• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物治疗方案复杂指数的制定:日本版及其在老年患者中的应用。

Development of medication regimen complexity index: Japanese version and application in elderly patients.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, General Practice and Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan.

Department of General Medicine, Tsukuba Central Hospital, Ushiku, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Aug;43(4):858-863. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01185-z. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-020-01185-z
PMID:33136252
Abstract

Background Medication regimen complexity includes various aspects of a regimen, including the dosage form, number of medications and need for additional information for use. Complicated medication regimens cause non-adherence to prescribed medications, making it essential to evaluate medication regimen complexity in older adults to improve adherence to prescribed medications and clinical outcomes. The medication regimen complexity index is currently the most widely used scale for quantifying regimen complexity; however, it has yet to be adopted in Japan. Objective This study aimed to translate the medication regimen complexity index to Japanese and assess its reliability and validity for application in elderly patients in Japan. Setting This study was conducted in a clinic that provides home medical care to patients in the southern part of Ibaraki prefecture, Japan. Method The validation process consisted of translation of the original English version of the medication regimen complexity index to Japanese followed by back-translation to English, comparison of the back-translated and original versions, pilot testing, and assessment of the Japanese version by two raters using the medication regimens of 72 patients with chronic diseases. Main outcome measure The psychometric properties of the index were evaluated according to inter-rater and test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity. Results The mean age of the 72 patients was 84.3 years. The scale showed high inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.946) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.991) for total scores. The number of medications was positively correlated with total medication regimen complexity index score (r = 0.930, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between age, sex and Charlson Comorbidity Index and medication regimen complexity index score (P > 0.05). Conclusions The Japanese version of the medication regimen complexity index is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the complexity of medication regimen in Japanese elderly patients.

摘要

背景 药物治疗方案的复杂性包括方案的各个方面,包括剂型、药物种类和使用所需的额外信息。复杂的药物治疗方案会导致患者不遵医嘱服药,因此评估老年人的药物治疗方案复杂性对于提高患者对医嘱药物的依从性和临床结局至关重要。药物治疗方案复杂性指数是目前用于量化方案复杂性最广泛的量表,但尚未在日本采用。 目的 本研究旨在将药物治疗方案复杂性指数翻译成日语,并评估其在日本老年患者中的可靠性和有效性。 地点 本研究在日本茨城县南部为患者提供家庭医疗护理的诊所进行。 方法 验证过程包括将药物治疗方案复杂性指数的原始英文版本翻译成日语,然后再翻译回英文,比较回译和原文版本,进行预试验,以及由两名评分者使用 72 名慢性病患者的药物治疗方案评估日语版本。 主要结果 该指数的心理测量学特性根据评分者间和重测信度以及收敛和判别效度进行评估。 结果 72 名患者的平均年龄为 84.3 岁。该量表的总分具有较高的评分者间信度(组内相关系数 0.946)和重测信度(组内相关系数 0.991)。药物种类与总药物治疗方案复杂性指数评分呈正相关(r=0.930,P<0.001)。年龄、性别和 Charlson 合并症指数与药物治疗方案复杂性指数评分之间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。 结论 日语版药物治疗方案复杂性指数是评估日本老年患者药物治疗方案复杂性的可靠且有效的工具。

相似文献

1
Development of medication regimen complexity index: Japanese version and application in elderly patients.药物治疗方案复杂指数的制定:日本版及其在老年患者中的应用。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Aug;43(4):858-863. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01185-z. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
2
Development and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI-D).《 Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI-D)德语版的编制与心理计量学评估》
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Jun;18(3):515-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01636.x. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
3
Validation of the Turkish version of medication regimen complexity index among elderly patients.老年患者中土耳其语版药物治疗方案复杂性指数的验证
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Oct;22(5):732-6. doi: 10.1111/jep.12526. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
4
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Medication Regimen Complexity Index Adapted to Spanish.适用于西班牙语的药物治疗方案复杂性指数的跨文化适应与验证
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Nov;50(11):918-925. doi: 10.1177/1060028016656385. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
5
Development and validation of the Korean version of the medication regimen complexity index.《药物治疗方案复杂性指数韩国版的制定与验证》。
PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0216805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216805. eCollection 2019.
6
Translation and validation into Portuguese language of the medication regimen complexity index.药物治疗方案复杂性指数的葡萄牙语翻译与验证。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007 Oct;89(4):210-8. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2007001600001.
7
Looking beyond polypharmacy: quantification of medication regimen complexity in the elderly.超越多重用药:老年人药物治疗方案复杂性的量化
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Aug;10(4):223-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
8
Translation, adaptation and validation of two versions of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire in Malaysian patients for speakers of both English and Malay languages: a cross-sectional study.针对英语和马来语使用者的马来西亚患者,对两个版本的慢性肝病问卷进行翻译、改编及验证:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 25;7(5):e013873. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013873.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of the functional assessment scale for acute hamstring injuries (FASH) questionnaire for French-speaking patients.功能性腘绳肌损伤评估量表(FASH)问卷的跨文化调适、翻译和验证,适用于讲法语的患者。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jul;42(14):2076-2082. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1544669. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷土耳其语版本的跨文化适应、信度和效度
J Orthop Sci. 2016 May;21(3):295-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the efficacy of aromatherapy and complementary yoga on indicators of medication regimen complexity: A retrospective study.芳香疗法和辅助瑜伽对药物治疗方案复杂性指标的疗效评估:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 Aug 19;25(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12906-025-05041-3.
2
Identifying characteristics of patients requiring proactive pharmaceutical interventions in the recovery period and assessing the effect of rehabilitation and drugs: a retrospective study.识别恢复期需要积极药物干预的患者特征并评估康复和药物的效果:一项回顾性研究。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2025 Apr 8;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40780-025-00435-4.
3
Statement on medication simplification in long-term care facilities by the Japanese Society of Geriatric Pharmacy: English translation of the Japanese article.
日本老年药学协会关于长期护理机构用药简化的声明:日文文章的英文翻译
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2025 Jan;25(1):14-24. doi: 10.1111/ggi.15009. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
4
Association between medication regimen complexity and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者药物治疗方案的复杂性与血糖控制之间的关系。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 May-Jun;63(3):769-777. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.12.028. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
5
Analysis of Various Factors Associated With Opioid Dose Escalation in Patients With Cancer Pain.癌症疼痛患者阿片类药物剂量增加相关的各种因素分析。
Cureus. 2022 May 24;14(5):e25266. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25266. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Evaluation of changes in prescription among Japanese elderly patients before and after transition to home care.日本老年患者转为居家护理前后处方变化的评估。
J Gen Fam Med. 2021 Nov 8;23(2):94-100. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.506. eCollection 2022 Mar.