• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为外部性的伤害:创伤的经济学视角

Injury as externality: an economic perspective of trauma.

作者信息

Lave L B

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 1987 Feb;19(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90015-7.

DOI:10.1016/0001-4575(87)90015-7
PMID:3105550
Abstract

Economists emphasize the costs in dollars or other desirable outcomes of additional safety in contrast to safety experts who remind people to design safe products and operate them safely. Society loses emotionally and financially from traumatic injury. The emotional loss must be balanced against allowing individuals free choice and encouraging them to develop judgment. Individuals are viewed as making their own best safety decisions, although they must have good information and face the correct indentives. Currently, society subsidizes risk taking in many ways, thereby discouraging safety. Health and life insurance ought to be required along with liability insurance, to correct the incentives to drivers. In addition, regulation is required to deal with physical externalities.

摘要

经济学家强调增加安全性所带来的以美元或其他理想结果衡量的成本,而安全专家则提醒人们设计安全的产品并安全地操作它们。社会因创伤性伤害在情感和经济方面遭受损失。情感损失必须与允许个人自由选择并鼓励他们培养判断力相权衡。尽管个人必须掌握充分信息并面对正确的激励措施,但他们被视为在做出自己的最佳安全决策。目前,社会在许多方面补贴冒险行为,从而不利于安全。应该要求提供健康和人寿保险以及责任保险,以纠正对司机的激励措施。此外,需要进行监管以应对物理外部性。

相似文献

1
Injury as externality: an economic perspective of trauma.作为外部性的伤害:创伤的经济学视角
Accid Anal Prev. 1987 Feb;19(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90015-7.
2
Estimation of the social costs of home injury: a comparison with estimates for road injury.家庭伤害的社会成本估算:与道路伤害估算的比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):998-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.027. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
3
Evaluating voluntary risks of injury.评估自愿性受伤风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 1987 Feb;19(1):51-62. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90017-0.
4
Our second responsibility in trauma care. A new clause in the social contract.
Bull Am Coll Surg. 1994 Mar;79(3):23-35.
5
Cost-benefit analysis of fall injuries prevented by a programme of home modifications: a cluster randomised controlled trial.一项通过家庭改造计划预防跌倒伤害的成本效益分析:一项整群随机对照试验。
Inj Prev. 2017 Feb;23(1):22-26. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041947. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
Public policy and automobile occupant restraint: an economist's perspective.公共政策与汽车乘员约束:一位经济学家的视角
Accid Anal Prev. 1987 Feb;19(1):39-50. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90016-9.
7
Negative freedom and death in the United States.美国的消极自由与死亡
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2163-4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.179259. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
8
Human resources for the control of road traffic injury.道路交通伤害控制的人力资源。
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Apr;83(4):294-300. Epub 2005 Apr 25.
9
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
10
Motorcycle-related injuries: the high costs of riding.与摩托车相关的伤害:骑行的高昂代价。
Tex Med. 2004 Oct;100(10):56-63.