• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用二元决策图从参与式农村评估视角理解社区弹性

Understanding Community Resilience from a PRA Perspective Using Binary Decision Diagrams.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2019 Oct;39(10):2127-2142. doi: 10.1111/risa.13321. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13321
PMID:31039296
Abstract

Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is a useful tool to assess complex interconnected systems. This article leverages the capabilities of PRA tools developed for industrial and nuclear risk analysis in community resilience evaluations by modeling the food security of a community in terms of its built environment as an integrated system. To this end, we model the performance of Gilroy, CA, a moderate-size town, with regard to disruptions in its food supply caused by a severe earthquake. The food retailers of Gilroy, along with the electrical power network, water network elements, and bridges are considered as components of a system. Fault and event trees are constructed to model the requirements for continuous food supply to community residents and are analyzed efficiently using binary decision diagrams (BDDs). The study also identifies shortcomings in approximate classical system analysis methods in assessing community resilience. Importance factors are utilized to rank the importance of various factors to the overall risk of food insecurity. Finally, the study considers the impact of various sources of uncertainties in the hazard modeling and performance of infrastructure on food security measures. The methodology can be applicable for any existing critical infrastructure system and has potential extensions to other hazards.

摘要

概率风险评估(PRA)是评估复杂互联系统的有用工具。本文通过将社区的食品安全建模为一个综合系统,利用为工业和核风险分析开发的 PRA 工具的功能,在社区弹性评估中进行评估。为此,我们对加利福尼亚州吉尔罗伊市进行建模,考虑了由于强烈地震对其食品供应造成的中断。吉尔罗伊的食品零售商以及电网、水网元素和桥梁被视为系统的组成部分。故障和事件树被构建来模拟对社区居民持续供应食物的要求,并使用二进制决策图(BDD)进行有效分析。该研究还确定了近似经典系统分析方法在评估社区弹性方面的缺点。重要性因素用于对各种因素对粮食不安全总体风险的重要性进行排序。最后,该研究考虑了在基础设施的危害建模和性能方面各种不确定性源对食品安全措施的影响。该方法可适用于任何现有关键基础设施系统,并有可能扩展到其他危害。

相似文献

1
Understanding Community Resilience from a PRA Perspective Using Binary Decision Diagrams.运用二元决策图从参与式农村评估视角理解社区弹性
Risk Anal. 2019 Oct;39(10):2127-2142. doi: 10.1111/risa.13321. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
2
Assessing food system vulnerabilities: a fault tree modeling approach.评估食物系统脆弱性:故障树建模方法。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):817. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5563-x.
3
Probabilistic Multiple Hazard Resilience Model of an Interdependent Infrastructure System.相互依存基础设施系统的概率多灾种恢复力模型
Risk Anal. 2019 Aug;39(8):1843-1863. doi: 10.1111/risa.13305. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
4
Urban Food Supply Chain Resilience for Crises Threatening Food Security: A Qualitative Study.城市粮食供应链应对危机保障粮食安全的弹性:定性研究。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Feb;119(2):211-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
5
Agent-Based Recovery Model for Seismic Resilience Evaluation of Electrified Communities.基于智能体的电气化社区地震恢复力评估模型
Risk Anal. 2019 Jul;39(7):1597-1614. doi: 10.1111/risa.13277. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
6
Modeling the resilience of critical infrastructure: the role of network dependencies.关键基础设施恢复力建模:网络依赖性的作用。
Sustain Resilient Infrastruct. 2016;1(3-4):153-168. doi: 10.1080/23789689.2016.1254999. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
7
A comparative analysis of PRA and intelligent adversary methods for counterterrorism risk management.对反恐风险管理中的 PRA 和智能对手方法的比较分析。
Risk Anal. 2011 Sep;31(9):1488-510. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01590.x. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
8
Decision-Making Analytics Using Plural Resilience Parameters for Adaptive Management of Complex Systems.使用多元恢复力参数进行复杂系统自适应管理的决策分析
Risk Anal. 2019 Apr;39(4):871-889. doi: 10.1111/risa.13209. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
9
A network-based framework for assessing infrastructure resilience: a case study of the London metro system.一种基于网络的基础设施恢复力评估框架:以伦敦地铁系统为例
J R Soc Interface. 2016 May;13(118). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0113.
10
Assessing risk: the role of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) in patient safety improvement.评估风险:概率风险评估(PRA)在患者安全改善中的作用。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Jun;13(3):206-12. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.3.206.

引用本文的文献

1
Logical interdependencies in infrastructure: What are they, how to identify them, and what do they mean for infrastructure risk analysis?基础设施中的逻辑相互依存关系:它们是什么,如何识别它们,以及它们对基础设施风险分析意味着什么?
Risk Anal. 2025 Feb;45(2):356-375. doi: 10.1111/risa.16555. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
2
Resilience of School Systems Following Severe Earthquakes.强震后学校系统的恢复力
Earths Future. 2020 Oct;8(10):e2020EF001518. doi: 10.1029/2020EF001518. Epub 2020 Oct 15.