DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Aug;36(15-16):NP8615-NP8642. doi: 10.1177/0886260519844281. Epub 2019 May 2.
Community violence is a complex phenomenon, and many theories have been put forth to explain the causes of community violence and disparities in community violence across neighborhoods. One notable theory, collective efficacy theory (CET), posits that collective efficacy (i.e., a neighborhood's social cohesion and informal social control) mediates the association between concentrated disadvantage and community violence. As CET theorizes an inverse feedback loop between collective efficacy and community violence, collective efficacy could mitigate the link between neighborhood disadvantage and community violence. The current study examines the reciprocal association between collective efficacy and community violence exposure using data from 604 low-resourced, urban African American ninth-grade students from a large Midwestern city. Data were collected at 6-month intervals over 2 years. Significant cross-sectional associations were found between each of the collective efficacy constructs (social cohesion and informal social control) and community violence exposure, although no significant longitudinal cross-lagged associations were found. There were positive cross-sectional associations between (a) collective efficacy and community violence exposure and (b) informal social control and community violence exposure; however, the association between social cohesion and community violence exposure was negative. Associations between overall collective efficacy, as well as its subscales, and community violence exposure were consistent with hypothesized directions for social cohesion, but not for collective efficacy or informal social control. Findings support the use of collective efficacy as two constructs, rather than a single construct as proposed by Sampson et al. Implications for expanding original assumptions of CET are discussed.
社区暴力是一种复杂的现象,许多理论被提出来解释社区暴力的原因和邻里社区之间社区暴力的差异。一个引人注目的理论是集体效能理论(CET),它假设集体效能(即邻里的社会凝聚力和非正式社会控制)在集中劣势与社区暴力之间的关联中起中介作用。由于 CET 假设集体效能和社区暴力之间存在反向反馈循环,因此集体效能可以减轻邻里劣势与社区暴力之间的联系。本研究使用来自一个中西部大城市的 604 名资源匮乏的城市非裔美国 9 年级学生的数据,检验了集体效能和社区暴力暴露之间的互惠关系。数据在两年内每隔 6 个月收集一次。尽管没有发现显著的纵向交叉滞后关联,但在每个集体效能结构(社会凝聚力和非正式社会控制)和社区暴力暴露之间都发现了显著的横断面关联。集体效能与社区暴力暴露之间存在正相关(a),非正式社会控制与社区暴力暴露之间存在正相关(b);然而,社会凝聚力与社区暴力暴露之间存在负相关。总体集体效能及其子量表与社区暴力暴露之间的关联与社会凝聚力的假设方向一致,但与集体效能或非正式社会控制不一致。研究结果支持将集体效能作为两个结构,而不是 Sampson 等人提出的单个结构来使用。讨论了对 CET 原始假设的扩展的影响。