• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

elective 学术和行政高级药学实践经验的纵向结果。

Longitudinal Outcomes of an Elective Academic and Administrative Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience.

机构信息

The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center College of Pharmacy, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Editorial Board Member, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Arlington, Virginia.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Apr;83(3):6587. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6587.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe6587
PMID:31065161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6498197/
Abstract

To evaluate the impact of an academic and administrative advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) on participants' career choice and long-term retention of teaching knowledge. Participants in an academic and administrative APPE from 2009 to 2016 completed a questionnaire about the experience and a 20-item knowledge test covering the five APPE modules. In addition, a retrospective review of graduates from the same timeframe was conducted to determine their faculty and preceptor status. Of the 17 APPE participants, 16 completed the study and 100% reported that the experience helped them understand what it means to be a faculty member and an effective preceptor. The study participants completed the APPE knowledge test over the five modules. Participants passed four of the five module tests, including that for the instructional design module. A greater proportion of participants (75%) obtained faculty positions than did graduates who had not completed the APPE (9%). Seventy-one percent of students became active preceptors compared to 53% of students who did not complete the academic and administrative APPE, but this difference was not significant as the study was not powered to detect a difference. A longitudinal analysis of an academic and administrative APPE found that 75% of participants pursued a faculty position and retained their knowledge over time. A majority of the APPE participants (71%) and nonparticipants (53%) obtained a preceptor license. The outcomes support continued offering of the academic and administrative APPE to fourth-year pharmacy (P4) students. Requiring all P4 students to complete the APPE could help make them "preceptor ready."

摘要

评估学术和管理型进阶药剂实践经验(APPE)对参与者职业选择和长期保留教学知识的影响。2009 年至 2016 年期间参加学术和管理型 APPE 的参与者完成了一份关于该经验的问卷和涵盖五个 APPE 模块的 20 项知识测试。此外,还对同一时间段的毕业生进行了回顾性审查,以确定他们的教师和导师身份。在 17 名 APPE 参与者中,有 16 名完成了研究,100%的人报告说,这一经历帮助他们了解成为一名教师和一名有效导师的含义。研究参与者完成了五个模块的 APPE 知识测试。参与者通过了五个模块测试中的四个,包括教学设计模块。完成 APPE 的参与者获得教职的比例(75%)高于未完成 APPE 的毕业生(9%)。与未完成学术和管理型 APPE 的学生相比,71%的学生成为了活跃的导师,而 53%的学生成为了活跃的导师,但这一差异并不显著,因为该研究没有足够的能力来检测差异。对学术和管理型 APPE 的纵向分析发现,75%的参与者追求教职,并随着时间的推移保留了他们的知识。大多数 APPE 参与者(71%)和非参与者(53%)获得了导师执照。这些结果支持继续为第四年药学(P4)学生提供学术和管理型 APPE。要求所有 P4 学生完成 APPE 可以帮助他们“做好导师准备”。

相似文献

1
Longitudinal Outcomes of an Elective Academic and Administrative Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience. elective 学术和行政高级药学实践经验的纵向结果。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Apr;83(3):6587. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6587.
2
Providing an Academic APPE Elective via Videoconference Between Off-campus Faculty and Students.通过校外教师和学生之间的视频会议提供学术实习评估选修课。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Oct;82(8):6645. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6645.
3
Evaluating Practice Readiness of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience Students Using the Core Entrustable Professional Activities.使用核心可托付专业活动评估高级药学实践经验学生的实践准备情况。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Oct;84(10):ajpe7853. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7853.
4
Comparison of full-time faculty preceptor and volunteer preceptor evaluations of experiential students.全职导师和志愿者导师对实习学生的评价比较。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Dec;12(12):1417-1423. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
5
A Precepting-Focused Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience in Academia.学术界以带教为重点的高级药学实践经验
Innov Pharm. 2020 Nov 10;11(4). doi: 10.24926/iip.v11i4.2419. eCollection 2020.
6
An advanced pharmacy practice experience in academia.在学术界的高级药学实践经历。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Oct 15;70(5):97. doi: 10.5688/aj700597.
7
A collaborative and reflective academic advanced pharmacy practice experience.协作和反思的学术高级药学实践经验。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Aug 10;75(6):120. doi: 10.5688/ajpe756120.
8
An advanced pharmacy practice experience in academia: More benefit than burden!学术界的高级药学实践经验:益处多于负担!
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Apr;10(4):399-402. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.12.022. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
9
Faculty preceptors' strategies for teaching clinical reasoning skills in the advanced pharmacy practice experience setting.教师在高级药学实践经验环境中教授临床推理技能的策略。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Jun;13(6):623-627. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.01.023. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
10
Impact of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences on Residency Interview Invitations.高级药学实践经验对住院医师面试邀请的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Feb;84(2):7575. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7575.

引用本文的文献

1
An Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience in a University's Office of Experiential Education.在大学体验式教育办公室的高级药学实践经验。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Mar;86(3):8429. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8429. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
2
Strategies for Measuring Advances in Pharmacy Student Learning.测量药学学生学习进展的策略。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Apr;86(4):8707. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8707. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
3
Design and Evaluation of Scholarship and Research Orientation Sessions in Academic Pharmacy Practice Experiences.学术药学实践经验中学术奖学金与研究方向课程的设计与评估
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021 May 5;8:23821205211014897. doi: 10.1177/23821205211014897. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
A Pharmacotherapy Capstone Course to Target Student Learning and Programmatic Curricular Assessment.一门旨在针对学生学习和课程项目评估的药物治疗顶点课程。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Apr;81(3):45. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81345.
2
What Should Constitute an Acceptable Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience?什么应构成可接受的高级药学实践经验?
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Apr 25;80(3):37. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80337.
3
Quantity vs Quality in Experiential Education.体验式教育中的数量与质量
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Apr 25;80(3):36. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80336.
4
Proctoring strategies for computer-based and paper-based tests.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Mar 1;73(5):274-7. doi: 10.2146/ajhp150678.
5
Delivering an effective presentation.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Jul 1;72(13):1091-4. doi: 10.2146/ajhp150047.
6
Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes.药剂教育促进中心 2013 年教育成果。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Oct 14;77(8):162. doi: 10.5688/ajpe778162.
7
Assessing students' motivation during advanced pharmacy practice experiences.评估学生在高级药学实践经历中的动机。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011 Dec 1;68(23):2230, 2235. doi: 10.2146/ajhp110275.
8
A collaborative and reflective academic advanced pharmacy practice experience.协作和反思的学术高级药学实践经验。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Aug 10;75(6):120. doi: 10.5688/ajpe756120.
9
Teaching during residency: five steps to better lecturing skills.住院医师培训期间的教学:提升授课技巧的五个步骤。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011 Mar 1;68(5):382-7. doi: 10.2146/ajhp100421.
10
Using the three e's (emphasis, expectations, and evaluation) to structure writing objectives for pharmacy practice experiences.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010 Apr 1;67(7):516-21. doi: 10.2146/ajhp090227.