Suppr超能文献

对左利手和右利手成年人语言侧化多维结构的更新研究:一项采用六项语言任务的重测功能性经颅多普勒超声研究

An updated investigation of the multidimensional structure of language lateralization in left- and right-handed adults: a test-retest functional transcranial Doppler sonography study with six language tasks.

作者信息

Woodhead Z V J, Thompson P A, Karlsson E M, Bishop D V M

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Feb 3;8(2):200696. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200696.

Abstract

A previous study we reported in this journal suggested that left and right-handers may differ in their patterns of lateralization for different language tasks (Woodhead 2019 , 181801. (doi:10.1098/rsos.181801)). However, it had too few left-handers ( = 7) to reach firm conclusions. For this update paper, further participants were added to the sample to create separate groups of left- ( = 31) and right-handers ( = 43). Two hypotheses were tested: (1) that lateralization would be weaker at the group level in left-than right-handers; and (2) that left-handers would show weaker covariance in lateralization between tasks, supporting a two-factor model. All participants performed the same protocol as in our previous paper: lateralization was measured using functional transcranial Doppler sonography during six different language tasks, on two separate testing sessions. The results supported hypothesis 1, with significant differences in laterality between groups for four out of six tasks. For hypothesis 2, structural equation modelling showed that there was stronger evidence for a two-factor model in left than right-handers; furthermore, examination of the factor loadings suggested that the pattern of laterality across tasks may also differ between handedness groups. These results expand on what is known about the differences in laterality between left- and right-handers.

摘要

我们在本期刊上发表的一项先前研究表明,左撇子和右撇子在不同语言任务的偏侧化模式上可能存在差异(伍德黑德,2019,181801。(doi:10.1098/rsos.181801))。然而,该研究中的左撇子数量过少(n = 7),无法得出确凿结论。在这篇更新论文中,我们在样本中增加了更多参与者,以形成左撇子(n = 31)和右撇子(n = 43)的独立组。我们检验了两个假设:(1)在群体水平上,左撇子的偏侧化比右撇子弱;(2)左撇子在不同任务间的偏侧化协方差较弱,这支持双因素模型。所有参与者执行了与我们先前论文相同的实验方案:在两个不同的测试环节中,通过功能性经颅多普勒超声测量六个不同语言任务期间的偏侧化。结果支持了假设1,六项任务中有四项在两组之间的偏侧性存在显著差异。对于假设2,结构方程模型显示,左撇子比右撇子有更强的证据支持双因素模型;此外,对因子载荷的检验表明,不同用手习惯组在各任务间的偏侧化模式可能也存在差异。这些结果扩展了我们对左撇子和右撇子在偏侧性差异方面的认识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5796/8074662/224233ec7226/rsos200696f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验