1Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
2Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Thyroid. 2019 Jul;29(7):956-962. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0711. Epub 2019 May 30.
Active surveillance (AS) is recommended as an alternative to immediate surgery in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), but the impact of AS on quality of life has not been reported. The aim of this study was to compare quality-of-life parameters in patients with PTMC under AS versus those who underwent lobectomy (LB). In this cross-sectional study, patients with PTMC were prospectively enrolled between June 2016 and October 2017. All patients completed three questionnaires: the 12-item short-form health survey, thyroid cancer-specific quality of life, and fear of progression. The results were compared after adjusting for age, sex, and serum thyrotropin levels. The AS group comprised 43 patients, and the LB group comprised 148 patients. According to the 12-item short-form health survey questionnaire, the score for role limitations due to emotional problems showed a significant negative association between the groups (coefficient [coef]: -7.71 [confidence interval (CI) -15.26 to -0.16], = 0.045). The thyroid cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire also showed statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to three scores: neuromuscular problems (coef: 4.99 [CI 0.63-10.62], = 0.020), throat/mouth problems (coef: 5.28 [CI 0.18-10.38], = 0.043), and scar problems (coef: 9.34 [CI 4.38-14.29], < 0.001), suggesting a higher level of complaint in the LB group than in the AS group. No significant differences in fear of progression scores were seen between the two groups. Patients with PTMC underwent LB experienced more health-related problems than those managed by AS. These findings support the role of AS as a reasonable management option for patients with PTMC.
主动监测(AS)被推荐作为甲状腺微小乳头状癌(PTMC)患者立即手术的替代方案,但 AS 对生活质量的影响尚未报道。本研究旨在比较 AS 组和甲状腺叶切除术(LB)组 PTMC 患者的生活质量参数。 在这项横断面研究中,2016 年 6 月至 2017 年 10 月前瞻性纳入 PTMC 患者。所有患者均完成了三个问卷:12 项简短健康调查、甲状腺癌特异性生活质量和对进展的恐惧。在调整年龄、性别和血清促甲状腺激素水平后比较结果。 AS 组包括 43 例患者,LB 组包括 148 例患者。根据 12 项简短健康调查问卷,角色限制得分因情绪问题呈现出组间显著负相关(系数[coef]:-7.71 [置信区间(CI)-15.26 至-0.16],=0.045)。甲状腺癌特异性生活质量问卷也显示两组之间在三个评分上存在统计学差异:神经肌肉问题(coef:4.99 [CI 0.63-10.62],=0.020)、喉咙/口腔问题(coef:5.28 [CI 0.18-10.38],=0.043)和疤痕问题(coef:9.34 [CI 4.38-14.29],<0.001),提示 LB 组的抱怨程度高于 AS 组。两组间对进展的恐惧评分无显著差异。接受 LB 的 PTMC 患者经历了更多的与健康相关的问题,而不是 AS 组。这些发现支持 AS 作为 PTMC 患者合理管理选择的作用。