Food Science and Technology Program, Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 3, 117543, Singapore; Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, 117549, Singapore.
Food Science and Technology Program, Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 3, 117543, Singapore.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Jul;29(7):653-664. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
Effects of whole egg consumption on cardiovascular diseases (CVD) risk in the middle-aged and older population remain unclear due to inconsistent findings from observational and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impacts of whole egg and egg category (whole eggs versus egg substitutes) intake quantity on CVD risk factors from systematically searched RCTs. Egg substitutes were hypothesized to have minimal effects of the blood lipid and lipoprotein profile as they are void of dietary cholesterol.
As many as 434 studies identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Medline (Ovid) databases were screened and data were extracted from 8 selected RCTs. Quality of the selected studies were assessed and the overall effect sizes of weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated using a random effects model. Non-differential effects in blood pressures, lipids and lipoproteins were observed when >4 whole eggs/week compared to ≤4 whole eggs/week were consumed. Intake of >4 whole eggs/week compared to equivalent amounts of egg substitutes caused greater elevations in blood total cholesterol (WMD: 0.198 mmol/L; 95% CIs: 0.056, 0.339), HDL cholesterol (WMD: 0.068 mmol/L; 95% CIs: 0.006, 0.130) and LDL cholesterol (WMD: 0.171 mmol/L; 95% CIs: 0.028, 0.315) but did not differentially affect triglycerides concentration.
Overall, the results support the notion that quantity of whole egg intake does not affect CVD risk factors and consuming egg substitutes may also be beneficial compared to whole eggs on lowering CVD risk in the middle-aged and older population.
由于观察性研究和随机对照试验(RCT)的结果不一致,全蛋摄入对中年及以上人群心血管疾病(CVD)风险的影响仍不清楚。本荟萃分析旨在评估系统搜索的 RCT 中全蛋和蛋类(全蛋与蛋替代品)摄入量对 CVD 危险因素的影响。由于蛋替代品不含膳食胆固醇,因此假设它们对血脂和脂蛋白谱的影响最小。
从 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL 和 Medline(Ovid)数据库中筛选出多达 434 项研究,并从 8 项选定的 RCT 中提取数据。评估了所选研究的质量,并使用随机效应模型计算了加权均数差(WMD)的总体效应大小。与每周食用≤4 个全蛋相比,每周食用>4 个全蛋时,血压、血脂和脂蛋白无差异。与等量的蛋替代品相比,每周摄入>4 个全蛋会导致总胆固醇(WMD:0.198mmol/L;95%CI:0.056,0.339)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(WMD:0.068mmol/L;95%CI:0.006,0.130)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(WMD:0.171mmol/L;95%CI:0.028,0.315)显著升高,但对甘油三酯浓度没有差异影响。
总的来说,这些结果支持了这样的观点,即全蛋摄入量的多少不会影响 CVD 危险因素,而且与全蛋相比,中老年人食用蛋替代品可能对降低 CVD 风险也有益。