University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Kibabii University, Bungoma, Kenya.
Public Health. 2020 Dec;189:135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
The aim of the present study was to systematically review the progress and challenges on the devolved healthcare system in Kenya.
A systematic review design was adopted for the present study.
Literature search was on biomedical databases of the most recent available electronic data published in English, that is, between January 2012 and April 2020. The populations for eligible studies were stakeholders within the county governments, healthcare workers and community dwellers. The databases included PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar. The following were the key words used in the search: 'Devolution of Health' 'Health care system in Kenya' AND 'County Health Facilities' 'challenges' AND 'progress' AND 'Kenya'. Other literature sources were after screening of all the references of all the added articles. Before the development of search terms, we looked for appropriate Medical Subject Headings terms and applied with maximal truncations. The data were qualitatively analysed, and findings were presented by three thematic domains.
The search generated 1109 articles, of which 23 articles met the inclusion criteria. Data were presented and organized under three thematic domains: (1) localised decision-making process, (2) improvement in structural development and (3) inadequate resources/funds/staff.
This is a systematic review which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first study of its kind to present the available evidence on the progress and challenges on the devolved healthcare system in Kenya. The major findings of this review were as follows: there was improvement in the health structural development that was brought by devolution in the country. However, devolution is not free of challenges. The major challenges noted in the postdevolution era within the health sector include inadequate resources/funds from the national government and understaffed health facilities. The study recommends allocation of resources to counties commensurate with the devolved functions. The study calls out for further research on equity and equality of the devolved healthcare system in Kenya.
本研究旨在系统回顾肯尼亚分权医疗体系的进展和挑战。
本研究采用系统评价设计。
文献检索针对最近可获得的英文电子数据,即 2012 年 1 月至 2020 年 4 月期间发表的生物医学数据库。符合条件的研究的人群包括县政府内部的利益相关者、医疗保健工作者和社区居民。数据库包括 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Google Scholar。搜索中使用的关键词如下:“卫生分权”“肯尼亚卫生保健系统”和“县卫生设施”“挑战”和“进展”和“肯尼亚”。其他文献来源是在筛选所有添加文章的参考文献之后。在制定搜索术语之前,我们寻找了适当的医学主题词,并进行了最大程度的截断。数据进行了定性分析,并通过三个主题领域呈现结果。
搜索生成了 1109 篇文章,其中 23 篇符合纳入标准。数据以三个主题领域呈现和组织:(1)本地化决策过程,(2)结构发展的改善和(3)资源/资金/人员不足。
这是一项系统评价,据我们所知,这是第一项展示肯尼亚分权医疗体系进展和挑战的现有证据的研究。本综述的主要发现如下:该国的分权带来了卫生结构发展的改善。然而,分权并非没有挑战。在后分权时代,卫生部门面临的主要挑战包括国家政府提供的资源/资金不足和卫生设施人手不足。研究建议按照分权职能向县分配资源。该研究呼吁对肯尼亚分权医疗体系的公平和平等进行进一步研究。