;9(1):33-34. doi: 10.1353/nib.2019.0014.
3
Citizen science, public policy.公民科学,公共政策。
公共卫生从业者和研究人员对 HIV 分子流行病学相关伦理问题的优先排序。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 29;24(1):1436. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18881-4.
4
Assessing patient information needs for new antidiabetic medications to inform shared decision-making: A best-worst scaling experiment in China.评估患者对新型抗糖尿病药物的信息需求,以促进共同决策:在中国开展的最佳最差标度实验。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14059. doi: 10.1111/hex.14059.
5
Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study.应对新冠病毒疫情期间生物安全问题的自制科学:一项人种志与访谈研究
Biosocieties. 2023 Mar 28:1-22. doi: 10.1057/s41292-023-00301-2.
6
Designing Equitable, Transparent Community-Engaged Disaster Research.设计公平、透明的社区参与式灾害研究。
Citiz Sci. 2022;7(1). doi: 10.5334/cstp.443. Epub 2022 May 19.
Science. 2018 Jul 13;361(6398):134-136. doi: 10.1126/science.aar8379.
4
Identifying and prioritizing concerns associated with prosthetic devices for use in a benefit-risk assessment: a mixed-methods approach.确定和优先考虑与用于效益风险评估的假体设备相关的问题:一种混合方法。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 May;15(5):385-398. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1470505. Epub 2018 May 8.
5
From Crowdsourcing to Extreme Citizen Science: Participatory Research for Environmental Health.从众包到极限公民科学:参与式环境健康研究。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:335-350. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013702.
6
Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?提高健康领域离散选择实验的质量:我们如何评估有效性和可靠性?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Dec;17(6):531-542. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1389648. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
7
Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health Care.运用最佳-最差标度法研究医疗保健偏好。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Dec;34(12):1195-1209. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0429-5.
8
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.离散选择实验分析的统计方法:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会联合分析良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives.公民科学还是科学公民身份?厘清国家研究计划中公众参与言辞的用途。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jun 4;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1.
10
Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.使用最佳-最差标度法对健康与医疗保健偏好的实验测量:综述
Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x. Epub 2016 Jan 8.