• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人危重症患者新发心房颤动:范围综述。

New-onset atrial fibrillation in adult critically ill patients: a scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jul;45(7):928-938. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05633-x. Epub 2019 May 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-019-05633-x
PMID:31089761
Abstract

PURPOSE

New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is common and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, its clinical importance and management in critically ill patients are not well described. The aim of this scoping review is to assess the epidemiology and management strategies of NOAF during critical illness.

METHOD

The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for studies assessing the incidence, outcome and management strategies of NOAF in adult critically ill patients. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

A total of 99 studies were included, of which 79 were observational and 20 were interventional. The incidence of NOAF varied from 1.7% to 43.9% with considerable inter-population variation (very low quality of evidence). Commonly identified risk factors for NOAF included higher age, cardiovascular comorbidities and sepsis. The occurrence of NOAF was associated with adverse outcomes, including stroke, prolonged length of stay and mortality (very low quality of evidence). We found limited data on the optimal management strategy with no evidence for firm benefit or harm for any intervention (very low/low quality of evidence).

CONCLUSIONS

The definition and incidence of NOAF in critically ill patients varied considerably and many risk factors were identified. NOAF seemed to be associated with adverse outcomes, but data were very limited and current management strategies are not evidence-based.

摘要

目的

新发心房颤动(NOAF)较为常见,与发病率和死亡率增加相关。然而,危重病患者中其临床重要性和管理尚未得到很好的描述。本综述的目的是评估危重病患者中 NOAF 的流行病学和管理策略。

方法

本综述按照 PRISMA 扩展范围审查进行。我们检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆中评估成人危重病患者中 NOAF 的发生率、结局和管理策略的研究。使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法评估证据质量。

结果

共纳入 99 项研究,其中 79 项为观察性研究,20 项为干预性研究。NOAF 的发生率为 1.7%至 43.9%,存在相当大的人群差异(极低质量证据)。常见的 NOAF 危险因素包括年龄较大、心血管合并症和脓毒症。NOAF 的发生与不良结局相关,包括卒中、住院时间延长和死亡率(极低质量证据)。我们发现关于最佳管理策略的数据有限,任何干预措施均无确凿的获益或危害证据(极低/低质量证据)。

结论

危重病患者中 NOAF 的定义和发生率差异较大,且确定了许多危险因素。NOAF 似乎与不良结局相关,但数据非常有限,目前的管理策略没有循证依据。

相似文献

1
New-onset atrial fibrillation in adult critically ill patients: a scoping review.成人危重症患者新发心房颤动:范围综述。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jul;45(7):928-938. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05633-x. Epub 2019 May 14.
2
New-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill adult patients-an SSAI clinical practice guideline.危重症成年患者新发心房颤动-SSAI 临床实践指南。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Sep;67(8):1110-1117. doi: 10.1111/aas.14262. Epub 2023 May 24.
3
Treatment strategies for new onset atrial fibrillation in patients treated on an intensive care unit: a systematic scoping review.重症监护病房中新发心房颤动患者的治疗策略:系统范围综述。
Crit Care. 2021 Jul 21;25(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03684-5.
4
Study protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the influence of coagulopathy and immune activation on new onset atrial fibrillation in patients with sepsis.研究方案:关于凝血功能障碍和免疫激活对脓毒症患者新发心房颤动影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0290963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290963. eCollection 2023.
5
Beyond the Beat: A Multifaceted Review of Atrial Fibrillation in Sepsis: Risk Factors, Management Strategies, and Economic Impact.超越节律:脓毒症中心房颤动的多方面综述:危险因素、管理策略及经济影响
Cardiol Res. 2025 Feb;16(1):1-14. doi: 10.14740/cr1723. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
6
New-onset atrial fibrillation and associated outcomes and resource use among critically ill adults-a multicenter retrospective cohort study.新发心房颤动与危重症成年患者相关结局及资源利用:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2020 Jan 13;24(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2730-0.
7
New-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill acute kidney injury patients on renal replacement therapy.重症急性肾损伤行肾脏替代治疗患者新发心房颤动。
Europace. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):211-217. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab163.
8
New-onset atrial fibrillation in the intensive care unit: Protocol for an international inception cohort study (AFIB-ICU).重症监护病房新发心房颤动:一项国际起始队列研究(AFIB-ICU)方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Jul;65(6):846-851. doi: 10.1111/aas.13827. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
9
Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Mortality of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients.机械通气的危重症患者新发房颤的患病率、危险因素及死亡率
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 9;13(22):6750. doi: 10.3390/jcm13226750.
10
Joint association of the triglyceride-glucose index and stress hyperglycemia ratio with incidence and mortality risks of new-onset atrial fibrillation during sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与应激性高血糖比率联合与脓毒症期间新发心房颤动的发病率和死亡率风险:一项回顾性队列研究
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Apr 2;24(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02709-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing clinical prediction model for new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patient: Based on machine learning.优化危重症患者新发房颤的临床预测模型:基于机器学习
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 11;20(9):e0331857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331857. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of rhythm and rate control medications for new-onset atrial fibrillation in septic patients: MIMIC-IV database analysis.脓毒症患者新发房颤的节律控制与心率控制药物比较:MIMIC-IV数据库分析
J Transl Med. 2025 May 7;23(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06380-y.
3
Atrial fibrillation in critical illness: state of the art.

本文引用的文献

1
Atrial fibrillation detected initially during acute medical illness: A systematic review.急性疾病期间首次检测到的心房颤动:系统评价。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Mar;8(2):130-141. doi: 10.1177/2048872618799748. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
2
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Risk of thromboembolism in patients developing critical illness-associated atrial fibrillation.
危重症中的心房颤动:最新进展
Intensive Care Med. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07895-0.
4
A systematic review on the influence of coagulopathy and immune activation on New Onset Atrial Fibrillation in patients with sepsis.关于凝血功能障碍和免疫激活对脓毒症患者新发心房颤动影响的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 29;20(1):e0318365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318365. eCollection 2025.
5
Impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者新发心房颤动的影响
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec 11. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01941-5.
6
Research priorities for the study of atrial fibrillation during acute and critical illness: recommendations from the Symposium on Atrial Fibrillation in Acute and Critical Care.急性和危重症期间心房颤动研究的优先事项:急性和危重症护理中心房颤动研讨会的建议
BMC Proc. 2024 Nov 5;18(Suppl 22):23. doi: 10.1186/s12919-024-00309-x.
7
Interpretable machine learning model for new-onset atrial fibrillation prediction in critically ill patients: a multi-center study.用于预测危重症患者新发心房颤动的可解释机器学习模型:一项多中心研究。
Crit Care. 2024 Oct 29;28(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05138-0.
8
Association between stress hyperglycemia ratio index and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study using the MIMIC-IV database.基于 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性研究:危重症房颤患者应激性高血糖比值指数与全因死亡率的相关性。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Oct 14;23(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02462-1.
9
Development of an Extended Cardiovascular SOFA Score Component Reflecting Cardiac Dysfunction with Improved Survival Prediction in Sepsis: An Exploratory Analysis in the Sepsis and Elevated Troponin (SET) Study.开发一个反映心脏功能障碍的扩展心血管序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分组件,以改善脓毒症患者生存预测:脓毒症与肌钙蛋白升高(SET)研究中的探索性分析
J Intensive Care Med. 2025 Mar;40(3):320-330. doi: 10.1177/08850666241282294. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
10
Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy Score is Associated with an Increased Risk of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Septic Patients: A Two-Centered Retrospective Study.脓毒症诱导的凝血病评分与脓毒症患者新发心房颤动风险增加相关:一项双中心回顾性研究
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Aug 30;17:5889-5899. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S467424. eCollection 2024.
危重病相关房颤患者的血栓栓塞风险。
Clin Med (Lond). 2018 Aug;18(4):282-287. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-4-282.
4
Predictors for sustained new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a retrospective observational study.危重症患者新发持续性心房颤动的预测因素:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Anesth. 2018 Oct;32(5):681-687. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2537-1. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
5
Impact and treatment success of new-onset atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rate development in the surgical intensive care unit.外科重症监护病房新发快速心室率心房颤动的影响及治疗效果
J Surg Res. 2018 Sep;229:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
6
New-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients and its association with mortality: A report from the FROG-ICU study.危重症患者新发心房颤动及其与死亡率的关系:来自 FROG-ICU 研究的报告。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 1;266:95-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.051.
7
Atrial Fibrillation in the ICU.重症监护病房中的心房颤动。
Chest. 2018 Dec;154(6):1424-1434. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.03.040. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
8
The impact of sustained new-onset atrial fibrillation on mortality and stroke incidence in critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study.持续新发心房颤动对危重症患者死亡率和卒中发生率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:267-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.11.040. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
9
Non-antiarrhythmic interventions in new onset and paroxysmal sepsis-related atrial fibrillation.新发及阵发性脓毒症相关性心房颤动的非抗心律失常干预措施
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jan;44(1):94-97. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4986-7. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
10
New-onset atrial fibrillation and clinical outcome in non-cardiac intensive care unit patients.非心脏重症监护病房患者新发心房颤动与临床结局。
Aust Crit Care. 2018 Sep;31(5):274-277. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 26.