Clinical Sciences Department, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
J Vet Intern Med. 2019 Jul;33(4):1775-1783. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15519. Epub 2019 May 18.
After-hours or out-of-clinic crossmatches are often limited by the lack of access to specialized material and technical expertise.
HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: The goal was to adapt a stall-side crossmatch test for pretransfusion evaluation in horses.
Twelve healthy mares (plasma and blood donors, teaching mares).
In a prospective study, blood from 12 mares was used to compare the results of 132 crossmatches performed with a rapid gel assay to crossmatches performed with a microgel column assay, and with predicted compatibilities based on blood types and detection of antibodies at a reference laboratory (microplate assay). The rapid gel assay protocol for dogs was adapted to decrease the formation of rouleaux that initially precluded equine erythrocytes migration through the gel.
There was a good agreement between the rapid gel assay and the microgel assay as well as with the predicted compatibilities (κ > .6 for both). Agreement was higher between the microgel assay and the predicted compatibilities (κ = .8). The rapid gel assay failed to detect 6 predicted Aa incompatibilities (agglutinins-related), 3 of which were also not detected with the microgel assay.
Based on these results, the modified rapid gel assay could be useful in settings when access to the microgel assay is not available. Discrepancies between both gel techniques and predicted compatibilities were most often low-grade agglutination, which warrants further investigation to assess their clinical importance.
在非工作时间或非诊室进行交叉配血时,通常会受到缺乏专用材料和技术专业知识的限制。
假设/目的:目标是为马匹的输血前评估改编一种床边交叉配血试验。
12 匹健康母马(血浆和血液供体、教学母马)。
在一项前瞻性研究中,使用 12 匹母马的血液比较了 132 次快速凝胶检测与微凝胶柱检测的结果,以及在参考实验室(微量板检测)检测血型和抗体时预测的相容性。适应了用于犬的快速凝胶检测协议,以减少最初阻止马红细胞通过凝胶迁移的红细胞缗线状聚集的形成。
快速凝胶检测与微凝胶检测以及预测的相容性之间具有良好的一致性(κ值均>.6)。微凝胶检测与预测的相容性之间的一致性更高(κ=0.8)。快速凝胶检测未能检测到 6 种预测的 Aa 不相容性(与抗体相关),其中 3 种也未通过微凝胶检测检测到。
基于这些结果,改良的快速凝胶检测在无法获得微凝胶检测的情况下可能有用。凝胶技术与预测的相容性之间的差异通常是低度凝集,需要进一步研究以评估其临床意义。