1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
2School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 May 10;31(3):310-316. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.SPINE181472. Print 2019 Sep 1.
OBJECTIVE: The published clinical trials of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) have unanimously demonstrated the success of preservation of motion (average 7°-9°) at the index level for up to 10 years postoperatively. The inclusion criteria in these trials usually required patients to have evident mobility at the level to be treated (≥ 2° on lateral flexion-extension radiographs) prior to the surgery. Although the mean range of motion (ROM) remained similar after CDA, it was unclear in these trials if patients with less preoperative ROM would have different outcomes than patients with more ROM. METHODS: A series of consecutive patients who underwent CDA at the level of C5-6 were followed up and retrospectively reviewed. The indications for surgery were medically refractory cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, or both, caused by cervical disc herniation or spondylosis. All patients were assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a less-mobile group, which consisted of those patients who had an ROM of ≤ 5° at C5-6 preoperatively, or a more-mobile group, which consisted of patients whose ROM at C5-6 was > 5° preoperatively. Clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale, Neck Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale scores, were evaluated at each time point. Radiological outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients who had follow-up for more than 2 years were analyzed. There were 27 patients in the less-mobile group (mean preoperative ROM 3.0°) and 33 in the more-mobile group (mean ROM 11.7°). The 2 groups were similar in demographics, including age, sex, diabetes, and cigarette smoking. Both groups had significant improvements in clinical outcomes, with no significant differences between the 2 groups. However, the radiological evaluations demonstrated remarkable differences. The less-mobile group had a greater increase in ΔROM than the more-mobile group (ΔROM 5.5° vs 0.1°, p = 0.001), though the less-mobile group still had less segmental mobility (ROM 8.5° vs 11.7°, p = 0.04). The rates of complications were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative segmental mobility did not alter the clinical outcomes of CDA. The preoperatively less-mobile (ROM ≤ 5°) discs had similar clinical improvements and greater increase of segmental mobility (ΔROM), but remained less mobile, than the preoperatively more-mobile (ROM > 5°) discs at 2 years postoperatively.
目的:已发表的颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)临床试验一致证明,术后长达 10 年,指数水平的运动(平均 7°-9°)得以保留。这些试验的纳入标准通常要求在手术前治疗水平有明显的活动度(侧屈-伸展位 X 线片上≥2°)。尽管 CDA 后平均活动范围(ROM)保持相似,但这些试验中不清楚术前 ROM 较少的患者是否会比 ROM 较多的患者有不同的结果。
方法:对在 C5-6 水平行 CDA 的一系列连续患者进行随访并回顾性分析。手术指征为颈椎间盘突出症或颈椎病引起的药物难治性颈神经根病、脊髓病或两者。所有患者分为两组:活动度较小组,术前 C5-6 处 ROM≤5°;活动度较大组,术前 C5-6 处 ROM>5°。评估每个时间点的临床结果,包括视觉模拟评分、颈椎残障指数和日本矫形协会量表评分。还评估了影像学结果。
结果:共分析了 60 例随访时间超过 2 年的患者。活动度较小组(术前 ROM 平均 3.0°)有 27 例,活动度较大组(术前 ROM 平均 11.7°)有 33 例。两组在人口统计学方面相似,包括年龄、性别、糖尿病和吸烟。两组的临床结果均有显著改善,两组之间无显著差异。然而,影像学评估显示出显著差异。活动度较小组的 ROM 增加量(ΔROM)大于活动度较大组(ΔROM 5.5° vs 0.1°,p=0.001),尽管活动度较小组的节段活动度仍较小(ROM 8.5° vs 11.7°,p=0.04)。两组并发症发生率相似。
结论:术前节段活动度并不改变 CDA 的临床结果。术前活动度较小(ROM≤5°)的椎间盘在术后 2 年时具有相似的临床改善和更大的节段活动度(ΔROM)增加,但仍较术前活动度较大(ROM>5°)的椎间盘活动度小。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019-5-10
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019-11-1
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018-11-16
Neurosurg Focus. 2017-2
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017-5
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020-7-13
Front Surg. 2023-9-6
Int J Spine Surg. 2023-4
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2021-8-2
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2021-8-23
Global Spine J. 2023-10
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020-7-13