Dalle Ave Anne L, Sulmasy Daniel P, Bernat James L
Ethics Unit, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue Du Bugnon 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University Medical Center 1, Rue Michel-Servet, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Mar;23(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09904-8.
The dead donor rule (DDR) originally stated that organ donors must not be killed by and for organ donation. Scholars later added the requirement that vital organs should not be procured before death. Some now argue that the DDR is breached in donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) programs. DCDD programs do not breach the original version of the DDR because vital organs are procured only after circulation has ceased permanently as a consequence of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. We hold that the original rendition of the DDR banning killing by and for organ donation is the fundamental norm that should be maintained in transplantation ethics. We propose separating the DDR from two other fundamental normative rules: the duties to prevent harm and to obtain informed consent.
死亡捐献者规则(DDR)最初规定,器官捐献者不得因器官捐献而被杀害。学者们后来补充了一项要求,即重要器官不得在死亡前获取。现在有人认为,在循环判定死亡后器官捐献(DCDD)项目中违反了DDR。DCDD项目并未违反DDR的原始版本,因为重要器官仅在因撤除维持生命治疗而导致循环永久停止后才被获取。我们认为,DDR禁止因器官捐献而杀人的原始表述是移植伦理中应予以维持的基本规范。我们建议将DDR与另外两项基本规范规则区分开来:预防伤害的义务和获得知情同意的义务。