Woodhead Z V J, Bradshaw A R, Wilson A C, Thompson P A, Bishop D V M
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Mar 13;6(3):181801. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181801. eCollection 2019 Mar.
Hemispheric dominance for language can vary from task to task, but it is unclear if this reflects error of measurement or independent lateralization of different language systems. We used functional transcranial Doppler sonography to assess language lateralization within the middle cerebral artery territory in 37 adults (seven left-handers) on six tasks, each given on two occasions. Tasks taxed different aspects of language function. A pre-registered structural equation analysis was used to compare models of means and covariances. For most people, a single lateralized factor explained most of the covariance between tasks. A minority, however, showed dissociation of asymmetry, giving a second factor. This was mostly derived from a receptive task, which was highly reliable but not lateralized. The results suggest that variation in the strength of language lateralization reflects true individual differences and not just error of measurement. The inclusion of several tasks in a laterality battery makes it easier to detect cases of atypical asymmetry.
语言的半球优势在不同任务之间可能会有所不同,但尚不清楚这是反映了测量误差还是不同语言系统的独立偏侧化。我们使用功能性经颅多普勒超声来评估37名成年人(7名左利手)在大脑中动脉区域内的语言偏侧化情况,这些成年人要完成六项任务,每项任务进行两次。这些任务对语言功能的不同方面进行了测试。我们使用预先注册的结构方程分析来比较均值和协方差模型。对于大多数人来说,一个单一的偏侧化因素解释了任务之间的大部分协方差。然而,少数人表现出不对称性的分离,产生了第二个因素。这主要源于一项接受性任务,该任务高度可靠但没有偏侧化。结果表明,语言偏侧化强度的变化反映了真正的个体差异,而不仅仅是测量误差。在偏侧化测试组中纳入多项任务使得更容易检测到非典型不对称的情况。