College of Resources and Environment, Sino-Danish College, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Crop Science Section, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegaard Allé 13, DK-2630, Taastrup, Denmark.
College of Resources and Environment, Sino-Danish College, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research, Beijing, 100190, China.
J Environ Manage. 2019 Aug 1;243:370-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.089. Epub 2019 May 16.
Many technologies have been developed to control agricultural non-point-source pollution (ANPSP). However, most reduce pollution from only a single source instead of considering an entire region with multiple pollution sources as a control unit. A pollutant reduction system for controlling ANPSP at a regional scale could be built by integrating technologies and the reuse of treated wastewater (TWR) and nutrients (NR) to protect the environment and achieve agricultural sustainability. The present study proposes four systematic schemes involving TWR for irrigation and NR in a region with three sources of ANPSP (crop farming, livestock and aquaculture). Subsequently, a multi-objective evaluation model is established based on the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) combined with grey relational analysis (GRA) to identify the optimal scheme considering six indices, namely, pollutant reductions (total nitrogen, TN; total phosphorous, TP; ammonium-nitrogen, NH-N; and chemical oxygen demand, COD) and costs (construction and operational costs). The Taihu Lake Basin suffers from some of the worst ANPSP in China, and a case study was conducted in a town with three ANPSP sources. Four systems were developed on the basis of suggested technologies and the scenarios of TWR and NR (Scenario I: no reuse, Scenario II: reuse of all livestock wastewater and manure, Scenario III: reuse of some aquaculture wastewater, and Scenario IV: reuse of all livestock wastewater and manure and some aquaculture wastewater). Pollutant reductions were calculated based on removal efficiency and pollutant loads, which were estimated from the local pollutant export coefficients and agricultural information (crop farming, livestock, and aquaculture). The costs were determined on the basis of the total pollutant reductions and unit cost. The results showed that the optimal system was the Scenario IV because it had the highest grey correlation degree among the four proposed systems. The optimal system met the irrigation water demand in Xinjian. In the optimal system, the removal efficiencies of the pollutants TN, TP, NH-N, and COD were 84.3%, 94.2%, 89.6% and 94.0%, respectively. In addition, the implementation of NR in the optimal system reduced the use of chemical fertilizers by nearly 81.7 kg N ha and 39.9 kg P ha. The proposed methods provide a reference for the construction of a pollutant reduction system for controlling ANPSP in a multi-source region.
许多技术已经被开发出来用于控制农业面源污染(ANPSP)。然而,大多数技术只减少单一污染源的污染,而不是考虑将整个存在多个污染源的区域作为一个控制单元。通过整合技术和处理后的废水(TWR)和养分(NR)的再利用,可以建立一个用于控制区域农业面源污染的减排系统,从而保护环境并实现农业的可持续性。本研究提出了四个系统方案,涉及灌溉用 TWR 和来自三个农业面源污染源(种植业、畜牧业和水产养殖业)的 NR。随后,建立了一个基于层次分析法(AHP)和灰色关联分析(GRA)的多目标评价模型,以考虑六个指标(总氮、总磷、氨氮和化学需氧量)和成本(建设和运营成本)来识别最佳方案。太湖流域是中国农业面源污染最严重的地区之一,本研究在一个具有三个农业面源污染源的城镇进行了案例研究。在建议的技术和 TWR 和 NR 方案的基础上(方案 I:不重复使用,方案 II:重复使用所有牲畜废水和粪便,方案 III:重复使用部分水产养殖废水,方案 IV:重复使用所有牲畜废水和粪便以及部分水产养殖废水),开发了四个系统。根据当地污染物出口系数和农业信息(种植业、畜牧业和水产养殖业),基于去除效率和污染物负荷计算污染物减排量。成本是根据总污染物减排量和单位成本确定的。结果表明,方案 IV 是最佳系统,因为它在四个建议的系统中具有最高的灰色关联度。最优系统满足了新建县的灌溉用水需求。在最优系统中,污染物 TN、TP、NH-N 和 COD 的去除效率分别为 84.3%、94.2%、89.6%和 94.0%。此外,最优系统中的 NR 实施使化肥用量减少了近 81.7kg N ha 和 39.9kg P ha。所提出的方法为建立多源区域农业面源污染控制减排系统提供了参考。