Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 16;19(8):e0308956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308956. eCollection 2024.
Measuring rate of torque development (RTD) and peak torque (PT) for hip muscle performance presents challenges in clinical practice. This study investigated the construct validity of a handheld dynamometer (HHD) versus an isokinetic dynamometer (IKD), and intra-rater repeated reliability for RTD and PT and their relationship in hip joint movements.
Thirty healthy individuals (mean age = 30 ± 8 years, 13 males) underwent two test sessions in a single day. RTD (0-50, 0-100, 0-150, 0-200ms) and PT normalised to body mass in maximal voluntary isometric contractions were measured using a HHD and an IKD in hip flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation.
For validity between the devices, RTD0-50 exhibited the largest significant systematic bias in all hip movements (3.41-11.99 Nm·s-1 kg-1) and widest limits-of-agreement, while RTD0-200 had the lowest bias (-1.33-3.99 Nm·s-1 kg-1) and narrowest limits-of-agreement. For PT, agreement between dynamometers was observed for hip flexion (0.08 Nm·kg-1), abduction (-0.09 Nm·kg-1), internal (-0.01 Nm·kg-1), and external rotation (0.05 Nm·kg-1). For reliability, intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) ranged from moderate to good in RTD0-50 and RTD0-100 (0.5-0.88), and good to excellent in RTD0-150 and RTD0-200 (0.87-0.95) in all movements. The HHD displayed excellent intra-rater, relative reliability values (ICC2,1) in all movements (0.85-0.95). Pearson's correlation revealed good linear correlation between PT and RTD0-150 and RTD0-200 in all movements (r = .7 to .87, p = < .001).
Validity analysis demonstrated significant systematic bias and lack of agreement in RTD measures between the HHD and IKD. However, the HHD displays excellent to moderate intra-rater, relative reliability for RTD and PT measures in hip movements. Clinicians may use the HHD for hip muscle PT assessment but note, late phase RTD measures are more reliable, valid, and relate to PT than early phase RTD. Additionally, the correlation between RTD and PT at various time epochs was examined to better understand the relationship between these measures.
测量髋关节肌肉性能的扭矩发展速率(RTD)和峰值扭矩(PT)在临床实践中存在挑战。本研究旨在探究手持测力计(HHD)与等速测力计(IKD)的结构效度,并评估在髋关节运动中 RTD 和 PT 的内部测试者重复性可靠性及其相关性。
30 名健康个体(平均年龄=30±8 岁,13 名男性)在一天内进行了两次测试。使用 HHD 和 IKD 在髋关节屈曲、伸展、外展、内收、内旋和外旋中测量最大自主等长收缩时的 RTD(0-50、0-100、0-150、0-200ms)和标准化至体重的 PT。
在设备间的有效性方面,在所有髋关节运动中,RTD0-50 显示出最大的系统偏差(3.41-11.99 Nm·s-1 kg-1)和最宽的容许限,而 RTD0-200 的偏差最小(-1.33-3.99 Nm·s-1 kg-1)和最窄的容许限。对于 PT,在髋关节屈曲(0.08 Nm·kg-1)、外展(-0.09 Nm·kg-1)、内旋(-0.01 Nm·kg-1)和外旋(0.05 Nm·kg-1)方面,测力计之间存在一致性。对于可靠性,在所有运动中,RTD0-50 和 RTD0-100 的内部测试者组内相关系数(ICC2,1)范围为中度至良好(0.5-0.88),RTD0-150 和 RTD0-200 的范围为良好至优秀(0.87-0.95)。在所有运动中,HHD 均显示出出色的内部测试者相对可靠性值(ICC2,1)(0.85-0.95)。皮尔逊相关性分析表明,在所有运动中,PT 与 RTD0-150 和 RTD0-200 之间存在良好的线性相关性(r=.7 至.87,p<.001)。
有效性分析表明,HHD 和 IKD 之间的 RTD 测量存在显著的系统偏差和缺乏一致性。然而,HHD 在髋关节运动中显示出出色的至中度的内部测试者相对可靠性,适用于 RTD 和 PT 测量。临床医生可以使用 HHD 进行髋关节肌肉 PT 评估,但请注意,与早期 RTD 相比,后期 RTD 测量更可靠、更有效且与 PT 相关。此外,还检查了不同时间点 RTD 和 PT 之间的相关性,以更好地理解这些测量之间的关系。