Coppalle Sullivan, Rave Guillaume, Ben Abderrahman Abderraouf, Ali Ajmol, Salhi Iyed, Zouita Sghaier, Zouita Amira, Brughelli Matt, Granacher Urs, Zouhal Hassane
M2S (Movement, Sport and Health Sciences Laboratory), University of Rennes 2, Rennes, France.
Stade Lavallois Mayenne Football Club, Laval, France.
Front Physiol. 2019 Apr 12;10:409. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00409. eCollection 2019.
There is controversy in the literature in regards of the link between training load and injury rate. Thus, the aims of this non-interventional study were to evaluate relationships between pre-season training load with biochemical markers, injury incidence and performance during the first month of the competitive period in professional soccer players.
Healthy professional soccer players were enrolled in this study over two pre-season periods. Data sets were available from 26 players during the first season (2014-2015) and 24 players during the second season (2015-2016) who completed two pre-season periods (6 weeks each). External training load was assessed from all athletes during training using Global Positioning System (GPS). Internal training load was monitored after each training session using rate of perceived exertion (RPE). Before and after each pre-season, blood samples were taken to determine plasma lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Injury incidence and overall performance (ranking of the team after the first five official games of the championship) were recorded for both seasons separately.
There was no statistically significant difference in mean RPE values of the two-preparation periods (2737 ± 452 and 2629 ± 786 AU, = 0.492). The correlational analysis did not reveal significant associations between internal and external training load (RPE and GPS data) and biological markers. There was a significant positive correlation between RPE and LDH during the 2015/2016 season ( = 0.974, = 0.001). In addition, a significant negative correlation was found between total distance >20 km/h and CRP during the 2015-2016 season ( = -0.863, = 0.027). The injury rates for the two seasons were 1.76 and 1.06 per 1000 h exposure for the 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 seasons, respectively ( = 0.127).
Our study showed that pre-season training load is not associated with overall team performance. This association is most likely multifactorial and other factors (e.g., technical and tactical level of the team, opponents, environment) may play an important role for the collective team performance. Our findings may help coaches to better prepare their athletes during pre-season.
关于训练负荷与受伤率之间的联系,文献中存在争议。因此,这项非干预性研究的目的是评估职业足球运动员在赛季前训练负荷与生化指标、受伤发生率以及赛季首个月比赛期间的表现之间的关系。
在两个赛季前阶段招募了健康的职业足球运动员。在第一个赛季(2014 - 2015年)有26名球员以及第二个赛季(2015 - 2016年)有24名球员的数据可用,他们都完成了两个赛季前阶段(每个阶段6周)。在训练期间使用全球定位系统(GPS)评估所有运动员的外部训练负荷。每次训练课后使用主观用力程度分级(RPE)监测内部训练负荷。在每个赛季前前后,采集血样以测定血浆乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、肌酸激酶(CK)和C反应蛋白(CRP)。分别记录两个赛季的受伤发生率和整体表现(锦标赛前五场正式比赛后球队的排名)。
两个准备阶段的平均RPE值没有统计学显著差异(2737 ± 452和2629 ± 786 AU,P = 0.492)。相关性分析未揭示内部和外部训练负荷(RPE和GPS数据)与生物学指标之间的显著关联。在2015/2016赛季,RPE与LDH之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.974,P = 0.001)。此外,在2015 - 2016赛季,总距离>20 km/h与CRP之间存在显著负相关(r = -0.863,P = 0.027)。2014 - 2015赛季和2015 - 2016赛季的受伤率分别为每1000小时暴露1.76次和1.06次(P = 0.127)。
我们的研究表明,赛季前训练负荷与球队整体表现无关。这种关联很可能是多因素的,其他因素(例如球队的技术和战术水平、对手、环境)可能对球队的集体表现起重要作用。我们的研究结果可能有助于教练在赛季前更好地准备他们的运动员。