Suppr超能文献

两种“同一健康”干预措施预防弓形虫病的社会成本效益分析。

A social cost-benefit analysis of two One Health interventions to prevent toxoplasmosis.

机构信息

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Tilburg University, Tranzo, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 May 10;14(5):e0216615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216615. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

In the Netherlands, toxoplasmosis ranks second in disease burden among foodborne pathogens with an estimated health loss of 1,900 Disability Adjusted Life Years and a cost-of-illness estimated at €45 million annually. Therefore, effective and preferably cost-effective preventive interventions are warranted. Freezing meat intended for raw or undercooked consumption and improving biosecurity in pig farms are promising interventions to prevent Toxoplasma gondii infections in humans. Putting these interventions into practice would expectedly reduce the number of infections; however, the net benefits for society are unknown. Stakeholders bearing the costs for these interventions will not necessary coincide with the ones having the benefits. We performed a Social Cost-Benefit Analysis to evaluate the net value of two potential interventions for the Dutch society. We assessed the costs and benefits of the two interventions and compared them with the current practice of education, especially during pregnancy. A 'minimum scenario' and a 'maximum scenario' was assumed, using input parameters with least benefits to society and input parameters with most benefits to society, respectively. For both interventions, we performed different scenario analyses. The freezing meat intervention was far more effective than the biosecurity intervention. Despite high freezing costs, freezing two meat products: steak tartare and mutton leg yielded net social benefits in both the minimum and maximum scenario, ranging from €10.6 million to €31 million for steak tartare and €0.6 million to €1.5 million for mutton leg. The biosecurity intervention would result in net costs in all scenarios ranging from €1 million to €2.5 million, due to high intervention costs and limited benefits. From a public health perspective (i.e. reducing the burden of toxoplasmosis) and the societal perspective (i.e. a net benefit for the Dutch society) freezing steak tartare and leg of mutton is to be considered.

摘要

在荷兰,弓形虫病是食源性病原体疾病负担中的第二大疾病,据估计每年造成 1900 个伤残调整生命年的健康损失和 4500 万欧元的疾病负担。因此,需要采取有效的、最好是具有成本效益的预防干预措施。冷冻拟用于生食或未煮熟食用的肉类和改善养猪场的生物安全是预防人类感染弓形虫的有前途的干预措施。实施这些干预措施预计会减少感染人数;然而,对于社会的净效益尚不清楚。承担这些干预措施成本的利益相关者不一定与获得利益的利益相关者一致。我们进行了一项社会成本效益分析,以评估两种潜在干预措施对荷兰社会的净价值。我们评估了两种干预措施的成本和效益,并将其与当前的教育实践进行了比较,特别是在怀孕期间。我们假设了“最低情景”和“最高情景”,分别使用对社会收益最小和对社会收益最大的输入参数。对于这两种干预措施,我们进行了不同的情景分析。冷冻肉类干预措施比生物安全干预措施更有效。尽管冷冻成本很高,但冷冻两种肉类产品:鞑靼牛排和羊肉腿,在最低和最高情景下都产生了净社会效益,鞑靼牛排的净社会效益从 1060 万欧元到 3100 万欧元不等,羊肉腿的净社会效益从 60 万欧元到 150 万欧元不等。由于干预成本高而收益有限,生物安全干预措施将在所有情景下导致净成本,从 100 万欧元到 2500 万欧元不等。从公共卫生的角度(即减轻弓形虫病的负担)和社会的角度(即对荷兰社会的净效益)来看,应考虑冷冻鞑靼牛排和羊肉腿。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa11/6510435/0ee332532291/pone.0216615.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验