• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
End-of-Life Cancer Care Redesign: Patient and Caregiver Experiences in a Lay Health Worker-Led Intervention.临终癌症护理重新设计:在由非专业健康工作者主导的干预措施中患者及护理者的体验
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;36(12):1081-1088. doi: 10.1177/1049909119847967. Epub 2019 May 2.
2
Using the experiences of bereaved caregivers to inform patient- and caregiver-centered advance care planning.利用丧亲照护者的经验为以患者和照护者为中心的预先护理计划提供信息。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Oct;23(10):1602-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0748-0. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
3
Assessment of Bereaved Caregiver Experiences of Advance Care Planning for Children With Medical Complexity.评估有医疗复杂性儿童的临终关怀照顾者对预先医疗指示的体验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010337. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10337.
4
Addressing personal barriers to advance care planning: Qualitative investigation of a mindfulness-based intervention for adults with cancer and their family caregivers.解决预先医疗照护计划的个人障碍:针对癌症患者及其家属照护者的基于正念的干预的定性研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Jun;17(3):276-285. doi: 10.1017/S1478951518000354. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
5
African American patient and caregiver attitudes and perceptions of community health workers as lay patient navigators in palliative care.非裔美国患者及其护理人员对社区卫生工作者作为姑息治疗中初级患者导航员的态度和看法。
Ann Palliat Med. 2024 Sep;13(5):1189-1201. doi: 10.21037/apm-23-602. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
6
The impact of the caregiver-oncologist relationship on caregiver experiences of end-of-life care and bereavement outcomes.照顾者与肿瘤医生关系对照顾者临终关怀体验和丧亲结局的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4219-4225. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05185-2. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
7
Cancer Caregivers' Prognostic and End-of-Life Communication Needs and Experiences and their Impact.癌症照护者的预后和临终沟通需求、经验及其影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jan;65(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.09.012. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
8
End-of-life care decisions using a Korean advance directive among cancer patient-caregiver dyads.癌症患者-照顾者二元组中使用韩国预先指示进行的临终护理决策。
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Feb;15(1):77-87. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516000808. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
9
The interactive effect of advanced cancer patient and caregiver prognostic understanding on patients' completion of Do Not Resuscitate orders.晚期癌症患者及其照顾者对预后理解的交互作用对患者是否完成不复苏医嘱的影响。
Psychooncology. 2018 Jul;27(7):1765-1771. doi: 10.1002/pon.4723. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
Long-Term Engagement of Patients With Advanced Cancer: Results From the EPAC Randomized Clinical Trial.晚期癌症患者的长期参与:EPAC随机临床试验的结果
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Jul 1;10(7):905-911. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1221.

引用本文的文献

1
Tools for tomorrow: a scoping review of patient-facing tools for advance care planning.面向未来的工具:对用于预先医疗护理计划的患者端工具的范围综述
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Jun 24;18:26323524241263108. doi: 10.1177/26323524241263108. eCollection 2024.
2
Direct and Indirect Effects of a Web-Based Educational and Communication Skills Intervention "Promotoras de Donación" to Increase Donor Designation in Latinx Communities: Evaluation Study.基于网络的教育和沟通技巧干预“Promotoras de Donación”对拉丁裔社区增加捐赠者指定的直接和间接影响:评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 10;25:e37140. doi: 10.2196/37140.
3
Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Implementation, Adoption, and Maintenance of a Community Health Worker-Led Advance Care Planning and Cancer Symptom Screening Intervention: A Qualitative Study.卫生保健专业人员对社区卫生工作者主导的预先医疗照护计划和癌症症状筛查干预措施的实施、采用和维持的看法:一项定性研究。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jan;19(1):e138-e149. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00209. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
Improving supportive care for patients with Thoracic Malignancies - A randomized controlled trial.改善胸部恶性肿瘤患者的支持性护理——一项随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 May 27;28:100929. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100929. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
6
Association of a Lay Health Worker-Led Intervention on Goals of Care, Quality of Life, and Clinical Trial Participation Among Low-Income and Minority Adults With Cancer.非专业健康工作者主导的干预对癌症低收入和少数族裔患者的照护目标、生活质量和临床试验参与的影响。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Nov;17(11):e1753-e1762. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00100. Epub 2021 May 17.
7
Improvements in Advance Care Planning Can Translate to Patient Comfort.预先护理计划的改进可转化为患者的舒适感。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2019 Jul;10(5):424-425. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2019.10.5.1. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
8
Lay Health Workers' Perspectives on Delivery of Advance Care Planning and Symptom Screening Among Adults With Cancer: A Qualitative Study.非专业医护人员对癌症成人开展预先医疗照护计划和症状筛查的看法:一项定性研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Oct;38(10):1202-1211. doi: 10.1177/1049909120977841. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
9
The Impact of Varying Levels of Advance Care Planning Engagement on Perceptions of the End-of-Life Experience Among Caregivers of Deceased Patients With Cancer.不同程度的预先医疗照护计划参与对癌症死亡患者照护者对临终体验看法的影响。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Dec;37(12):1045-1052. doi: 10.1177/1049909120917899. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
10
Association of a Lay Health Worker Intervention With Symptom Burden, Survival, Health Care Use, and Total Costs Among Medicare Enrollees With Cancer.一项由非专业健康工作者干预措施对医疗保险参保癌症患者的症状负担、生存、医疗保健使用和总费用的影响的研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201023. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1023.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives of Health Care Payer Organizations on Cancer Care Delivery Redesign: A National Study.医疗付费方组织对癌症照护服务再设计的观点:一项全国性研究。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Jan;15(1):e46-e55. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00331. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
2
Effect of a Lay Health Worker Intervention on Goals-of-Care Documentation and on Health Care Use, Costs, and Satisfaction Among Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一项基于非专业卫生工作者的干预措施对癌症患者的照护目标记录以及医疗保健使用、成本和满意度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1359-1366. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2446.
3
Delivering End-of-Life Cancer Care: Perspectives of Providers.提供临终癌症护理:提供者的观点。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Mar;35(3):497-504. doi: 10.1177/1049909117719879. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
4
Redesigning Cancer Care Delivery: Views From Patients and Caregivers.重新设计癌症护理服务:患者及护理人员的观点
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Apr;13(4):e291-e302. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.017327. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
5
Quality of End-of-Life Care Provided to Patients With Different Serious Illnesses.不同严重疾病患者临终关怀质量。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Aug 1;176(8):1095-102. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1200.
6
Redesigning Advanced Cancer Care Delivery: Three Ways to Create Higher Value Cancer Care.重新设计晚期癌症护理服务:创造更高价值癌症护理的三种方法。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jul;11(4):280-4. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001065. Epub 2015 May 19.
7
Health care costs for patients with cancer at the end of life.终末期癌症患者的医疗保健费用。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Nov;8(6):75s-80s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000469. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
8
Patients' expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer.晚期癌症化疗效果的患者期望。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 25;367(17):1616-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1204410.
9
End-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries with cancer is highly intensive overall and varies widely.总体而言,医疗保险受益人的癌症终末期护理强度很高,且差异很大。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr;31(4):786-96. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0650.
10
Estimate of current hospice and palliative medicine physician workforce shortage.当前缓和医学医生劳动力短缺的估计。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Dec;40(6):899-911. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.07.004.

临终癌症护理重新设计:在由非专业健康工作者主导的干预措施中患者及护理者的体验

End-of-Life Cancer Care Redesign: Patient and Caregiver Experiences in a Lay Health Worker-Led Intervention.

作者信息

Patel Manali I, Moore David, Coker Tumaini R

机构信息

1 Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

2 Medical Services, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;36(12):1081-1088. doi: 10.1177/1049909119847967. Epub 2019 May 2.

DOI:10.1177/1049909119847967
PMID:31046401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6776082/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Engagement of Patients with Advanced Cancer (EPAC), comprised of a lay health worker (LHW) who assists patients with advance care planning, is an effective intervention for improving patient experiences and reducing acute care use and total health-care costs. The objective of this study was to assess patients' and caregivers' experiences with the intervention.

METHODS

We invited all patients enrolled in EPAC and their caregivers to complete an 8-item survey at the end of the intervention and a random 35% sample to participate in a qualitative interview to assess their experiences. At 15-month follow-up, we invited all caregivers of patients who died during the study to participate in a qualitative interview. We analyzed survey responses using bivariate methods and recorded, transcribed, and analyzed interviews using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were alive at completion of the intervention and all 30 identified caregivers completed the survey. All viewed the intervention as a critical part of cancer care and recommended the intervention for other patients. In qualitative interviews, among 30 patients, all reported improved comfort in discussing their end-of-life care preferences. In qualitative interviews with 24 bereaved caregivers, all viewed the intervention as critical in ensuring that their loved ones' wishes were adhered to at the end of life.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Incorporating an LHW into end-of-life cancer care is an approach supported and viewed as highly effective in improving care by patients and caregivers. The LHW-led EPAC intervention is one solution that can significantly impact patient and caregiver experiences.

摘要

重要性

晚期癌症患者参与计划(EPAC)由一名协助患者进行临终关怀计划的非专业医护人员(LHW)组成,是一项改善患者体验、减少急性护理使用和降低总体医疗成本的有效干预措施。本研究的目的是评估患者及其护理人员对该干预措施的体验。

方法

我们邀请了所有参与EPAC的患者及其护理人员在干预结束时完成一项包含8个项目的调查,并随机抽取35%的样本参与定性访谈以评估他们的体验。在15个月的随访中,我们邀请了所有在研究期间死亡患者的护理人员参与定性访谈。我们使用双变量方法分析调查回复,并使用定性内容分析法记录、转录和分析访谈内容。

结果

干预结束时69名患者存活,所有30名确定的护理人员完成了调查。所有人都将该干预视为癌症护理的关键部分,并推荐其他患者采用该干预措施。在定性访谈中,30名患者均表示在讨论临终护理偏好时更加自在。在对24名丧亲护理人员的定性访谈中,所有人都认为该干预对于确保他们所爱的人在生命尽头的愿望得到遵循至关重要。

结论及意义

将非专业医护人员纳入临终癌症护理是一种得到患者和护理人员支持且被视为对改善护理非常有效的方法。由非专业医护人员主导的EPAC干预是一种能够显著影响患者和护理人员体验的解决方案。