Dyar Christina, Messinger Adam M, Newcomb Michael E, Byck Gayle R, Dunlap Parks, Whitton Sarah W
Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Aug;36(15-16):NP8824-NP8851. doi: 10.1177/0886260519846856. Epub 2019 May 5.
Measures of intimate partner violence (IPV) have largely been developed and validated in heterosexual, cisgender samples, with little attention to whether these measures are culturally appropriate for sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations. However, rates of IPV are two to three times higher among SGM than heterosexual populations, highlighting the importance of culturally appropriate measures of IPV for SGM populations. In this article, after reviewing key problems with the use of existing IPV measures with SGM samples, we describe the development of a toolkit of new and adapted measures of IPV for use with SGM assigned female at birth (SGM-AFAB) populations, including an adapted version of the Conflict Tactics Scale-Revised, an adapted measure of coercive control, and the newly developed SGM-Specific IPV Tactics Measure. Using data from a sample of 352 SGM-AFAB individuals, we then test the psychometric properties of these three measures, including their factor structures, internal reliability, and convergent/divergent validity. Results provide initial evidence of the reliability and validity of each measure. Together, these three measures comprise a culturally appropriate and psychometrically validated measurement toolkit for studying a broad range of IPV tactics among SGM-AFAB that will help build a foundation for more in-depth research into IPV in SGM populations.
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的测量方法主要是在异性恋、顺性别样本中开发和验证的,很少关注这些测量方法在文化上是否适用于性少数和性别少数(SGM)群体。然而,SGM群体中IPV的发生率是异性恋群体的两到三倍,这凸显了针对SGM群体制定文化上合适的IPV测量方法的重要性。在本文中,在回顾了对SGM样本使用现有IPV测量方法的关键问题后,我们描述了一套针对出生时被认定为女性的SGM(SGM-AFAB)群体的新的和经过改编的IPV测量方法工具包的开发过程,包括《冲突策略量表修订版》的改编版本、一种强制控制的改编测量方法,以及新开发的特定于SGM的IPV策略测量方法。然后,我们使用来自352名SGM-AFAB个体样本的数据,测试这三种测量方法的心理测量特性,包括它们的因子结构、内部信度以及聚合效度/区分效度。结果为每种测量方法的信度和效度提供了初步证据。这三种测量方法共同构成了一个在文化上合适且经过心理测量验证的测量工具包,用于研究SGM-AFAB群体中广泛的IPV策略,这将有助于为更深入研究SGM群体中的IPV奠定基础。