Suppr超能文献

近期自杀风险评估:关于保护因素临床相关性的评论

Near Term Suicide Risk Assessment: A Commentary on the Clinical Relevance of Protective Factors.

作者信息

Berman Alan L, Silverman Morton M

出版信息

Arch Suicide Res. 2020;24(sup2):S370-S380. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2019.1612804. Epub 2019 Jun 14.

Abstract

In this article we examine the clinical relevance of protective factors to the assessment and formulation of near-term risk of death by suicide. Contrary to current clinical belief and practice, we posit that there is no evidence base to support these factors as mitigating or buffering risk for suicide for the individual patient, especially in the near-term assessment of that suicide risk. We show that evidence-based protective factors derive from population-based studies and, applicably, have relevance to public health promotion/primary prevention and are significant in informing treatment/secondary prevention, but they lack evidence to support their often-proposed role in mitigating or buffering risk for suicide on an individual basis, especially when applied to the assessment of near-term risk of suicide. Accordingly, we argue for the need for empirical study of the role protective factors may or may not play in the formulation of a patient's risk for suicide and, in the interim, for clinical caution in assuming that protective factors have any significant buffering effect on a patient's level of near-term risk.

摘要

在本文中,我们探讨保护因素与评估及制定近期自杀死亡风险的临床相关性。与当前临床观点和实践相反,我们认为没有证据支持这些因素可减轻或缓冲个体患者的自杀风险,尤其是在对该自杀风险进行近期评估时。我们表明,基于证据的保护因素源自基于人群的研究,适用于公共卫生促进/一级预防,并且在指导治疗/二级预防方面具有重要意义,但它们缺乏证据支持其通常所主张的在个体层面减轻或缓冲自杀风险的作用,特别是在应用于评估近期自杀风险时。因此,我们主张有必要对保护因素在制定患者自杀风险中可能发挥或不发挥作用进行实证研究,并且在此期间临床应谨慎假设保护因素对患者近期风险水平具有任何显著的缓冲作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验