• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the Korean version of the medication regimen complexity index.《药物治疗方案复杂性指数韩国版的制定与验证》。
PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0216805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216805. eCollection 2019.
2
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Medication Regimen Complexity Index Adapted to Spanish.适用于西班牙语的药物治疗方案复杂性指数的跨文化适应与验证
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Nov;50(11):918-925. doi: 10.1177/1060028016656385. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
3
Development and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI-D).《 Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI-D)德语版的编制与心理计量学评估》
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Jun;18(3):515-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01636.x. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
4
Development and validation of the medication regimen complexity index.药物治疗方案复杂性指数的开发与验证。
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Sep;38(9):1369-76. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D479. Epub 2004 Jul 20.
5
Translation and validation into Portuguese language of the medication regimen complexity index.药物治疗方案复杂性指数的葡萄牙语翻译与验证。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007 Oct;89(4):210-8. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2007001600001.
6
Validation of a patient-level medication regimen complexity index as a possible tool to identify patients for medication therapy management intervention.验证患者层面药物治疗方案复杂性指数作为识别适合药物治疗管理干预患者的一种可能工具。
Pharmacotherapy. 2014 Aug;34(8):826-35. doi: 10.1002/phar.1452. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the quality of life assessment in spina bifida for children (QUALAS-C-K).儿童脊柱裂生活质量评估韩文版(QUALAS-C-K)的跨文化适应与验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 May;46(9):1898-1903. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2207222. Epub 2023 May 8.
8
Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.新版膝关节协会膝关节评分系统韩文版的跨文化调适与验证
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jun;475(6):1629-1639. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5307-8. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
9
Development of medication regimen complexity index: Japanese version and application in elderly patients.药物治疗方案复杂指数的制定:日本版及其在老年患者中的应用。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Aug;43(4):858-863. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01185-z. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
10
Validation and standardization of the Brazilian version of the Medication Regimen Complexity Index for older adults in primary care.验证和标准化巴西版老年人初级保健药物治疗方案复杂指数。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Jun;18(6):853-859. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13261. Epub 2018 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification and evaluation of drug-related problems in community pharmacy in Turkey: a descriptive prevalence study.土耳其社区药房中药物相关问题的识别与评估:一项描述性患病率研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Aug 7;26(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02926-7.
2
Effect of Multi-Dose Dispensing on Medication Regimen Complexity: A Real-World Study.多剂量配药对药物治疗方案复杂性的影响:一项真实世界研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 20;13(5):1205. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051205.
3
Effect of Pharmacist-Led Intervention in Elderly Patients through a Comprehensive Medication Reconciliation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.药师主导的综合药物重整对老年患者的干预效果:一项随机临床试验。
Yonsei Med J. 2023 May;64(5):336-343. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.0620.
4
Association between medication regimen complexity and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者药物治疗方案的复杂性与血糖控制之间的关系。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 May-Jun;63(3):769-777. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.12.028. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
5
A Study on Types of Medication Adherence in Hypertension among Older Patients and Influencing Factors.老年高血压患者用药依从性类型及影响因素研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 20;10(11):2322. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112322.
6
Evaluating the Medication Regimen Complexity Score as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in the Critically Ill.评估药物治疗方案复杂性评分作为危重症患者临床结局预测指标的研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 11;11(16):4705. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164705.

本文引用的文献

1
Medication Regimen Complexity Measured by MRCI: A Systematic Review to Identify Health Outcomes.用药方案复杂性测量工具 MRCI:一项系统评价以识别健康结局
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Nov;52(11):1117-1134. doi: 10.1177/1060028018773691. Epub 2018 May 13.
2
SImplification of Medications Prescribed to Long-tErm care Residents (SIMPLER): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.长期护理居民处方药物简化(SIMPLER):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jan 12;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2417-2.
3
Association between medication regimen complexity and pharmacotherapy adherence: a systematic review.药物治疗方案复杂性与药物治疗依从性之间的关联:一项系统综述
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;73(11):1475-1489. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2315-2. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
4
Medication regimen complexity and prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines in older patients after hospitalisation.住院老年患者的药物治疗方案复杂性及潜在不适当用药的发生率
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Aug;39(4):867-873. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0490-y. Epub 2017 May 26.
5
Clinical Outcomes Associated with Medication Regimen Complexity in Older People: A Systematic Review.老年人药物治疗方案复杂性与临床结局的关联:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Apr;65(4):747-753. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14682. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
6
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Medication Regimen Complexity Index Adapted to Spanish.适用于西班牙语的药物治疗方案复杂性指数的跨文化适应与验证
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Nov;50(11):918-925. doi: 10.1177/1060028016656385. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
7
Evaluating Patient-Level Medication Regimen Complexity Over Time in Heart Transplant Recipients.评估心脏移植受者随时间变化的患者层面药物治疗方案复杂性
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Nov;50(11):926-934. doi: 10.1177/1060028016657552. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
8
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
Validation of the Turkish version of medication regimen complexity index among elderly patients.老年患者中土耳其语版药物治疗方案复杂性指数的验证
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Oct;22(5):732-6. doi: 10.1111/jep.12526. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
10
Factors associated with medication regimen complexity in older people: a cross-sectional population-based study.老年人药物治疗方案复杂性的相关因素:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Sep;71(9):1099-108. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1883-2. Epub 2015 Jun 14.

《药物治疗方案复杂性指数韩国版的制定与验证》。

Development and validation of the Korean version of the medication regimen complexity index.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Medicines and Regulatory Science, Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pharmacy, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0216805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216805. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0216805
PMID:31095602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6522044/
Abstract

The medication regimen complexity index (MRCI), originally developed in English, is a reliable and valid tool to assess the complexity of pharmacotherapy. This study aimed to validate the Korean version of MRCI (MRCI-K). A cross-cultural methodological study comprising 335 discharged patients of a tertiary hospital in Korea was conducted. The translation process included translation into Korean by two clinical pharmacists, back translation by two native speakers, and a pretest of the tool, culminating in the Korean version of MRCI-K. Reliability analysis was assessed using inter-rater and test-retest reliability with 25 randomly selected patients. Convergent and discriminant validity analyses were conducted by correlating MRCI scores with medication number, age, sex, adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports, and length of stay. The criterion validity was confirmed through evaluation by a nine-member expert panel that subjectively ranked these regimens. The reliability analysis demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.977), and the intraclass correlation coefficient exceeded 0.90 for all cases. The correlation coefficient for the number of medications was 0.955 (P < 0.001). Weak significant correlations were observed with age and length of stay. The MRCI-K group with ADR reports scored higher (mean, 31.8) than the group without ADR reports (mean, 27.3). The expert panel's ranking had a stronger correlation with the MRCI ranking than the medication number ranking. MRCI-K has similar reliability and validity as MRCI and is useful for analyzing therapeutic regimens with potential applications in both practice and research in Korea.

摘要

药物治疗方案复杂指数(MRCI)最初是用英文开发的,是一种可靠有效的评估药物治疗复杂性的工具。本研究旨在验证韩国版 MRCI(MRCI-K)。这是一项跨文化的方法学研究,包括韩国一家三级医院的 335 名出院患者。翻译过程包括由两名临床药剂师进行韩文翻译、两名以英语为母语的人进行回译以及对工具进行预测试,最终形成了韩文版的 MRCI-K。采用 25 名随机选择的患者评估了评分者间信度和重测信度。通过与药物数量、年龄、性别、药物不良反应(ADR)报告和住院时间相关联,进行了 MRCI 评分的相关性和区分效度分析。通过由 9 名专家组成的小组对这些方案进行主观评分来确认标准效度。可靠性分析显示,内部一致性极好(Cronbach's α = 0.977),所有情况下的组内相关系数均超过 0.90。与药物数量的相关系数为 0.955(P < 0.001)。与年龄和住院时间也存在弱显著相关性。有 ADR 报告的 MRCI-K 组评分较高(均值为 31.8),而无 ADR 报告的组评分较低(均值为 27.3)。专家小组的评分与 MRCI 评分的相关性强于与药物数量评分的相关性。MRCI-K 具有与 MRCI 相似的可靠性和有效性,可用于分析治疗方案,在韩国的实践和研究中具有潜在应用价值。