Satani Nikunj, Cai Chunyan, Giridhar Kaavya, McGhiey Daryl, George Sarah, Parsha Kaushik, Nghiem Duyen M, Valenzuela Krystal S, Riecke Jenny, Vahidy Farhaan S, Savitz Sean I
McGovern Medical School, Institute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
McGovern Medical School, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Front Neurol. 2019 Apr 24;10:405. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00405. eCollection 2019.
Following extensive, positive results in pre-clinical experiments, Bone Marrow Derived-Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (BM-MSCs) are now being tested as a novel therapy for ischemic stroke in ongoing clinical trials. However, multiple critical questions relating to their translational application remain to be clarified. We performed a comprehensive, systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies to evaluate the efficacy of BM-MSCs on functional outcomes after ischemic stroke, as well as the independent role of translational factors on their effect size. We systematically reviewed the literature and identified articles using BM-MSCs in animal models of focal ischemic stroke. After abstraction of all relevant data, we performed a meta-analysis to estimate the combined effect size of behavioral endpoints after BM-MSC administration. To describe the effect size across many behavioral outcomes, we divided these outcomes into four categories: (1) Composite scores, (2) Motor Tests, (3) Sensorimotor Tests, and (4) Cognitive Tests. We also performed a meta-regression analysis for measuring the effect of individual characteristics of BM-MSC administration on the effect size. Our results from 141 articles indicate a significant beneficial effect on composite, motor, and sensorimotor outcomes after treatment with BM-MSCs compared to control groups. We found no major differences in treatment effect based on delivery route, dose, fresh vs. frozen preparation, or passage number. There were no consistent findings supporting a difference in treatment effect based on time windows from acute periods (0-6 h) vs. later windows (2-7 days). Furthermore, these positive treatment effects on functional outcome were consistent across different labs in different parts of the world as well as over the last 18 years. There was a negative correlation between publication year and impact factor. Our results show worldwide efficacy of BM-MSCs in improving functional outcomes in pre-clinical animal models of stroke and support testing these cells in clinical trials in various ranges of time windows using different delivery routes. The continued growing number of publications showing functional benefit of BM-MSCs are now adding limited value to an oversaturated literature spanning 18 years. Researchers should focus on identifying definitive mechanisms on how BM-MSCs lead to benefit in stroke models.
在临床前实验中取得广泛的积极成果后,骨髓来源的间充质基质细胞(BM-MSCs)目前正在正在进行的临床试验中作为缺血性中风的一种新型疗法进行测试。然而,与其转化应用相关的多个关键问题仍有待阐明。我们对临床前研究进行了全面、系统的综述和荟萃分析,以评估BM-MSCs对缺血性中风后功能结局的疗效,以及转化因素对其效应大小的独立作用。我们系统地回顾了文献,并在局灶性缺血性中风动物模型中鉴定了使用BM-MSCs的文章。在提取所有相关数据后,我们进行了荟萃分析,以估计BM-MSC给药后行为终点的综合效应大小。为了描述许多行为结局的效应大小,我们将这些结局分为四类:(1)综合评分,(2)运动测试,(3)感觉运动测试,以及(4)认知测试。我们还进行了荟萃回归分析,以测量BM-MSC给药的个体特征对效应大小的影响。我们从141篇文章中得出的结果表明,与对照组相比,BM-MSCs治疗后对综合、运动和感觉运动结局有显著的有益影响。我们发现,基于给药途径、剂量、新鲜与冷冻制剂或传代次数,治疗效果没有重大差异。没有一致的研究结果支持基于急性期(0-6小时)与后期(2-7天)时间窗的治疗效果存在差异。此外,这些对功能结局的积极治疗效果在世界不同地区的不同实验室以及过去18年中都是一致的。发表年份与影响因子之间存在负相关。我们的结果表明,BM-MSCs在改善临床前中风动物模型的功能结局方面具有全球疗效,并支持在临床试验中使用不同给药途径在不同时间窗范围内对这些细胞进行测试。越来越多的出版物显示BM-MSCs具有功能益处,但在跨越长达18年的过度饱和文献中,其价值有限。研究人员应专注于确定BM-MSCs在中风模型中产生益处的确切机制。