• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交际性指向中的受指者设计。

Recipient Design in Communicative Pointing.

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University.

Erasmus Research Institute of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2019 May;43(5):e12733. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12733.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.12733
PMID:31087589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6594194/
Abstract

A long-standing debate in the study of human communication centers on the degree to which communicators tune their communicative signals (e.g., speech, gestures) for specific addressees, as opposed to taking a neutral or egocentric perspective. This tuning, called recipient design, is known to occur under special conditions (e.g., when errors in communication need to be corrected), but several researchers have argued that it is not an intrinsic feature of human communication, because that would be computationally too demanding. In this study, we contribute to this debate by studying a simple communicative behavior, communicative pointing, under conditions of successful (error-free) communication. Using an information-theoretic measure, called legibility, we present evidence of recipient design in communicative pointing. The legibility effect is present early in the movement, suggesting that it is an intrinsic part of the communicative plan. Moreover, it is reliable only from the viewpoint of the addressee, suggesting that the motor plan is tuned to the addressee. These findings suggest that recipient design is an intrinsic feature of human communication.

摘要

在人类交流研究中,一个长期存在的争论焦点是交流者在多大程度上根据特定的对象来调整他们的交流信号(例如,言语、手势),而不是采取中立或自我中心的视角。这种被称为接收者设计的调整,已知会在特殊条件下发生(例如,当需要纠正沟通中的错误时),但一些研究人员认为它不是人类交流的固有特征,因为这在计算上要求太高。在这项研究中,我们通过研究在成功(无错误)沟通条件下的一种简单交流行为——交际性指点,为这场争论做出了贡献。我们使用一种信息论度量,称为易读性,为交际性指点中的接收者设计提供了证据。易读性效应在运动的早期就出现了,这表明它是交流计划的内在组成部分。此外,它只有从接收者的角度来看才是可靠的,这表明运动计划是针对接收者进行调整的。这些发现表明,接收者设计是人类交流的固有特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9d/6594194/6a267b432c20/COGS-43-na-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9d/6594194/c4e325a88662/COGS-43-na-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9d/6594194/121739e376af/COGS-43-na-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9d/6594194/2e8990f0a690/COGS-43-na-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9d/6594194/6a267b432c20/COGS-43-na-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9d/6594194/c4e325a88662/COGS-43-na-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9d/6594194/121739e376af/COGS-43-na-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9d/6594194/2e8990f0a690/COGS-43-na-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9d/6594194/6a267b432c20/COGS-43-na-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Recipient Design in Communicative Pointing.交际性指向中的受指者设计。
Cogn Sci. 2019 May;43(5):e12733. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12733.
2
Recipient design in human communication: simple heuristics or perspective taking?人际交流中的受话者设计:简单启发式还是观点采择?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Sep 25;6:253. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00253. eCollection 2012.
3
Hierarchical Integration of Communicative and Spatial Perspective-Taking Demands in Sensorimotor Control of Referential Pointing.参照点指示的感知运动控制中交际和空间视角-taking 需求的分层整合。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan;46(1):e13084. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13084.
4
Electrophysiological and Kinematic Correlates of Communicative Intent in the Planning and Production of Pointing Gestures and Speech.指示性手势和言语的计划与产生过程中交际意图的电生理及运动学关联
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Dec;27(12):2352-68. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00865. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
Communicative intent modulates production and comprehension of actions and gestures: A Kinect study.交际意图调节动作和手势的产生和理解:一项 Kinect 研究。
Cognition. 2018 Nov;180:38-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
6
Hand preferences in human adults: non-communicative actions versus communicative gestures.成人的手偏好:非交流性动作与交流性手势。
Cortex. 2012 Sep;48(8):1017-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.03.016. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
7
Context-sensitive adjustment of pointing in great apes.灵长类动物的指向动作的上下文敏感调整。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 23;10(1):1048. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56183-7.
8
When to Take a Gesture Seriously: On How We Use and Prioritize Communicative Cues.何时应认真对待一个手势:关于我们如何使用和优先考虑交际线索
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Aug;29(8):1355-1367. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01125. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
9
Behavioral and neural correlates of communication via pointing.通过指点进行交流的行为和神经关联。
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 15;6(3):e17719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017719.
10
The development of pointing perception in infancy: effects of communicative signals on covert shifts of attention.婴儿指向知觉的发展:交际信号对隐蔽注意转移的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Oct;49(10):1898-908. doi: 10.1037/a0031111. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Space-time mapping relationships in sensorimotor communication during asymmetric joint action.在非对称关节活动中进行感觉运动交流时的时空映射关系。
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 12;12:e16764. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16764. eCollection 2024.
2
A multi-scale investigation of the human communication system's response to visual disruption.对人类通信系统对视觉干扰反应的多尺度研究。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Apr 13;9(4):211489. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211489. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Intra-individual behavioural and neural signatures of audience effects and interactions in a mirror-game paradigm.

本文引用的文献

1
Communicative knowledge pervasively influences sensorimotor computations.交际知识普遍影响着感觉运动计算。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 27;7(1):4268. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04442-w.
2
Electrophysiological and Kinematic Correlates of Communicative Intent in the Planning and Production of Pointing Gestures and Speech.指示性手势和言语的计划与产生过程中交际意图的电生理及运动学关联
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Dec;27(12):2352-68. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00865. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
3
Electrophysiological evidence for the role of shared space in online comprehension of spatial demonstratives.
镜像游戏范式中观众效应及互动的个体内行为和神经特征
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Feb 16;9(2):211352. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211352. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Hierarchical Integration of Communicative and Spatial Perspective-Taking Demands in Sensorimotor Control of Referential Pointing.参照点指示的感知运动控制中交际和空间视角-taking 需求的分层整合。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan;46(1):e13084. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13084.
5
A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference.指示参照研究的概念框架。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):409-433. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01822-8. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
6
Social and ecological complexity is associated with gestural repertoire size of wild chimpanzees.社会和生态复杂性与野生黑猩猩的手势 repertoire 大小相关。 (注:“repertoire”直译为“全部剧目;全部技能;全部本领”,这里可能需要结合上下文进一步准确理解其在该语境下的意思,比如可意译为“丰富程度”等使译文更通顺自然,但按要求未做意译修改。 )
Integr Zool. 2020 Jul;15(4):276-292. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12423. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
共享空间在空间指示语在线理解中作用的电生理证据。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:64-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
4
Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes.视觉和空间视角-taking 过程的异同。
Cognition. 2013 Nov;129(2):426-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
5
Recipient design in human communication: simple heuristics or perspective taking?人际交流中的受话者设计:简单启发式还是观点采择?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Sep 25;6:253. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00253. eCollection 2012.
6
Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games.预测语言游戏中的语用推理。
Science. 2012 May 25;336(6084):998. doi: 10.1126/science.1218633.
7
Intentional communication: computationally easy or difficult?有意交流:计算上是简单还是困难?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Jun 30;5:52. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00052. eCollection 2011.
8
Making oneself predictable: reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination.使自己具有可预测性:降低时间变异性有助于协调联合动作。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):517-30. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2706-z. Epub 2011 May 10.
9
Behavioral and neural correlates of communication via pointing.通过指点进行交流的行为和神经关联。
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 15;6(3):e17719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017719.
10
Recipient design in tacit communication.隐性沟通中的接受者设计。
Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.004. Epub 2009 Feb 7.