• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Building the business case for quality improvement: a framework for evaluating return on investment.构建质量改进的商业案例:投资回报率评估框架
Future Healthc J. 2018 Jun;5(2):132-137. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-2-132.
2
Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review.识别和理解与大型医疗保健质量改进计划投资回报率相关的收益:综合系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 24;22(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08171-3.
3
How is return on investment from quality improvement programmes conceptualised by mental healthcare leaders and why: a qualitative study.精神卫生保健领导者如何从概念上理解改善项目的投资回报率,以及为什么要这样理解:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):1009. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09911-9.
4
The development of the concept of return-on-investment from large-scale quality improvement programmes in healthcare: an integrative systematic literature review.从医疗保健领域的大规模质量改进计划看投资回报率的概念发展:综合系统文献回顾
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):1492. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08832-3.
5
Improving access to services through a collaborative learning system at East London NHS Foundation Trust.通过东伦敦国民保健服务基金会信托基金的协作学习系统改善服务获取途径。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Jul 30;7(3):e000337. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000337. eCollection 2018.
6
Using practical quality improvement approaches and tools in reproductive health services in east Africa.在东非的生殖健康服务中运用切实可行的质量改进方法和工具。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Nov;25(11):574-87. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30471-0.
7
Quality improvement in forensic mental health: the East London forensic violence reduction collaborative.法医精神卫生领域的质量改进:东伦敦法医暴力减少协作项目
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Sep;9(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000803.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Evaluating investment in quality improvement capacity building: a systematic review.评估质量改进能力建设的投资:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 20;7(2):e012431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012431.
10
Explanation of context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care: the MH-CREST realist evidence synthesis.成人社区心理健康危机护理中的背景、机制和结果解释:MH-CREST 真实证据综合研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(15):1-161. doi: 10.3310/TWKK5110.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring variations in healthcare data using run charts and statistical process control charts: a survey of general physicians attending the quality improvement workshop.使用运行图和统计过程控制图测量医疗保健数据的变化:对参加质量改进研讨会的全科医生的调查
Intern Med J. 2025 Feb;55(2):308-312. doi: 10.1111/imj.16609. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Investigating the impact of a multicomponent positive participatory organisational intervention on burnout in New Zealand emergency department staff: a prospective, multisite, before and after, mixed methods study.调查一项多组分积极参与式组织干预对新西兰急诊科员工职业倦怠的影响:一项前瞻性、多地点、前后对照、混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 29;14(10):e087328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087328.
3
Building lean improvement sckills at scale: an evaluation of a massive open online course in the English NHS.规模化构建精益改进技能:英国国民保健制度大规模开放式在线课程评估。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Oct;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002357.
4
The development of the concept of return-on-investment from large-scale quality improvement programmes in healthcare: an integrative systematic literature review.从医疗保健领域的大规模质量改进计划看投资回报率的概念发展:综合系统文献回顾
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):1492. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08832-3.
5
Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review.识别和理解与大型医疗保健质量改进计划投资回报率相关的收益:综合系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 24;22(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08171-3.
6
Reporting standards, outcomes and costs of quality improvement studies in Ireland: a scoping review.爱尔兰质量改进研究的报告标准、结果和成本:范围综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Jul;10(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001319.
7
Telling the story of complex change: an Impact Framework for the real world.讲述复杂变革的故事:一个适用于现实世界的影响框架。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jul 3;33(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab090.

本文引用的文献

1
Does quality improvement improve quality?质量改进能否提升质量?
Future Hosp J. 2016 Oct;3(3):191-194. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-191.
2
Safer Wards: reducing violence on older people's mental health wards.更安全的病房:减少老年人心理健康病房中的暴力行为
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Jun 9;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u207447.w2977. eCollection 2015.
3
The business case for health-care quality improvement.医疗保健质量改进的商业案例。
J Patient Saf. 2013 Mar;9(1):44-52. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182753e33.

构建质量改进的商业案例:投资回报率评估框架

Building the business case for quality improvement: a framework for evaluating return on investment.

作者信息

Shah Amar, Course Steven

机构信息

East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Future Healthc J. 2018 Jun;5(2):132-137. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-2-132.

DOI:10.7861/futurehosp.5-2-132
PMID:31098548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6502557/
Abstract

There is increasing interest and belief in applying quality improvement (QI) to help solve our most complex challenges in healthcare, yet little published literature to help leaders develop a business case and evaluate return on investment from QI. This is even more pronounced in fields such as mental health and community health services. This paper presents a framework to help identify, understand and evaluate return on investment from large-scale application of QI in healthcare providers. The framework has been developed at East London NHS Foundation Trust (ELFT), a provider of predominantly mental health and community health services to a population of 1.5 million people, which has been undertaking QI at scale since 2014. This paper presents case studies and examples from ELFT to illustrate return on investment from QI at multiple levels: improving outcomes for patients and service users, improving the experience of staff, improving productivity and efficiency, avoiding costs, reducing costs and increasing revenue.

摘要

人们越来越关注并相信应用质量改进(QI)有助于解决医疗保健领域最复杂的挑战,但几乎没有已发表的文献来帮助领导者制定商业案例并评估QI的投资回报率。在心理健康和社区卫生服务等领域,这种情况更为明显。本文提出了一个框架,以帮助识别、理解和评估在医疗保健提供者中大规模应用QI的投资回报率。该框架是由东伦敦国民保健服务基金会信托基金(ELFT)开发的,该信托基金主要为150万人口提供心理健康和社区卫生服务,自2014年以来一直在大规模开展QI。本文介绍了ELFT的案例研究和示例,以说明QI在多个层面的投资回报率:改善患者和服务使用者的结局、改善员工体验、提高生产力和效率、避免成本、降低成本以及增加收入。