Suppr超能文献

医疗保健公平性分析:在肯尼亚权力下放后,应用田端健康服务覆盖模型分析社区卫生系统。

Healthcare equity analysis: applying the Tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in Kenya.

机构信息

Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK.

LVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2019 May 7;18(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0967-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Universal health coverage (UHC) is growing as a national political priority, within the context of recently devolved decision-making processes in Kenya. Increasingly voices within these discussions are highlighting the need for actions towards UHC to focus on quality of services, as well as improving coverage through expansion of national health insurance fund (NHIF) enrolment. Improving health equity is one of the most frequently described objectives for devolution of health services. Previous studies, however, highlight the complexity and unpredictability of devolution processes, potentially contributing to widening rather than reducing disparities. Our study applied Tanahashi's equity model (according to availability, accessibility, acceptability, contact with and quality) to review perceived equity of health services by actors across the health system and at community level, following changes to the priority-setting process at sub-national levels post devolution in Kenya.

METHODS

We carried out a qualitative study between March 2015 and April 2016, involving 269 key informant and in-depth interviews from different levels of the health system in ten counties and 14 focus group discussions with community members in two of these counties. Qualitative data were analysed using the framework approach.

RESULTS

Our findings reveal that devolution in Kenya has focused on improving the supply side of health services, by expanding the availability, geographic and financial accessibility of health services across many counties. However, there has been limited emphasis and investment in promoting the demand side, including restricted efforts to promote acceptability or use of services. Respondents perceived that the quality of health services has typically been neglected within priority-setting to date.

CONCLUSIONS

If Kenya is to achieve universal health coverage for all citizens, then county governments must address all aspects of equity, including quality. Through application of the Tanahashi framework, we find that community health services can play a crucial role towards achieving health equity.

摘要

背景

在肯尼亚最近权力下放的决策过程中,全民健康覆盖(UHC)作为国家政治优先事项不断发展。在这些讨论中,越来越多的声音强调,全民健康覆盖行动需要关注服务质量,同时通过扩大国家健康保险基金(NHIF)的参保人数来提高覆盖率。增进卫生公平是卫生服务权力下放最常描述的目标之一。然而,之前的研究强调了权力下放进程的复杂性和不可预测性,这可能导致差距扩大而不是缩小。我们的研究应用 Tanahashi 的公平模型(根据可及性、可及性、可接受性、接触和质量),审查了卫生系统内各部门和社区一级的行为者对卫生服务的公平性的看法,这些变化是肯尼亚权力下放后,国家以下各级优先事项设定过程发生变化的结果。

方法

我们在 2015 年 3 月至 2016 年 4 月期间进行了一项定性研究,涉及肯尼亚 10 个县的 269 名关键信息提供者和深入访谈,以及其中 2 个县的 14 个社区成员焦点小组讨论。使用框架方法分析定性数据。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,肯尼亚的权力下放侧重于通过扩大许多县的卫生服务的供应,增加卫生服务的可及性、地理和财政可及性。然而,在促进需求方面,包括促进服务的可接受性或使用方面,关注和投资有限。受访者认为,迄今为止,在确定优先事项方面,卫生服务的质量通常被忽视。

结论

如果肯尼亚要实现全民健康覆盖,那么县政府必须解决公平的所有方面,包括质量。通过应用 Tanahashi 框架,我们发现社区卫生服务可以在实现卫生公平方面发挥关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0521/6505258/8833c777e6e0/12939_2019_967_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验