Davis Jennifer N, Greer William, Banks Ron E, Philips Blythe H, Marx James O
Office of Animal Welfare, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Division of Comparative Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Services Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2019 Jul 1;58(4):469-474. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000132. Epub 2019 May 15.
Federal regulations and policies require institutions to establish procedures for ongoing IACUC oversight of approved animal care and use program activities including animal procedures. To fulfill these requirements, research institutions implement postapproval monitoring (PAM) programs designed to assure compliance in animal activities. Although several references commenting on the requirement to conduct PAM are available, few publications discuss actual best practices for accomplishing PAM. Here we use information collected through a survey of large academic research institutions to identify common practices for conducting PAM reviews. Many similarities and differences exist between institutions, which may or may not influence the overall quality of an institution's PAM program.
联邦法规和政策要求各机构建立程序,以便对包括动物实验程序在内的已批准动物护理和使用计划活动进行持续的机构动物护理和使用委员会(IACUC)监督。为满足这些要求,研究机构实施了旨在确保动物活动合规性的批准后监测(PAM)计划。尽管有几篇参考文献对进行PAM的要求进行了评论,但很少有出版物讨论完成PAM的实际最佳做法。在这里,我们利用通过对大型学术研究机构的调查收集到的信息,来确定进行PAM审查的常见做法。各机构之间存在许多异同之处,这可能会也可能不会影响机构PAM计划的整体质量。