1 Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
2 Pace University, New York, NY, USA.
Am J Mens Health. 2019 May-Jun;13(3):1557988319850052. doi: 10.1177/1557988319850052.
In this study, we conducted interviews with 12 working-class men employed in industrial and manual labor to identify their constructions of help-seeking in response to feeling depressed or sad. The semistructured interview format explored participant men's understanding and reactions to depression or sadness, their experiences of depression and reluctance to seek help, and their own and others' reactions to seeking help for feeling depressed or sad. Utilizing the consensual qualitative research methodology, four domains emerged: Concern About Threat and Stigma, Being a Man Means Not Seeking Help, Experiences of Safety and Relief, and Conditions That Reduce Threat and Stigma. The results suggest the need to account for men's experiences of both negative influences (e.g., masculinity injunctions, stigma, and threat to manhood status), as well as adaptive influences (e.g., contexts that reduce stigma) when addressing men's help-seeking for depression and sadness. The domains are illustrative of several theoretical frameworks including social-psychological models of social norms and stigma, precarious manhood theory, inclusive masculinity theory, as well as convergence with other research examining working-class men. Implications are discussed for outreach and practice addressing men's depression and help-seeking.
在这项研究中,我们采访了 12 名从事工业和体力劳动的工人阶级男性,以了解他们在感到沮丧或悲伤时寻求帮助的建构。半结构化访谈形式探讨了参与者对抑郁或悲伤的理解和反应、他们的抑郁经历和不愿寻求帮助、以及他们自己和他人对寻求帮助以缓解抑郁或悲伤的反应。利用共识定性研究方法,出现了四个领域:对威胁和耻辱的关注、作为男人意味着不寻求帮助、安全和缓解的体验,以及减少威胁和耻辱的条件。研究结果表明,在解决男性对抑郁和悲伤的求助问题时,需要考虑到男性的负面经历(例如,男性气质的规范、耻辱和对男子汉地位的威胁),以及适应的经历(例如,减少耻辱的背景)。这些领域说明了几个理论框架,包括社会规范和耻辱的社会心理学模型、脆弱男子汉理论、包容性男子气概理论,以及与其他研究工作阶级男性的研究的融合。讨论了针对男性抑郁和求助的外展和实践的意义。