Primary Healthcare Centre La Marina, Barcelona, Spain, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.
Primary Healthcare Centre Jaume I, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Catalonia.
BMJ Open. 2019 May 16;9(5):e028159. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028159.
Despite the frequent use of therapies in acute bronchitis, the evidence of their benefit is lacking, since only a few clinical trials have been published, with low sample sizes, poor methodological quality and mainly in children. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of three symptomatic therapies (dextromethorphan, ipratropium or honey) associated with usual care and the usual care in adults with acute bronchitis.
This will be a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, open randomised trial. Patients aged 18 or over with uncomplicated acute bronchitis, with cough for less than 3 weeks as the main symptom, scoring ≥4 in either daytime or nocturnal cough on a 7-point Likert scale, will be randomised to one of the following four groups: usual care, dextromethorphan 30 mg three times a day, ipratropium bromide inhaler 20 µg two puffs three times a day or honey 30 mg (a spoonful) three times a day, all taken for up to 14 days. The exclusion criteria will be pneumonia, criteria for hospital admission, pregnancy or lactation, concomitant pulmonary disease, associated significant comorbidity, allergy, intolerance or contraindication to any of the study drugs or admitted to a long-term residence.
668 patients. The primary outcome will be the number of days with moderate-to-severe cough. All patients will be given a paper-based symptom diary to be self-administered. A second visit will be scheduled at day 2 or 3 for assessing evolution, with two more visits at days 15 and 29 for clinical assessment, evaluation of adverse effects, re-attendance and complications. Patients still with symptoms at day 29 will be called 6 weeks after the baseline visit.
The study has been approved by the Ethical Board of IDIAP Jordi Gol (reference number: AC18/002). The findings of this trial will be disseminated through research conferences and peer-review journals.
NCT03738917; Pre-results.
尽管在急性支气管炎中经常使用治疗方法,但缺乏其疗效的证据,因为仅发表了少数临床试验,这些试验样本量小、方法学质量差,且主要针对儿童。本研究的目的是比较三种对症治疗(右美沙芬、异丙托溴铵或蜂蜜)联合常规治疗与常规治疗成人急性支气管炎的疗效。
这将是一项多中心、实用、平行组、开放随机试验。年龄在 18 岁或以上、无并发症的急性支气管炎患者,以咳嗽为主诉,病程少于 3 周,日间或夜间咳嗽评分≥4 分(7 分制),将随机分为以下四组之一:常规治疗、右美沙芬 30mg 每日 3 次、异丙托溴铵气雾剂 20μg 每日 3 次、每次 2 喷或蜂蜜 30mg(一汤匙)每日 3 次,疗程最长 14 天。排除标准为肺炎、住院标准、妊娠或哺乳期、合并肺部疾病、相关重大合并症、对任何研究药物过敏、不耐受或禁忌或入住长期住所。
668 例。主要结局指标为中重度咳嗽天数。所有患者都将被给予纸质症状日记进行自我管理。第 2 天或第 3 天安排第 2 次就诊以评估病情进展,第 15 天和第 29 天安排另外 2 次就诊进行临床评估、评估不良反应、再就诊和并发症。第 29 天仍有症状的患者将在基线就诊后 6 周内被随访。
该研究已获得 IDIAP Jordi Gol 伦理委员会的批准(编号:AC18/002)。本试验的结果将通过研究会议和同行评议期刊进行传播。
NCT03738917;预结果。