Suppr超能文献

三种不同型号自动验光仪与主观验光法在年轻成年人中屈光不正测量结果的比较。

Comparison of refractive error measurements by three different models of autorefractors and subjective refraction in young adults.

作者信息

Wosik Justyna, Patrzykont Małgorzata, Pniewski Jacek

出版信息

J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2019 Apr 1;36(4):B1-B6. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.36.0000B1.

Abstract

In this paper, the accuracy of noncycloplegic refractive error measurements performed by three autorefractors, Nidek ARK-510A, Visionix L80 Wave+, and Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001, compared with subjective refraction (SR) in young adults is analyzed using statistical methods. The analysis is carried out in terms of spherical equivalent (SE), astigmatism, and two Jackson crossed-cylinder vectors. Fifty-one subjects aged 19-23 were examined. The differences between objective refraction (OR) measured by autorefractors are not statistically significant in either SE or cylindrical components. However, in comparison with subjective refraction, the best agreement in SE was provided by K 5001. For all instruments, differences in SE between OR and SR are statistically significant.

摘要

在本文中,使用统计方法分析了三种自动验光仪(尼德克ARK-510A、威视顿L80 Wave+和新日本NVision-K 5001)在年轻成年人中进行的非散瞳屈光不正测量与主观验光(SR)相比的准确性。分析是根据等效球镜度(SE)、散光以及两个杰克逊交叉柱镜矢量进行的。对51名年龄在19至23岁之间的受试者进行了检查。自动验光仪测量的客观验光(OR)在SE或柱镜成分方面的差异均无统计学意义。然而,与主观验光相比,K 5001在SE方面的一致性最佳。对于所有仪器,OR和SR之间的SE差异具有统计学意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验