• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冻结效应:运动中的物体比处于静止状态的物体更具美感。

The Frozen Effect: Objects in motion are more aesthetically appealing than objects frozen in time.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, United States of America.

Department of Psychology, Rhodes College, Tennessee, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0215813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215813. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0215813
PMID:31095600
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6522023/
Abstract

Videos of moving faces are more flattering than static images of the same face, a phenomenon dubbed the Frozen Face Effect. This may reflect an aesthetic preference for faces viewed in a more ecological context than still photographs. In the current set of experiments, we sought to determine whether this effect is unique to facial processing, or if motion confers an aesthetic benefit to other stimulus categories as well, such as bodies and objects-that is, a more generalized 'Frozen Effect' (FE). If motion were the critical factor in the FE, we would expect the video of a body or object in motion to be significantly more appealing than when seen in individual, static frames. To examine this, we asked participants to rate sets of videos of bodies and objects in motion along with the still frames constituting each video. Extending the original FFE, we found that participants rated videos as significantly more flattering than each video's corresponding still images, regardless of stimulus domain, suggesting that the FFE generalizes well beyond face perception. Interestingly, the magnitude of the FE increased with the predictability of stimulus movement. Our results suggest that observers prefer bodies and objects in motion over the same information presented in static form, and the more predictable the motion, the stronger the preference. Motion imbues objects and bodies with greater aesthetic appeal, which has implications for how one might choose to portray oneself in various social media platforms.

摘要

动态人脸视频比同一人脸的静态图像更具吸引力,这种现象被称为“冻结脸效应”。这可能反映了一种美学偏好,即更喜欢在更具生态意义的环境中观看人脸,而不是静态照片。在当前的一系列实验中,我们试图确定这种效应是否仅存在于面部处理中,或者运动是否也为其他刺激类别(例如身体和物体)带来了美学上的好处,即更普遍的“冻结效应”(FE)。如果运动是 FE 的关键因素,我们预计运动中的身体或物体的视频将比单个静态帧更具吸引力。为了检验这一点,我们要求参与者对运动中的身体和物体的视频集以及构成每个视频的静态帧进行评分。在扩展原始 FFE 的基础上,我们发现无论刺激域如何,参与者都认为视频比每个视频的相应静态图像更具吸引力,这表明 FE 很好地扩展到了面部感知之外。有趣的是,FE 的幅度随着刺激运动的可预测性而增加。我们的结果表明,观察者更喜欢运动中的身体和物体,而不是以静态形式呈现的相同信息,而且运动的可预测性越强,偏好就越强。运动赋予物体和身体更大的美感,这对人们如何在各种社交媒体平台上选择自我呈现方式具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
The Frozen Effect: Objects in motion are more aesthetically appealing than objects frozen in time.冻结效应:运动中的物体比处于静止状态的物体更具美感。
PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0215813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215813. eCollection 2019.
2
The frozen face effect: why static photographs may not do you justice.冻结脸效应:为何静态照片可能无法真实展现你
Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 20;3:22. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00022. eCollection 2012.
3
Modulation of the face- and body-selective visual regions by the motion and emotion of point-light face and body stimuli.通过光点脸和身体刺激的运动和情绪来调制面孔和身体选择性视觉区域。
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1700-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.073. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
4
Dynamic stimuli: accentuating aesthetic preference biases.动态刺激:强调审美偏好偏见。
Laterality. 2014;19(5):549-59. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2014.886585. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
5
From Visual Perception to Aesthetic Appeal: Brain Responses to Aesthetically Appealing Natural Landscape Movies.从视觉感知到审美吸引力:大脑对具有审美吸引力的自然景观电影的反应。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jul 21;15:676032. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.676032. eCollection 2021.
6
When seeing depends on knowing: adults with Autism Spectrum Conditions show diminished top-down processes in the visual perception of degraded faces but not degraded objects.当所见取决于所知:自闭症谱系障碍的成年人在观看退化人脸时表现出自上而下加工过程减弱,但观看退化物体时则不然。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Apr;48(5):1227-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.023. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
7
Learning the moves: the effect of familiarity and facial motion on person recognition across large changes in viewing format.学习识别技巧:熟悉度和面部运动对跨观看格式大幅变化的人物识别的影响。
Perception. 2006;35(6):761-73. doi: 10.1068/p5503.
8
Facial esthetics and the assignment of personality traits before and after orthognathic surgery rated on video clips.通过视频片段对正颌手术前后的面部美学及人格特质赋值进行评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0191718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191718. eCollection 2018.
9
Recognizing people from dynamic and static faces and bodies: dissecting identity with a fusion approach.通过动态和静态的面部及身体特征识别人员:采用融合方法剖析身份信息。
Vision Res. 2011 Jan;51(1):74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.035. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
10
Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of position and direction on framing single objects.空间构图中的美学问题:位置和方向对单个物体取景的影响。
Spat Vis. 2008;21(3-5):421-49. doi: 10.1163/156856808784532662.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the motion advantage: evaluating the contribution of familiarity and differences in facial motion.探索运动优势:评估面部运动中熟悉度和差异的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 May;70(5):919-929. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1138974. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
2
Eye tracking reveals a crucial role for facial motion in recognition of faces by infants.眼动追踪揭示了面部运动在婴儿识别面孔中起着关键作用。
Dev Psychol. 2015 Jun;51(6):744-57. doi: 10.1037/dev0000019.
3
On the facilitative effects of face motion on face recognition and its development.
论面部运动对面部识别及其发展的促进作用。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 24;5:633. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00633. eCollection 2014.
4
Eye of the beholder: Symmetry perception in social judgments based on whole body displays.旁观者之眼:基于全身展示的社会判断中的对称性感知。
Iperception. 2012;3(7):398-409. doi: 10.1068/i0495sas. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
5
"What women like": influence of motion and form on esthetic body perception.《女性之所好:运动与形态对身体美感认知的影响》
Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 9;3:235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00235. eCollection 2012.
6
An algorithmic method for functionally defining regions of interest in the ventral visual pathway.一种用于在腹侧视觉通路上对感兴趣区域进行功能定义的算法方法。
Neuroimage. 2012 May 1;60(4):2357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.055. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
7
The frozen face effect: why static photographs may not do you justice.冻结脸效应:为何静态照片可能无法真实展现你
Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 20;3:22. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00022. eCollection 2012.
8
Facial attractiveness ratings from video-clips and static images tell the same story.从视频片段和静态图像得出的面部吸引力评分结果是一致的。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026653. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
9
Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions.在对面孔选择性皮质区域中,动态信息与静态信息的选择性差异。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 15;56(4):2356-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.067. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
10
Recognizing people from dynamic and static faces and bodies: dissecting identity with a fusion approach.通过动态和静态的面部及身体特征识别人员:采用融合方法剖析身份信息。
Vision Res. 2011 Jan;51(1):74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.035. Epub 2010 Oct 20.